Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive sampling method for thin-walled parts based on on-machine measurement

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machining deformation compensation technology based on on-machine measurement has been widely used in the field of thin-walled part machining. However, few research has been conducted on sampling methods for the measurement of thin-walled parts. In this study, we considered the influence of machining deformation in thin-walled regions, established a machining deformation prediction model (MDPM) based on the finite element method (FEM), and applied it to the sampling optimization process. Furthermore, we proposed an adaptive sampling method based on the maximum corresponding point deviation (MCPD) at the measurement point interval of the non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) curve. The proposed method was compared with three commonly used sampling methods (uniform sampling, curvature-based sampling, and maximum deviation-based sampling). Sampling experiments were performed with one NURBS curve and two machined thin-walled parts. The experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to the three commonly used sampling strategies in terms of reconstruction accuracy, sampling efficiency, and result stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zhao X, Zheng L, Zhang Y (2022) Online first-order machining error compensation for thin-walled parts considering time-varying cutting condition. J Manuf Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ge G, Du Z, Feng X, Yang J (2020) An integrated error compensation method based on on-machine measurement for thin web parts machining. Precis Eng 63:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang N, Bi Q, Wang Y, Sun C (2014) 5-Axis adaptive flank milling of flexible thin-walled parts based on the on-machine measurement. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 84:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guiassa R, Mayer JRR (2011) Predictive compliance based model for compensation in multi-pass milling by on-machine probing. CIRP Ann 60:391–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu M, Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhang D (2012) Adaptive sampling method for inspection planning on CMM for free-form surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4623-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Jiang X, Blunt LA, Leach RK, Scott PJ (2012) Intelligent sampling for the measurement of structured surfaces. Meas Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/8/085006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ascione R, Moroni G, Petrò S, Romano D (2013) Adaptive inspection in coordinate metrology based on kriging models. Precis Eng 37:44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2012.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rajamohan G, Shunmugam MS, Samuel GL (2011) Effect of probe size and measurement strategies on assessment of freeform profile deviations using coordinate measuring machine. Measurement 44:832–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He G, Sang Y, Pang K, Sun G (2018) An improved adaptive sampling strategy for freeform surface inspection on CMM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:1521–1535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1612-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu J, Zhao J, Yang X, Qu X, Wang X, Liu J (2018) A tangential approximation algorithm for measured data reduction of blade section curves. Measurement 128:504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng X, Liu X, Feng P, Zeng L, Jiang H, Sun Z, Zhang S (2022) Efficient adaptive sampling methods based on deviation analysis for on-machine inspection. Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu K, Wang W, Wu Y, Wei Y, Chen Z (2013) An adaptive sampling approach for digitizing unknown free-form surfaces based on advanced path detecting. Procedia CIRP 10:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.08.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Edgeworth R, Wilhelm RG (1999) Adaptive sampling for coordinate metrology. Precis Eng 23:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-6359(99)00004-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedone P, Vicario G, Romano D (2009) Kriging-based sequential inspection plans for coordinate measuring machines. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-018-1030-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dumas A, Echard B, Gayton N, Rochat O, Dantan J-Y, Van Der Veen S (2013) AK-ILS: An Active learning method based on Kriging for the inspection of large surfaces. Precis Eng 37:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2012.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Poniatowska M (2012) Deviation model based method of planning accuracy inspection of free-form surfaces using CMMs. Measurement 45:927–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Piegl L (1991) On NURBS: a Survey. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 11:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.67702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi F (2001) CAGD&NURBS. Highter Education Press

  19. Wang X, Li Z, Bi Q, Zhu L, Ding H (2019) An accelerated convergence approach for real-time deformation compensation in large thin-walled parts machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 142:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qi H, Tian Y, Zhang D (2012) Machining forces prediction for peripheral milling of low-rigidity component with curved geometry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:1599–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4126-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu X, Ahmad F, Yamazaki K, Mori M (2005) Adaptive interpolation scheme for NURBS curves with the integration of machining dynamics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen X-D, Ma W, Xu G, Paul J-C (2010) Computing the Hausdorff distance between two B-spline curves. Comput-Aided Des 42:1197–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hernández-Mederos V, Estrada-Sarlabous J (2003) Sampling points on regular parametric curves with control of their distribution. Comput Aided Geom Des 20:363–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8396(03)00079-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang RS, Wang WH, Zhang DH, Wang ZQ (2016) A practical sampling method for profile measurement of complex blades. Measurement 81:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu L, Zhao S (2019) High-quality point sampling for B-spline fitting of parametric curves with feature recognition. J Comput Appl Math 345:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.04.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in the writing, discussion, and revision of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimin Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors consent to participate in the study, agreeing to the signature of the article.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publish the article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, L., Wang, A., Xing, W. et al. Adaptive sampling method for thin-walled parts based on on-machine measurement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122, 2577–2592 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09962-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09962-y

Keywords

Navigation