Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of shim stiffness on the vibration response of tool-shim system and the impact fracture resistance of cutting tool in intermittent cutting

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cutting, the mechanical impact caused by material mechanics, geometric discontinuity, and intermittent cutting process is the main factor that induces cutting tool fracture. Impact fracture and fatigue failure of cutting tools are sudden, which can be harmful to safe production and quality control. In this paper, the effect mechanism of shim stiffness on the impact fracture performance of a tool in a mechanically clamped cutting tool system is studied. Furthermore, the vibration model of the tool-shim system is established to analyze the impact loading response characteristics of the tool-shim system under different stiffness shims. Meanwhile, the effect of shim stiffness on the loading rate, peak value, high-level fluctuation, unloading rate, and elastic energy release of shim elastic reaction force is explored. Apart from that, theoretical analysis of the stress field change near the tool crack tip is carried out. Finally, intermittent turning experiments are performed, including carbide inserts with four shims of N8 aluminum alloy, TC4 titanium alloy, 08 steel, and YT14 cemented carbide. Moreover, the analysis of each stage of the vibration response is verified. According to the results, the stiffness of the shim affects both the impact fracture of the tool basal body and the coating peeling. Besides, appropriately weakening the shim stiffness can reduce the load peak value of the shim elastic reaction force on the tool, the high load fluctuation amplitude, the unloading rate, and the dynamic stress intensity factor (DSIF), which can be conductive to improving the impact damage resistance of the tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All authors declare that all data and material in this manuscript are transparently available.

References

  1. Agmell M, Bushlya V, M’Saoubi R, Gutnichenko O, Zaporozhets O, Laakso S, Ståhl J (2020) Investigation of mechanical and thermal loads in PCBN tooling during machining of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05081-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Corne R, Nath C, Mansori ME, Kurfess T (2016) Enhancing spindle power data application with neural network for real-time tool wear/breakage prediction during inconel drilling. Procedia Manuf 5:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu X, Jia Z, Wang H, Si L, Liu Y, Wu W (2016) Tool wear appearance and failure mechanism of coated carbide tools in micro-milling of Inconel 718 super alloy. Ind Lubr Tribol 68:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-07-2015-0114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Samotugin SS, Lavrinenko VI, Kudinova EV, Samotugina YS (2013) The study of fracture toughness and failure mechanisms of cutting-tool hardmetals with plasma-modified surface. J Superhard Mater 35:242–250. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063457613040060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu K, Li XP, Liang SY (2007) The mechanism of ductile chip formation in cutting of brittle materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:875–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0531-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cui X, Zhao J, Zhou Y, Zheng G (2013) Damage mechanics analysis of failure mechanisms for ceramic cutting tools in intermittent turning. Eur J Mech A/Solids 37:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2012.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li H, Li J, Yuan H (2018) A review of the extended finite element method on macrocrack and microcrack growth simulations. Theor Appl Fract Mech 97:236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denkena B, Grove T, Theuer M (2018) Micro crack formation in hardmetal milling tools. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 70:210–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Postek E, Sadowski T (2018) Distributed microcracking process of WC/Co cermet under dynamic impulse compressive loading. Compos Struct 194:494–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai Z, Laheri V, Zhu X, Gilabert FA (2021) Experimental study of compression-tension asymmetry in asphalt matrix under quasi-static and dynamic loads via an integrated DMA-based approach. Constr Build Mater 283:122725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Ashraf M, Li H, Zheng X, Wang H, Al-Deen S, Hazell P (2019) An experimental investigation on parallel bamboo strand lumber specimens under quasi static and impact loading. Constr Build Mater 228:116724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen W, Lu F, Cheng M (2002) Tension and compression tests of two polymers under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Polym Test 21:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00055-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smirnov IV, Lamzin DA, Konstantinov AY, Brogov AM, Lomunov AK (2020) A unified experimental-theoretical approach to predict the critical stress characteristics of failure and yielding under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Eng Fract Mech 225:106197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang J, Deng H, Taheri A, Ke B, Liu C (2019) Deterioration and strain energy development of sandstones under quasi-static and dynamic loading after freeze-thaw cycles. Cold Reg Sci Technol 160:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mendoza I, Drury D, Matejunas A, Lvy J, Koumlis S, Jewell P, Brennecka G, Lamberson G (2021) Quasi-static and dynamic fracture behavior of lead zirconate titanate: a study of poling and loading rate. Eng Fract Mech 247:107669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cun-jian L (2000) Effects of temperature and loading rate on fracture toughness of structural steels. Mater Des 21:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fan TY (2006) Principle and application of fracture dynamics. Beijing Institute of Technol Press

  18. Kim Y, Chao YJ (2007) Effect of loading rate on dynamic fracture initiation toughness of brittle materials. Int J Fract 145:195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-007-9114-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lang L, Zhu ZM, Wang HB, Huang J, Wang M, Zhang XS (2020) Effect of loading rates on crack propagating speed, fracture toughness and energy release rate using single-cleavage trapezoidal open specimen under impact loads. J Cent South Univ 27:2440–2454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-020-4460-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin T, Zhang S, Li X, Bai L (2018) A numerical estimate method of dynamic fracture initiation toughness of rock under high temperature. Eng Fract Mech 204:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weerasooriya T, Moy P, Casem D, Cheng M, Chen W (2006) Fracture toughness for PMMA as a function of loading rate. Proc 2006 SEM Annu Conf Expo Exp Appl Mech 2:1048–1055

  22. Cao L, Lin Y, Lu F, Chen R, Zhang Z, Li Y (2015) Experimental study on the shock absorption performance of combined aluminium honeycombs under impact loading. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/689546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleischer J, Becke C, Pabst R (2008) Improving tool life by varying resilience and damping properties in close proximity of the cutting edge. Prod Eng 2:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-008-0126-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moradi H, Movahhedy MR, Vossoughi G (2012) Dynamics of regenerative chatter and internal resonance in milling process with structural and cutting force nonlinearities. J Sound Vib 331:3844–3865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shuai G (2018) Tool life improvement using a shim with nanostructured composite damping coating synthesized by high power impulse magnetron sputtering. KTH Royal Ins Technol School

  26. Pandya DH (2020) Experimental investigation of chatter in boring operation using shim

  27. Rogov VA, Ghorbani S, Popikov AN, Polushin NI (2017) Improvement of cutting tool performance during machining process by using different shim. Arch Civ Mech Eng 17:694–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gandhi N, Pandya DH (2021) Computational investigation of chatter for face mill tool on VMC using different shim material with experimental validation. Adv Mater Manuf Energy Eng 1:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Biggs JD (1964) Introduction to structural dynamics. McGraw Hill Publishing Company, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Qudeiri JEA, Zaiout A, Mourad AHI, Abidi MH, Elkaseer A (2020) Principles and characteristics of different EDM processes in machining tool and die steels. Appl Sci 10:1–46. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10062082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Beri B, Meszaros G, Stepan G (2021) Machining of slender workpieces subjected to time-periodic axial force: stability and chatter suppression. J Sound Vib 504:116114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Yao X, Hu G, Chen P (2019) Drag reduction performance of an axial oscillating tool with different kinds of waveform using a multiscale friction model. J Pet Sci Eng 177:135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zambrano OA (2021) A review on the effect of impact toughness and fracture toughness on impact-abrasion wear. J Mater Eng Perform 30:7101–7116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05960-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nowell D, Araújo JA (2002) The effect of rapidly varying contact stress fields on fretting fatigue. Int J Fatigue 24:763–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan F, Liu X, He G, Zhang J, Yu Z (2012) Research on the tools’ strength in the condition of uncommonly dynamic heavy-duty loads. Adv Mater Res 500:563–568. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.500.563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang F, Zhao J, Li Z, Li A (2016) Coated carbide tool failure analysis in high-speed intermittent cutting process based on finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:805–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7632-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang S, Li J, Zhu X, Lv H (2013) Saw-tooth chip formation and its effect on cutting force fluctuation in turning of Inconel 718. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14:957–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0126-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pekelharing AJ (1980) Cutting tool damage in interrupted cutting. Wear 62:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(80)90035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu Q, Liu X, Yan F, Cheng Y, Qiao S, He G, Sun S (2014) Research on the tools’ life in the dynamic heavy-duty cutting process. Key Eng Mater 589–590:327–331. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.589-590.327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang B, Liu Z, Song Q, Wan Y, Shi Z (2016) Proper selection of cutting parameters and cutting tool angle to lower the specific cutting energy during high speed machining of 7050–T7451 aluminum alloy. J Clean Prod 129:292–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rahmani H, Balootaki MA (2020) Studying the effect of pulse shape on dynamic stress intensity factor at the finite crack tip using displacement. Int J Adv Des Manuf Technol 13:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ingraffea AR, Manu C (1980) Stress-intensity factor computation in three dimensions with quarter-point elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 15:1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620151002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Forth SC, Herman DJ, James MA, Johnston WM (2005) Fatigue crack growth rate and stress-intensity factor corrections for out-of-plane crack growth. J ASTM Int. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI12026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Y, Zhou X, Kou M (2019) An improved coupled thermo-mechanic bond-based peridynamic model for cracking behaviors in brittle solids subjected to thermal shocks. Eur J Mech A/Solids 73:282–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.09.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu H, Chen X, Sun Y (2020) A generalized bond-based peridynamic model for quasi-brittle materials enriched with bond tension–rotation–shear coupling effects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 372:113405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113405

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Panchadhara R, Gordon PA (2016) Application of peridynamic stress intensity factors to dynamic fracture initiation and propagation. Int J Fract 201:81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0124-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng G, Xu R, Cheng X, Zhao G, Li L, Zhao J (2018) Effect of cutting parameters on wear behavior of coated tool and surface roughness in high-speed turning of 300M. Meas J Int Meas Confed 125:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Orra K, Choudhury SK (2018) Tribological aspects of various geometrically shaped micro-textures on cutting insert to improve tool life in hard turning process. J Manuf Process 31:502–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shokrani A, Al-Samarrai I, Newman ST (2019) Hybrid cryogenic MQL for improving tool life in machining of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 43:229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yildirim ÇV, Kivak T, Sarikaya M, Şirin Ş (2020) Evaluation of tool wear, surface roughness/topography and chip morphology when machining of Ni-based alloy 625 under MQL, cryogenic cooling and CryoMQL. J Mater Res Technol 9:2079–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Martin ML, Fenske JA, Liu GS, Sofronis P, Robertson LM (2011) On the formation and nature of quasi-cleavage fracture surfaces in hydrogen embrittled steels. Acta Mater 59:1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bianchetti C, Zheng R, Chromik RR, Lévesque M, Brochu M (2018) Comparison of small and long fatigue crack growth behavior in AA 7050–T7451. Eng Fract Mech 202:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ogawa Y, Birenis D, Matsunaga H, Takakuwa O, Yamabe J, Prytz Ø, Thøgersen A (2018) The role of intergranular fracture on hydrogen-assisted fatigue crack propagation in pure iron at a low stress intensity range. Mater Sci Eng A 733:316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang T, Zha X, Chen F, Wang J, Lin L, Xie H, Lin F, Jiang F (2021) Research on cutting performance of coated cutting tools by a new impact test method considering contact stress condition caused by segmented chips. J Manuf Process 68:1569–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52075275, 51675289), Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province (2018GGX103023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hongwei Zhang: writing — original draft, writing — review & editing. Guosheng Su: conceptualization, writing — review & editing, project administration. Zhitao Han: validation. Jialin Sheng: methodology. Peirong Zhang: methodology. Hongxia Zhang: formal analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guosheng Su.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate

All authors consent to their participation in the research of this manuscript.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publish the research content of this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Su, G., Han, Z. et al. Influences of shim stiffness on the vibration response of tool-shim system and the impact fracture resistance of cutting tool in intermittent cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123, 571–589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10183-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10183-6

Keywords

Navigation