Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Time-varying comprehensive evaluation technology of CNC machine tool RMS based on improved ADC model

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quality of CNC (computer numerical control) machine tool is the key to the survival of manufacturing enterprises. How to comprehensively and accurately evaluate its quality is very important for the timely discovery and improvement of machine tool defects. The current research either only evaluates a certain quality characteristic of CNC machine tool, or ignores the dynamic characteristics of CNC machine tool quality, which reduces the accuracy of quality analysis results. To address these problems, firstly, RMS (reliability, maintainability, supportability) was taken as the comprehensive evaluation indexes of CNC machine tool quality characteristics to improve the comprehensiveness of the analysis. Secondly, considering the dynamic characteristics of machine tool reliability, the ADC (availability, dependability, capability) model was improved to obtain a comprehensive quality evaluation index function ERMS with time-varying characteristics. Finally, the characteristics of ERMS were analyzed, and its evaluation criteria were also given. Several CNC machine tools made in China were tracked, and the collected fault data were analyzed by the proposed method. The ERMS of the machine tools was obtained, and its characteristics were analyzed. The results verify the correctness of the proposed method, which provides theoretical basis and technical support for the improvement of the quality of CNC machine tool and the market competitiveness of enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. The State Council (2015) Made in China 2025. Bulletin of the State Council, pp 5–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jia YZ, Wang ML, Jia ZX (1995) Probability distribution of machining center failures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie M, Tang Y, Goh TN (2002) A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 76(3):279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu KM (2015) Optimization methods of aviation equipments MLDT based on queuing theory. Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, China

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jia ZC, Shen GX, Hu ZX et al (2008) Lifetime distribution model and control for CNC lathes based on life cycle. Mach Tool Hydraulics 36:164–167

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu XT, Mao K, Wang XL et al (2020) A modified quality loss model of service life prediction for products via wear regularity. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 204:107187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li DY, Zhang GB, Li MQ et al (2015) Assembly reliability modeling technology based on meta-action. Procedia CIRP 27:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ran Y (2016) Research on meta-action unit modeling and key QCs predictive control technology of electro mechanical products. Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu XT, Ma MZ, He JL (2022) Reliability prediction method of machining precision of machine tool parts based on fuzzy coupling. J Jilin Univ (Eng Technol Ed) 52(2):377–383

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ren LN, Rui ZY, Li JH (2014) Reliability analysis of numerical control machine tools with bounded and bathtub shaped failure intensity. Chin J Mech Eng 50(16):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Byeong M, Suk J (2011) Optimal maintenance policy of repairable system with bathtub shaped intensity. In: 2011 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (ICQR2MSE), pp 431–435

  12. Wang F, Lu Y (2014) A new model for repairable systems with nonmonotone intensity function. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(8):1553–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liao XB (2010) Quantitative modeling and application study of failure rate bathtub curve of machine tool. Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patil RB (2019) Integrated reliability and maintainability analysis of Computerized Numerical Control Turning Center considering the effects of human and organizational factors. J Qual Maint Eng 26(1):87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coulibaly A, Houssin R, Mutel B (2008) Maintainability and safety indicators at design stage for mechanical products. Comput Ind 59(5):438–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li XB, Yang ZJ, Li GF et al (2012) Instantaneous availability modelling of CNC machine tool based on functional data analysis. J Jilin Univ (Eng Technol Ed) 42(5):1151–1156

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y (2012) Research on usability of numerical control lathe. Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wei LH (2011) Coupling modeling and influence analysis for availability of number control machine tools. Jilin University, Changchun, China

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xue YX, Shen GX, Zhang YZ et al (2009) Development and application of availability information analysis system for numerical control machine tool. Manuf Autom 31(4):34–36

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang ZL, Cheng Q, Qi BB et al (2021) A general approach for the machining quality evaluation of S-shaped specimen based on POS-SQP algorithm and Monte Carlo method. J Manuf Syst 60:553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu MG, Wu ZW, Gao F et al (2020) Error modeling and accuracy optimization of rotating ultrasonic vibration assisted EDM machine tool. J Mech Sci Technol 34:2751–2760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang WM, Ruan L, Yu Z et al (1995) KEKAOXING WEIXIUXING BAOZHANGXING CONGSHU. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang ZJ, Liu XD, Zhou YB (2002) Modeling and expanding of reliability and maintainability and supportability effectiveness for equipment. Aeronaut Comput Technique 32(3):42–44

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang J, Li S, He TP et al (2016) Research on the comprehensive evaluation model of helicopter RMS and testability. Syst Eng Electron 38(2):470–475

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fu CL (1996) Using the wseiac model to evaluate the effect of communication systems. J UEST China 25(1):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pan X, Zhang ZY, Zhang ML et al (2019) Research on RMS demonstration method of equipment SoS Based on SoSE. Syst Eng Electron 41(8):1771–1779

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barabadi A, Gudmestad OT, Barabady J (2015) RAMS data collection under Arctic conditions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 135:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eti MC, Ogaji SOT, Probert SD (2007) Integrating reliability, availability, maintainability and supportability with risk analysis for improved operation of the Afam thermal power-station. Appl Energy 84(2):202–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li M, Liu P (2000) Demonstration method and application of weapon equipment development system. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang XG, Li YL, Zhang GB et al (2020) An early fault elimination method of computerized numerical control machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(11–12):5049–5059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang ZM (2011) Reliability assessment and imperfect preventive maintenance for NC machine tools and their applications. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xu BB, Yang ZJ, Chen F et al (2011) Reliability model of CNC machine tools based on non-homogenous Poisson process. J Jilin Univ (Eng Technol Ed) 41(2):210–214

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen DS, Wang TM, Wei HX (2005) Sectional model involving two Weibull distributions for CNC lathe failure probability. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 31(7):766–769

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang ZN, Yang JG, Wang GQ et al (2011) Reliability assessment of multiple NC machine tools with minimal repair. J Harbin Inst Technol 43(7):127–130

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li YL, Zhang XG, Ran Y et al (2021) Early failure modeling and analysis of CNC machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112(9):2731–2754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Guida M, Pulcini G (2009) Reliability analysis of mechanical systems with bounded and bathtub shaped intensity function. IEEE Trans Reliab 58(3):432–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang KN (2015) Research on modeling and applications of life circle failure process of CNC machine. Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shu JS, Guo BB, Zhang JY et al (2008) Research on probability distribution of parameters of rock and soil based on fitting optimization index. J Min Saf Eng 2(25):197–201

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guo S, Zhang WJ (2010) RMS comprehensive evaluation of CNC center based on task effectiveness. J Sichuan Ordnance 31(12):84–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51835001) and the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for “High-grade CNC and Basic Manufacturing Equipment” of China (no. 2018ZX04032-001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225127, China

    Yulong Li, Junfa Li & Donglong Li

  2. AVIC Jonhon Optronic Technology Co., Ltd., Luoyang, Henan, 471003, China

    Shengquan Liu

  3. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China

    Genbao Zhang

Authors
  1. Yulong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shengquan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junfa Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donglong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Genbao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yulong Li analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Donglong Li and Junfa Li were the major contributors in collecting the data. Shengquan Liu simulated the data. Genbao Zhang polished the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yulong Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Liu, S., Li, J. et al. Time-varying comprehensive evaluation technology of CNC machine tool RMS based on improved ADC model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 4175–4182 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09520-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09520-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation