Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geometrical defect analysis of overhang geometry produced by electron beam melting: experimental and statistical investigations

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While electron beam melting is used to produce near net shape parts, it is still important to study geometrical defects since the final parts may include a serious change of geometry or considerable distortions and thus cannot match the desired geometry even after machining. For example, overhang geometries are very challenging to manufacture, because of the defects they present, such as warping, side loss, and raised edges. The objective of the present paper is to identify relations between the typical geometrical defects found in parts that include overhang volumes, especially side loss and warping defects. The originality of this study lies in the manufacture of a large number of Ti-6Al-4 V parts in order to carry out a statistical analysis of the results. Correlations are studied between the characteristic parameters of the defects and as a function of the manufacturing conditions. In addition, a principal component analysis is proposed to identify families of defects (modes). Finally, future prospects are discussed for designing parts with the aim of improving geometric quality and for simulating defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All required data for this analysis are directly available into the paper. No additional data is needed.

Code availability

The code used to make the analysis of data is basic option of Matlab Software and authors use directly the measured rought data. No additional detail is required to verifiy the analysis and associated conclusion.

References

  1. Taylor HC, Garibay EA, Wicker RB (2021) Toward a common laser powder bed fusion qualification test artifact. Addit Manuf 39:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. America Makes & ANSI Additive Manufacturing Standardization Collaborative (AMSC) (2018) Standardization roadmap for additive manufacturing V2

  3. Rebaioli L, Fassi I (2017) A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:2571–2598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimitrov D, Van Wijck W, Schreve K, De Beer N (2006) Investigating the achievable accuracy of three dimensional printing. Rapid Prototyp J 12(1):42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooke AL, Soons JA (2010) Variability in the geometric accuracy of additively manufactured test parts. In: Proceedings of 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, pp 1–12

  6. Moylan S, Slotwinski J, Cooke A, Jurrens K, Donmez MA (2012) Proposal for a standardized test artifact for additive manufacturing machines and processes. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium. Austin, TX, pp 6–8

  7. Kruth JP (1991) Material increase manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 40(2):603–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Castillo L (2005) Study about the rapid manufacturing of complex parts of stainless steel and titanium. TNO Report with the Collaboration of AIMME

  9. Piaget A, Museau M, Paris H (2017) Manufacturing space homogeneity in additive manufacturing - electron beam melting case. Stroj Vestn J Mech Eng 63(10):553–558. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2017.4365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lieneke T, Adam G, Leuders S, Knoop F, Josupeit S, Delfs P, Funke N, Zimmer D (2015) Systematical determination of tolerances for additive manufacturing by measuring linear dimensions. In 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Austin, Texas, USA, pp 371–384

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fahad M, Hopkinson N (2017) Evaluation and comparison of geometrical accuracy of parts produced by sintering-based additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):3389–3394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allaire G, Dapogny C, Estevez R, Faure A, Michailidis G (2017) Structural optimization under overhang constraints imposed by additive manufacturing technologies. J Comput Phys 351:295–328

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng B, Lu P, Chou K (2014) Thermomechanical investigation of overhang fabrications in electron beam additive manufacturing. Int Manuf Sci Eng Conf 45813:V002T02A024. Am Soc Mech Eng

  14. Cheng B, Chou K (2015) \Geometric consideration of support structures in part overhang fabrications by electron beam additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 69:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Béraud N (2016) Fabrication assistée par ordinateur pour le procédé EBM. PhD thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes

  16. Tounsi R, Vignat F (2017) New concept of support structures in electron beam melting manufacturing to reduce geometric defects. In: 15e Colloque National AIP-Primeca, pp 1–6

  17. Ghaoui S, Ledoux Y, Ballu A, Hoang T, Museau M, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2019) Analyse de la variation géométrique des pièces produites en fabrication additive EBM-cas de pièces avec volume surplombant. In: 16e Colloque National S-mart

  18. Piaget A (2019) Maîtrise de la qualité en fabrication additive. PhD thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes

  19. Schmutzler C, Zimmermann A, Zaeh MF (2016) Compensating warpage of 3d printed parts using free-form deformation. Procedia CIRP 41:1017–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmutzler C, Bayerlein F, Janson S, Seidel C, Zaeh MF (2016) Pre-compensation of warpage for additive manufacturing. J Mech Eng Autom 6(8):392–399

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ghaoui S, Ledoux Y, Vignat F, Museau M, Vo TH, Villeneuve F, Ballu A (2020) Analysis of geometrical defects in overhang fabrications in electron beam melting based on thermomechanical simulations and experimental validations. Addit Manuf 36:101557

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dinwiddie RB, Dehoff RR, Lloyd PD, Lowe LE, Ulrich JB (2013) Thermographic in-situ process monitoring of the electron-beam melting technology used in additive manufacturing. Thermosense Therm Infrared Appl XXXV 8705:87050K. Int Soc Opt Photonics

  23. Franchitti S, Borrelli R, Pirozzi C, Carrino L, Polini W, Sorrentino L, Gazzerro A (2018) Investigation on electron beam melting: Dimensional accuracy and process repeatability. Vacuum 157:340–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zäh MF, Lutzmann S (2010) Modelling and simulation of electron beam melting. Prod Eng Res Dev 4:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0197-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Juechter V, Scharowsky T, Singer RF, Körner C (2014) Processing window and evaporation phenomena for Ti–6Al–4V produced by selective electron beam melting. Acta Mater 76:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Bermani SS (2011) An investigation into microstructure and microstructural control of additive layer manufactured Ti-6Al-4V by electron beam melting. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield

  27. Hotelling A, Analysis H (1933) of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 24(417–441):498–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jolliffe TI (2002) Principal component analysis Springer New York. ISBN: 978-1-4419-2999-0

  29. Lee S-D, Jang K-Y (2001) Identification of the deviation from the mean and multimodal distribution in the automotive assembly process: Correspondence analysis approach. Int J Prod Res 39(10):2105–2120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110038522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ballu A, Gomes R, Mimoso P, Cristovao C, Correia N (2017) Comparison of mode decomposition methods tested on simulated surfaces. Adv Mech Des Eng Manuf 1053–1062. Springer

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the ANR GeoCAM, grant ANR-17-CE10- 0004 of the French National Research.

Agency (ANR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bordeaux, I2M, UMR 5295, F-33400, Talence, France

    Yann Ledoux, Soukaina Ghaoui & Alex Ballu

  2. University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000, Grenoble, France

    Thanh Hoang Vo, François Villeneuve, Frederic Vignat & Matthieu Museau

Authors
  1. Yann Ledoux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soukaina Ghaoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thanh Hoang Vo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alex Ballu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. François Villeneuve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Frederic Vignat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matthieu Museau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yann Ledoux.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The type of study is not concerned with ethical aspect.

Consent to participate

The authors fully agree to submit the manuscript the the journal JAMT.

Consent for publication

The authors fully agree to publish the manuscript the the journal JAMT.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ledoux, Y., Ghaoui, S., Vo, T.H. et al. Geometrical defect analysis of overhang geometry produced by electron beam melting: experimental and statistical investigations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122, 2059–2075 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10040-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10040-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation