Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Producing high quality cold-drawn steel tubes using an optimal thickness of tin as a tribo-layer

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the tin coating layer is utilized as a solid lubricant for the cold steel tube drawing process. The effect of different thicknesses of tin coatings as a tribo-layer has been investigated. The electroplating process has been used for depositing a tin coating layer by deploying an environmentally benign citric acid–based electrolyte bath and the layer thickness is controlled by varying the time of the electroplating process. Characterization of the coating layer is carried out using SEM, EDS, and 3D digital microscopy techniques. Experimental trials of the tube drawing process have been conducted for tin-coated tubes and the effects on drawing force and surface roughness have been analyzed. The draw force gradually decreases and reaches a minimum value as the tin layer thickness increases from 4.5 to 16.5 μm, while for further increase in layer thickness, the draw force increases again, yielding an optimal tin layer thickness of around 16.5 μm. The drawn tube samples are found to have a superior surface finish with roughness (Ra) as low as 0.165 μm even for the smallest tin coating thickness of around 5 μm while it improves marginally up to 0.134 μm when the tin layer thickness is increased gradually to around 25.7 μm. A sizeable thickness of tin coating is retained on the drawn tube, which enhances the surface appearance as well as corrosion resistance. The tape adhesion test was carried out as per the ASTM D3359 standard and it confirmed the adequacy of adhesion of the coating on the drawn tubes. Also, comparison of draw force variation with the well-known Stribeck curve and the insights into the working mechanism of soft metal as a lubricant are presented.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The author can provide the data used in this study upon request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Swiatkowski K, Hatalkar R (2004) Study of the new floating-plug drawing process of thin walled tubes. J Mater Process Technol 151:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gattmah J, Ozturk F, Orhan S (2017) Experimental and finite element analysis of residual stresses in cold tube drawing process with a fixed mandrel for AISI 1010 steel tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0583-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. USITC (2018) Cold-drawn mechanical tubing from China and India, Publication 4755, United States International Trade Commission (USITC), Investigation Nos. 701-TA-576–577, Washington DC

  4. Naves FO, Buton ST, Caminaga C, Gentile FC (2005) Numerical and experimental analysis of tube drawing with fixed plug. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 27:426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bay N, Azushima A et al (2010) Environmentally benign tribo-systems for metal forming. Ann CIRP-Manuf Technol 59:760–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Groche P, Zang S, Müller C, Bodenmüller D (2015) A study on the performance of environmentally benign lubricants at elevated temperatures in bulk metal forming. J Manuf Process 20:425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrmann C, Cerdas C, Abraham T, Büth L, Mennenga M (2020) Biological transformation of manufacturing as a pathway towards environmental sustainability: Calling for systemic thinking. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnett K (2003) Development of replacements for phoscoating used in forging, extrusion and metal forming processes. National Center for Manufacturing Sciences. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. https://doi.org/10.2172/809127

  9. Bihamta R, Bui QH et al (2012) Application of a new procedure for the optimization of variable thickness drawing of aluminium tubes. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 5:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joun MS, Moon HG et al (2009) Effects of friction laws on metal forming processes. Tribol Int 42:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2008.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang N, Rui M, Juan Z, Zhao J (2013) Calculation method and experimental study of coulomb friction coefficient in sheet metal forming. J Manuf Process 7:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sagisakaa Y, Tamotsu N, KunioH II (2013) Evaluation of environmentally friendly lubricant for aluminum cold forging using friction test based on spline extrusion. J Manuf Process 15:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nowak P, Karolina K, Marian K (2019) Ecological and health effects of lubricant oilsemitted into the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:3002. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16163002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boris Z, Bogdan P (2013) Nanomaterials in lubricants: an industrial perspective on current research. Lubricants 1:95–101. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants1040095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bart JCJ, Emanuele G, Stefano C (2013) Bio-lubricants, bio-lubricants science and technology, Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy

  16. Rodriguez MR, Tomal AM, Totolin V, Remskar M (2019) Performance of nano-lubricants containing MoS2 nanotubes during form tapping of zinc-coated automotive components. J Manuf Process 39:167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He J, Sun J, Meng Y, Pei Y (2020) Superior lubrication performance of MoS2-Al2O3 composite nanofluid in strips hot rolling. J Manuf Process 57:312–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shankara A, Menezes PL, Simha K, Kailas SV (2008) Study of solid lubrication with MoS2 coating in the presence of additives using reciprocating ball-on-flat scratch tester. Sadhana 33:207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-008-0014-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamotsu N, Shigekazu T, Kunio H, Yoshiaki F (2000) A study of the lubrication behavior of solid lubricants in the upsetting process. J Tribol 122:803–808. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1310159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Patil M, Singh V, Bade S, Krishna S (2020) Effect of lubrication technique in tube drawing. Materials Today: Proceedings 28(1):426–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Loffler M, Engel U, Willner K, Beyer F, Merklein M (2018) Investigation of the tribolgocal behaviour of microstructures for controlling the material flow in sheet-bulk metal forming. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 22:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu Z, Bao H, Xing Y et al (2021) Tribological characteristics and advanced processing methods of textured surfaces: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:1241–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06954-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Regalla SP, Anirudh KV, Narela S (2018) Tribological performance of zinc soft metal coatings in solid lubrication. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Engg 346:012–022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/346/1/012022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miyoshi K (2007) Solid lubricants and coatings for extreme environments: state-of-the-art survey. NASA/TM-2007–214668, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio

  25. Zhang ZJ, Simionesie D, Schaschke C (2014) Graphite and hybrid nano materials as lubricant additives. Lubricants 2:44–65. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants2020044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wisander DW (1971) Lead, indium and tin as potential lubricants in liquid hydrogen. NASA/ TN D-6455, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio

  27. Sherbiney MA, Halling J (1977) Friction and wear of ion-plated soft metallic film. Wear 45:211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(77)90075-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patil M, Singh V et al (2021) Tin layer as a solid lubricant for cold tube drawing processes. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00301-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Okamoto N, Wang F, Watanabe T (2004) Adhesion of electrodeposited copper, nickel and silver films on copper, nickel and silver substrates. Mater Trans 45:3330–3333. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.45.3330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. David GD (2018) Surface treatments of selected materials. In Da-Silva LDM, Ochsner A., Adams A.D. (Eds), Handbook of Adhesion Technology, Springer, Charm

  31. Walsh FC, Low CTJ (2016) A review of developments in the electrodeposition of tin. Surf Coat Technol 288:79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.12.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. ASTM D3359 (2014) Standard test methods for measuring adhesion by tape test. Copyright by ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States

  33. Dieter GE, Howard AK, Lee S (2003) Handbook of workability and process design. ASM International, United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1361/hwpd2003p278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Blazynski TZ (1976) Wire, rod and tube drawing. In: Metal forming. Palgrave, ASME international, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02861-0_6

  35. Jacobson BO (2003) The Stribeck memorial lecture. Tribol Int 36:781–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(03)00094-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marcia MM, Deniol KT (2007) Consideration of Stribeck diagram parameters in the investigation on wear and friction behavior in lubricated sliding. Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 29:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782007000100009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bayer RG (1994) Mechanical wear prediction and prevention. Wiley Online Library 31:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.1995.tb00971.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hutchings I, Gee M, Santner E (2006) Friction and wear, In: Czichos H, Saito T, Smith L(eds). Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 685–709

  39. Hirai T, Ishise T (1986) Plastic metal flow under frictional boundary in forward extrusion die and stress distribution of the die. Int Jr Mach Tool Des Res 26:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7357(86)90001-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Joun MS (1999) Iterative and non-iterative schemes for coulomb frictional law in metal forming simulation and their numerical characteristics. Commun Numer Methods Eng 15:515–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0887(199907)15:7%3c515:AID-CNM266%3e3.0.CO;2-A

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Ramezani M, Ripin ZM (2010) A friction model for dry contacts during metal-forming processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2608-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bowden FP, Tabor D (1951) The friction and lubrication of solids. Am J Phys 19:428–430. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1933017

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee CH, Kobayashi S (1973) New solutions to rigid-plastic deformation problems using a matrix method. ASME Trans J Manuf Sci Eng 95:865–873. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3438238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sivaprasad PV, Davies CHJ (2005) An assessment of the interface friction factor using the geometry of upset specimens. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 13:355–600. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/13/3/005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express sincere thanks for the financial support from Tube Investments of India Ltd., Chennai, India, for this research work. In addition to financial support, extensive support was provided for carrying out experimental investigations at the research and development facilities at the company premises. We thoroughly acknowledge all the support received.

Funding

This work has been funded by Tube Investments of India Ltd., Chennai, India, with a research grant worth INR 2.745 million.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, BITS Pilani KK Birla Goa Campus, Goa, India

    Mahesh Patil & Varinder Singh

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, Telengana, India

    Srinivasa Prakash Regalla & Amit Kumar Gupta

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, BITS Pilani Pilani Campus, Pilani, Rajasthan, India

    Tufan Chandra Bera

  4. Corporate Technology Center, Tube Investments of India Ltd, Chennai, India

    Simhachalam Bade & Krishna Srinivas

Authors
  1. Mahesh Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Varinder Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Srinivasa Prakash Regalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amit Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tufan Chandra Bera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Simhachalam Bade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Krishna Srinivas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The corresponding author, MP, has been responsible for conducting the experiments, data collection and analysis, and original draft preparation. VS is responsible for the conceptualization, data analysis, result interpretation, writing and reviewing this paper. SPR, AKG, and TCB have been responsible for the conceptualization, structuring, and revising of this paper. SB and KS are responsible for the experimental setup development, planning, and coordinating the research activities for this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahesh Patil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors consent to publish this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patil, M., Singh, V., Regalla, S.P. et al. Producing high quality cold-drawn steel tubes using an optimal thickness of tin as a tribo-layer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 121, 4663–4675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09537-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09537-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation