Skip to main content
Log in

An origami-inspired infill pattern for additive manufacturing to reinforce the energy absorption performance

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Origami techniques derived from antique paper folding arts have been applied to solve engineering problems such as weight/space-saving structures and their rapid deployment for foldability. Recently, origami techniques’ potential in mechanical reinforcement for structural designs has also been discussed. For example, the mechanical performance of origami tubular structures can be significantly improved compared with the circular and hexagonal tubes under lateral loading. In this paper, an origami-inspired tubular structure was applied as the infill pattern for additive manufacturing, and energy absorption performance under dynamic and static loadings was investigated. Fused filament fabrication was selected as the testbed for the origami-inspired infill pattern investigation. The samples with the origami infill pattern presented higher dynamic and quasi-static energy absorption performance than samples with grid or honeycomb infill patterns. The proposed structural reinforcement method can be expanded to crash-worthy structures, thin-wall structures, functional structures, and the design of lightweight, high-strength parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Campbell I, Bourell D, Gibson I (2012) Additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping comes of age. Rapid Prototyp J 18:255–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211231563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G et al (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B Eng 143:172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021 (2021) Additive manufacturing - General principles - Fundamentals and vocabulary

  4. Aguilar-Duque JI, Hernández-Arellano JL, Avelar-Sosa L et al (2019) Additive manufacturing: fused deposition modeling advances. In: García Alcaraz JL, Rivera Cadavid L, González-Ramírez RG et al (eds) Best practices in manufacturing processes: experiences from Latin America. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 347–366

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ravindrababu S, Govdeli Y, Wong ZW, Kayacan E (2018) Evaluation of the influence of build and print orientations of unmanned aerial vehicle parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling process. J Manuf Process 34:659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.07.007

  6. Yadav DK, Srivastava R, Dev S (2020) Design & fabrication of ABS part by FDM for automobile application. Mater Today Proc 26:2089–2093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.451

  7. Zaneldin E, Ahmed W, Mansour A, Hassan AE (2021) Dimensional stability of 3D printed objects made from plastic waste using FDM: potential construction applications. Build 11

  8. Coronel JL, Masum Billah KM, Acosta Carrasco CF et al (2020) Hybrid manufacturing with FDM technology for enabling power electronics component fabrication. Solid Free Fabr 2018 Proc 29th Annu Int Solid Free Fabr Symp - An Addit Manuf Conf SFF 2018 357–364

  9. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540810862028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbott AC, Tandon GP, Bradford RL et al (2018) Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf 19:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.002

  11. Rajpurohit SR, Dave HK (2018) Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part. Rapid Prototyp J 24:1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stavropoulos P, Foteinopoulos P, Papapacharalampopoulos A (2021) On the impact of additive manufacturing processes complexity on modelling. Appl Sci 11:7743. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stavropoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A, Michail CK, Chryssolouris G (2021) Robust additive manufacturing performance through a control oriented digital twin. Metals (Basel) 11:708. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Makris S, Aivaliotis P (2021) Framework for accurate simulation and model-based control of hybrid manufacturing processes. Procedia CIRP 97:470–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez-Vicente M, Calle W, Ferrandiz S, Conejero A (2016) Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing. 3D Print Addit Manuf 3:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0036

  16. Alafaghani A, Qattawi A (2018) Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method. J Manuf Process 36:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sunny SF, Rostami S, Malik AS (2018) Effects of fluid cavity modeling when predicting compressive strength of FDM printed nylon with varying infill pattern and density. In: Volume 1: Additive Manufacturing; Bio and Sustainable Manufacturing. Am Soc Mech Eng

  18. Mishra PK, Senthil P, Adarsh S, Anoop MS (2021) An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D printed polylactic acid parts. Compos Commun 24:100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen W, Cao Y, Jiang X et al (2021) Experimental and numerical investigation on radial stiffness of origami-inspired tubular structures. J Appl Mech. 89 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052799

  20. Hyde RA, Dixit SN, Weisberg AH, Rushford MC (2002) Eyeglass: a very large aperture diffractive space telescope. Highly Innov Sp Telesc Concepts 4849:28. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.460420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song J, Chen Y, Lu G (2012) Axial crushing of thin-walled structures with origami patterns. Thin-Walled Struct 54:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.02.007

  22. Lee TU, Yang X, Ma J et al (2019) Elastic buckling shape control of thin-walled cylinder using pre-embedded curved-crease origami patterns. Int J Mech Sci 151:322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma J, Song J, Chen Y (2018) An origami-inspired structure with graded stiffness. Int J Mech Sci 136:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leevers PS (1999) Impact strength BT - mechanical properties and testing of polymers: an A–Z reference. In: Swallowe GM (ed). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 127–129

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Aaron Jordan and Mattew Janowicz for providing the instruments training and lab support for this study.

Funding

This paper is based on the work supported by the Iowa Energy Center (IEC) Award Number 20-IEC-015 and the Exploratory Research Project grant from the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering (IMSE_ERP) at Iowa State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Weijun Shen: conceptualisation; methodology; validation; formal analysis; investigation; data curation; writing—original draft preparation; writing–review and editing. Xuepeng Jiang: methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation. Zhan Zhang: conceptualisation; methodology investigation; writing—review and editing; project administration; funding acquisition. Gül E. Okudan-Kremer: conceptualisation; methodology; formal analysis; investigation; writing—review and editing; supervision; project administration; funding acquisition. Hantang Qin: generation of project ideas; conceptualisation; methodology; validation; investigation; writing—review and editing; project administration; funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hantang Qin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The article involves no studies on human or animal subjects.

Consent to participate

All authors were fully involved in the study and preparation of the manuscript, and each of the authors has read and concurred with the content in the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publish the content in the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, W., Jiang, X., Zhang, Z. et al. An origami-inspired infill pattern for additive manufacturing to reinforce the energy absorption performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122, 4267–4274 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09883-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09883-w

Keywords

Navigation