Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The co-optimization method of tool parameters and mounting position parameters for cylindrical gear chamfering tool

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In hobbing motion chamfering of cylindrical gear tooth profiles, the tool parameters and mounting position parameters of the chamfering tool directly affect the results. In this paper, the co-optimization method of multiparameters is proposed. Considering the consistency and symmetry of the chamfering result, a multiparameter co-optimization model is established. The improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms-II (INSGA-II) is proposed for the optimization effect of the model. The optimization and determination parameter combinations are performed using INSGA-II and Fuzzy C-means_Grey Relational Projection (FCM_GRP). Finally, the optimized parameter combinations are used to calculate the tool rake face profile, and the local curve superposition improves the uneven chamfering at the transition arc. The proposed method’s effectiveness is verified based on the tooth profile chamfering simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zhao H, Wu Q, Huang K, Qiu M, Liu P (2013) Status and problem research on gear study. J Mech Eng 049:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding S, Zhang H, Guo E, Wu W, Zhang Y, Song A (2021) Integrated roughing, finishing and chamfering turning process of toroidal worm manufacture on a general CNC lathe. J Manuf Process 70:341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu J, Pagilla PR (2021) Dual-edge robotic gear chamfering with registration error compensation. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 69:10208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schlatter M, Müller N (2019) A New Method for Gear Chamfering. In: Hloch S, Klichová D, Krolczyk GM et al (eds) Advances in Manufacturing Engineering and Materials. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 18–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei W, Li Z, Tan R (2021) Tooth crest chamfering method of spiral bevel gear using ball end milling cutter. Proc Ins Mech Eng 235:726–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tatar K, Svenningsson I (2022) Effect of chamfer width and chamfer angle on tool wear in slot milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120:2923–2935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang N, Tang Y, Wang P (2011) The design and simulation of gear-shaped profile chamfering structure. AMR 305:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ventura CEH, Köhler J, Denkena B (2014) Strategies for grinding of chamfers in cutting inserts. Precis Eng 38:749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asad M, Ijaz H, Khan MAA, Khan M, Mabrouki T, Rashid MU (2022) Comparative analyses and investigations of chamfered and honed-edge tool geometries on tool wear, chip morphology, residual stresses and end-burr formation. J Manuf Process 80:196–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang N, Wu Q (2005) The effects of chamfered and honed tool edge geometry in machining of three aluminum alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1178–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang N, Krebs E, Baumann J, Zhou Y, Wu S, Biermann D (2020) Experimental investigation on influence of engagement angle and tool geometry on plunge milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:1973–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed F, Ko TJ, Jongmin L, Kwak Y, Yoon I, Kumaran S (2021) Tool geometry optimization of a ball end mill based on finite element simulation of machining the tool steel-AISI H13 using grey relational method. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 22:1191–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duan X, Peng F, Zhu K, Jiang G (2019) Tool orientation optimization considering cutter deflection error caused by cutting force for multi-axis sculptured surface milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:1925–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Wang J, Zhao D, Li G, Chen C (2018) A two-stage approach for combined heat and power economic emission dispatch: combining multi-objective optimization with integrated decision making. Energy 162:237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao Y, Dhahad HA, Mohamed AM, Anqi AE (2021) Thermo-economic investigation and multi-objective optimization of a novel enhanced heat pump system with zeotropic mixture using NSGA-II. Appl Therm Eng 194:116374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan M, Li Y, Zhang L, Pei F (2021) Research on intelligent workshop resource scheduling method based on improved NSGA-II algorithm. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 71:102141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang M, Luo W, Wang X (2009) A normal distribution crossover for e-MOEA. Journal of Software 20:305–314

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia T, Li M (2021) An efficient multi-objective robust optimization method by sequentially searching from nominal Pareto solutions. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 21:041010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou S, Li D, Zhang Z, Ping R (2021) A New Membership Scaling Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 29:2810–2818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hao X, Li M, Chen Y (2020) China’s overcapacity industry evaluation based on TOPSIS grey relational projection method with mixed attributes. GS 11:288–308

  21. Sun G, Guan X, Yi X, Zhou Z (2018) Grey relational analysis between hesitant fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Expert Syst Appl 92:521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Z, Chen L (2018) Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm. J Syst Eng Electron 29:789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Key Projects of Strategic Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation of the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2020YFE0201000), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M700618), Special Funding for Postdoctoral Research Projects in Chongqing, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51905059), and the Innovative Research Group of Universities in Chongqing (No. CXQT21024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Manufacturing Equipment Mechanism Design and Control, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, 400067, China

    Kun He, Xiaohu He, Yanbin Du, Aoting Wang & Xiao Yang

  2. Chongqing Machine Tool (Group) Co., Ltd, Chongqing, 400055, China

    Kun He, Yanbin Du & Xiao Yang

Authors
  1. Kun He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaohu He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanbin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aoting Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Kun He contributed to the conception of the study; Xiaohu He performed the experiment; Xiaohu He contributed significantly to the analysis and manuscript preparation; Yanbin Du, Aoting Wang, and Xiao Yang helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Yes.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, K., He, X., Du, Y. et al. The co-optimization method of tool parameters and mounting position parameters for cylindrical gear chamfering tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 121, 4473–4483 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09616-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09616-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation