Skip to main content
Log in

Research on online intelligent monitoring system of band saw blade wear status based on multi-feature fusion of acoustic emission signals

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An online intelligent band saw blade wear status monitoring system based on multi-feature fusion of acoustic emission signals is proposed to address the problem about sawing efficiency and quality degradation because of band saw blade wear. Firstly, the acoustic emission raw signal is obtained through the whole life cycle experiment. A variety of features highly correlated to the wear state of the band saw blade are extracted through the study on the wear mechanism of the band saw blade. Secondly, a cost-sensitive support vector machine based multi-feature fusion model of acoustic emission signals is established to implement real-time determination of the wear status of band saw blades. A database for online monitoring of the wear status of band saw blades was established considering the diversity and complexity of sawing parameters, processing materials, and saw machine models in different sawing scenarios. An online intelligent monitoring system based on LabVIEW and MATLAB are established for band saw blade wear status. Validation experiment results show that the online monitoring can achieve an accuracy of 97.71%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig.17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

We confirm that data is open and transparent.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Asiltürk İ, Ünüvar A (2008) Intelligent adaptive control and monitoring of band sawing. In 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference Poznan 967–973 https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPEMC.2008.4635393

  2. Wang YY, Zhang YL, Tan DP, Zhang YC (2021) Key technologies and development trends in advanced intelligent sawing equipments. Chin J Mech Eng 34:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-021-00547-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen HG, Xu Q, Wang JH, Li P, Yuan JL, Lyu BH, Wang JH, Tokunaga K, Yao G, Luo LA, Wu YC (2022) Effect of surface quality on hydrogen/helium irradiation behavior in tungsten. Nucl Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu CQ, Li YG, Zhou GY, Shen WM (2018) A sensor fusion and support vector machine-based approach for recognition of complex machining conditions. J Intell Manuf 29:1739–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1209-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leng S, Wang Z, Min T, Dai ZQ, Chen G (2020) Detection of tool wear in drilling CFRP/TC4 stacks by acoustic emission. J Vibr Eng Technol 9:463–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00190-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou YQ, Xue W (2018) Review of tool condition monitoring methods in milling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:2509–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1768-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ren Q, Balazinski M, Baron L, Jemielniak K, Botez R, Achiche S (2014) Type-2 fuzzy tool condition moni- toring system based on acoustic emission in micro- milling. Inf Sci 255:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang SY, Dornfeld DA (1989) Tool wear detection using time series analysis of acoustic emission. J Eng Ind 111:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3188750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jemielniak K, Kossakowska J, Urbański T (2011) Application of wavelet transform of acoustic emis- sion and cutting force signals for tool condition monitoring in rough turning of Inconel 625. Proce- edings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B J Eng Manuf 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gómez MP, Hey AM, Ruzzante JE, D’Attellis CE (2010) Tool wear evaluation in drilling by acoustic emission. Phys Procedia 3:819–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.01.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Albrecht D, Möhring HC (2018) Potentials for the optimization of sawing processes using the example of band sawing machines. Procedia Manuf 21:567–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu GD, Zhou HC, Chen JH (2018) CNC internal data based incremental cost-sensitive support vector machine method for tool breakage monitoring in end milling. Eng Appl Artif Intell 74:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho S, Asfour S, Onar A, Kaundinya N (2005) Tool breakage detection using support vector machine learning in a milling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuljanic E, Totis G, Sortino M (2009) Development of an intelligent multisensor chatter detection system in milling. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:1704–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tobon-Mejia DA, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N (2012) CNC machine tool’s wear diagnostic and prognostic by using dynamic Bayesian networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:167–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Omid G, Xu JX, Zhou JH, Li X (2012) A physically segmented hidden Markov model approach for continuous tool condition monitoring: diagnostics and prognostics. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 8:964–973. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2012.2205583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C (2011) Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pal M, Foody GM (2010) Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48:2297–2307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2039484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang YN, Zhang HC, Nasrabadi NM, Huang TS (2013) Multi-metric learning for multi-sensor fusion based classification. Inf Fusion 14:431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2012.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Denkena B, Möhring HC, Litwinski KM (2008) Design of dynamic multi sensor systems. Prod Eng Res Devel 2:327–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-008-0102-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Niu G, Yang BS (2010) Intelligent condition monitoring and prognostics system based on data-fusion strategy. Expert Syst Appl 37:8831–8840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei H, Wei LQ, Debela TT, Chen HY, Zhou LB, Yuan JL, Ma Y (2021) Crystallographic orientation effect on the polishing behavior of LiTaO3 single crystal and its correlation with strain rate sensitivity. Ceram Int 48:7766–7777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li ZY, Deng ZH, Ge ZG, Lv LS, Ge JM (2021) A hybrid approach of case-based reasoning and process reasoning to typical parts grinding process intelligent decision. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.2010144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59:717–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhuo RJ, Deng ZH, Chen B, Liu GY, Bi SH (2021) Overview on development of acoustic emission monitoring technology in sawing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07559-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarwar M, Persson M, Hellbergh H (2005) Wear and failure in the bandsawing operation when cutting ball-bearing steel. Wear 259:1144–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.01.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarwar M, Persson M, Hellbergh H (2007) Wear of the cutting edge in the bandsawing operation when cutting austenitic 17–7 stainless steel. Wear 263:1438–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarwar M, Persson M, Hellbergh H (2004) Wear and failure of high-speed steel bimetal bandsaws when cutting ball-bearing steel. Hinduja S. (eds) Proceedings of the 34th International MATADOR Conference 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0647-0_16

  29. Sarwar M, Persson M, Hellbergh H, Haider J (2010) Forces, wear modes, and mechanisms in bandsawing steel workpieces. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 1:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Söderberg S, Åhman L, Svenzon M (1983) A metal- lurgical study of the wear of band-saw blades. Wear 85:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(83)90332-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarwar M, Haider J, Persson M (2011) Scientific evaluation of cutting-off process in bandsawING. Scientific Proceedings 8th Inter- national Congress-Machines, Technologies, Materials, Bulgarien, 29–32. http://mech-ing.com/journal/Archive/2012/1/B_209_Mohammed%20Sarwar.pdf

  32. Reng D (1976) The cutting of metals by bandsawing with special emphasis on the lateral displacement of the blade. Technical University of Munich

  33. Guan S (2011) Technology of classification and forecast of tools wear based on multi-feature analysis and fusion of AE. Jilin University. https://kns.nki.net/kns8/defaultresult/index

  34. Martin R (2001) Noise power spectral density estimation based on optimal smoothing and minimum statistics. IEEE Transactions on speech and audio processing 9:504–512. https://doi.org/10.1109/89.928915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cusidó J, Romeral L, Ortega JA, Espinosa AG (2008) Fault detection in induction machines using power spectral density in wavelet decomposition. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 55:633–643. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2007.911960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen I (2003) Noise spectrum estimation in adverse environments: Improved minima controlled recursive averaging. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 11:466–475. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSA.2003.811544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moreau S, Plantier G, Valière JC, Bailliet H, Simon L (2011) Estimation of power spectral density from laser Doppler data via linear interpolation and deconvolution. Exp Fluids 50:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0905-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marinescu I, Axinte DA (2008) A critical analysis of effectiveness of acoustic emission signals to detect tool and workpiece malfunctions in milling operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1148–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu YC, Hu XF, Yan S, Sun SX (2017) Tool condition monitoring and degradation estimation in rotor slot machining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9706-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dimla DE (2000) Sensor signals for tool-wear monitoring in metal cutting operations-a review of methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00122-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dong D, Zhang XD, Lin LB (2014) Research on relationship between parameters correlation of acoustic emission and rock failure. Sens Transducers 183:147–154. https://www.sensorsportal.com/HTML/DIGEST/december_2014/Vol_183/P_2556.pdf

  42. Snidaro L, García J, Llinas J (2015) Context-based information fusion: A survey and discussion. Inf Fusion 25:16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Widodo A, Yang BS (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:2560–2574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu KP, Wong YS, Hong GS (2009) Wavelet analysis of sensor signals for tool condition monitoring: A review and some new results. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:537–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Special Fund for the Construction of Hunan Innovative Province (Grant No. 2020GK2003), the municipal joint Fund for Natural Science of Hunan Provincial (Grant No. 2021JJ50116), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. U1809221), and Hunan University of Science and Technology and the Bichamp Cutting Technology (Hunan) Co., Ltd. School-enterprise cooperation project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rongjin Zhuo: Conceptualization investigation, writing (original draft), writing (review and editing). Zhaohui Deng: Writing (review and editing), funding acquisition. Bing Chen: Writing (review and editing). Tao Liu: Writing (review and editing). Jinmin: Review and editing. Guoyue Liu: Funding acquisition. Shenghao Bi: Review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaohui Deng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuo, R., Deng, Z., Chen, B. et al. Research on online intelligent monitoring system of band saw blade wear status based on multi-feature fusion of acoustic emission signals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 121, 4533–4548 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09515-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09515-3

Keywords

Navigation