Skip to main content
Log in

Towards electroforming of copper net-shape parts on fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed mandrels

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing demand for customization and personalization, the manufacturing industry faces new challenges related to cost-effective, low batch size production. Additive manufacturing (AM) is among the promising technology to address this problem. AM has however some limitations in metal structure fabrication, including high surface roughness, porosity, and poor mechanical properties. Electroforming on an AM mandrel could be a potential alternative solution for low batch production and complex structures with high aspect ratios. This process takes advantage of both high design freedom from AM and better structural control with electroforming. However, the uniformness, deposition quality, and end-geometry of the electrodeposition on a mandrel are not always guaranteed. In this paper, a method and an algorithm are proposed to improve the geometric precision of the deposition on the mandrel. The desired net-shape can be achieved by a corrected mandrel that takes the variable electrodeposition thickness into consideration. Therefore, the dimensional accuracy of the outer surface can be improved for applications requiring the dimensional accuracy of the outer shape, and a uniform part thickness is less important. In addition, a method that allows the forming of parts with controlled multiple thicknesses on the same mandrel is proposed. As one of the potential applications, the manufacturing of high-aspect-ratio flexures is demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Monden Y (1994) Toyota production system. Springer, US, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Okhiria O (2017) Cost management in the new product introduction process of TruPrint 1000. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg

  3. Pine BJ (1993) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu SJ (2013) Evolving paradigms of manufacturing: from mass production to mass customization and personalization. Procedia CIRP 7:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reinertsen DG (2009) The principles of product development flow. Celeritas, Redondo Beach

  6. Thomas DS, Gilber SW (2015) Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing: a literature review and discussion. NIST Spec Publ. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duda T, Raghavan LV (2016) 3D metal printing technology. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DebRoy T, Mukherjee T, Milewski JO, Elmer JW, Ribic B, Blecher JJ, Zhang W (2019) Scientific, technological and economic issues in metal printing and their solutions. Nat Mater 18:1026–1032. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0408-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhattacharyya B (2015) Electrochemical micromachining for nanofabrication, MEMS and nanotechnology. Elsevier, Oxford

  11. Ahmed N, Naeem MA, Rehman AU, Rafaqat M, Umer U, Ragab AE (2021) High aspect ratio thin-walled structures in d2 steel through wire electric discharge machining (EDM). Micromachines 12:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12010001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee C, Tarbutton JA (2015) Compliance and control characteristics of an additive manufactured-flexure stage. Rev Sci Instrum 86:045107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gräser P, Linß S, Harfensteller F, Torres M, Zentner L, Theska R (2021) High-precision and large-stroke XY micropositioning stage based on serially arranged compliant mechanisms with flexure hinges. Precis Eng 72:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Y, Qian S, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Cao H, Huang M (2019) Experimental study on three-dimensional microstructure copper electroforming based on 3D printing technology. Micromachines 10:887. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10120887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuzaki R, Kanatani T, Todoroki A (2019) Multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers and metals using fused filament fabrication and electroforming. Addit Manuf 29:100812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Phull GS, Kumar S, Walia RS, Singh H, Singh H (2020) Copper electroforming optimization for fused deposition modeling produced abs components for indirect tooling applications. J Adv Manuf Syst 19:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021968672050002X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugavaneswaran M, Prince MT, Azad A (2019) Effect of electroplating on surface roughness and dimension of FDM parts at various build orientations. FME Transactions 47:880–886. https://doi.org/10.5937/fmet1904880S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MacGeough JA, Leu MC, Rajurkar KP, de Silva AKM, Liu Q (2001) Electroforming process and application to micro/macro manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 50:499–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62990-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rennie AEW, Bocking CE, Bennett GR (2001) Electroforming of rapid prototyping mandrels for electro-discharge machining electrodes. J Mater Process Technol 110:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00878-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlesinger M, Paunovic M (2010) Modern Electroplating. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Bagotsky VS (2006) Fundamentals of electrochemistry. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fallah P, Hof LA, Wuthrich R (2021) Fabrication of high-thickness and low surface roughness metal parts by a hybrid electrochemical manufacturing process. Adv Ind Manuf Eng 2:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2021.100034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knill EC (1989) Effects of shields and baffles on the distribution of chromium electrodeposits. Plat Surf Finish 76:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pilz U (1995) Calculation of the parameters of perforated shields for applications in electroforming. Plat Surf Finish 82:56–57

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prentice G (2003) Electrochemical engineering. In: Robert AM (ed) Encyclopedia of physical science and technology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 143–159

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Dong YS, Lin PH, Wang HX (2006) Electroplating preparation of Ni-Al2O3 graded composite coatings using a rotating cathode. Surf Coat Technol 200:3633–3636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Garche J (2009) Encyclopedia of electrochemical power sources. Elsevier, In Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (2001) Electrochemical methods : fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bolar G, Das A, Joshi SN (2018) Measurement and analysis of cutting force and product surface quality during end-milling of thin-wall components. Meas J Int Meas Confederation 121:190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the NSERC – Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Wüthrich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Z., Aghili, S.M. & Wüthrich, R. Towards electroforming of copper net-shape parts on fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed mandrels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122, 1055–1067 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09837-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09837-2

Keywords

Navigation