Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of tool attitude error for a steep taper wire-cut electrical discharge machines using multibody approach

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tool attitude error of steep taper wire-cut electrical discharge machines (EDM) is a significant factor affecting the taper angle error of the workpiece. This study investigated a wire EDM machine that can handle 15° taper through the control of U and V axes. A mathematical model of attitude error is established in the coordinate system of machine tools based on the multi-body approach, considering the coupling relation of parts controlling the movement of the wire. It is found that the positioning error is the major factor contributing to the attitude error by studying the effect of each error component of the U and V axes. Furthermore, the positioning errors of the U-axis and V-axis are close to zero from the very beginning during a 100-mm journey and reach maximum values of 30 µm and 28 µm at 100 mm as the moving distance increases. A comparison experiment is conducted for improving the positioning accuracy of the U and V axes. The results show that the decrease in the positioning error can effectively reduce the volumetric attitude error; attitude error was reduced by 36% in the experiment. Therefore, the mathematical model on tool attitude error is validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.

References

  1. Khan MY, Sudhakar Rao P (2019) Electrical discharge machining: vital to manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Technol Exploring Eng 8(11):2278–3075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Slătineanu L, Dodun O, Coteaţă M, Nagîţ G (2020) Irina Beşliu Băncescu, Adelina Hriţuc, Wire electrical discharge machining—a review. Machines 8(4):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gök A (2017) 2D numeric simulation of serrated-chip formation in orthogonal cutting of AISI316H stainless steel. Mater Tehnol 51(6):953–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Md Al-Amin AM, Abdul-Rani RA, Rao TVVLN (2021) Multiple-objective optimization of hydroxyapatite added EDM technique for processing of 316L-steel. Mater Manuf Processes 36(4):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hong Lu, Cheng Q, Zhang X, Qi Liu Yu, Qiao YZ (2020) A novel geometric error compensation method for gantry-moving CNC machine regarding dominant errors 8(8):906

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tang Z, Zhou Y, Wang S, Zhu J, Tang J (2022) An innovative geometric error compensation of the multi-axis CNC machine tools with non-rotary cutters to the accurate worm grinding of spur face gears 169:104664

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo R, Guoqiang Fu, Sun L, Jianzhong Fu (2016) Chebyshev polynomials based parametric modeling of geometric error for CNC machine tools. Trans Chin Soc Agri Mach 47(9):234–241

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arif G, Kadir G (2017) Bilgin Mehmet Burak, Alkan Mehmet Ali, Effects of cutting parameters and tool-path strategies on tool acceleration in ball-end milling. Mater Tehnol 51(6):957–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen G, Liang Y, Sun Y, Chen W, Wang Bo (2013) Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five−axis ultra−precision machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):2525–2534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu W, Wang Z (2010) KazuoYamazaki, Machine tool component error extraction and error compensation by incorporating statistical analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(9):798–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng Q, Zhang Z, Zhang G, Peihua Gu, Cai L (2014) Geometric accuracy allocation for multi−axis CNC machine tool based on sensitivity analysis and reliability theory. J Mech Eng Sci 229(9):1134–1149

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tian W, Liu S, Liu X (2016) Accuracy design of high precision machine tools using error sensitivity analysis methodology. J Mech Eng Sci 232(10):234–243

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng Q, Liu G, Liu Z, Xuan D, Chang W (2012) An identification approach for key geometric error sources of machine tool based on sensitivity analysis. J Mech Eng 48(7):170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Han F, Zhao Ji, Zhang L, Zhao G, Ji S (2012) Synthetical analysis and experimental study of the geometric accuracy of CNC machine tools. J Mech Eng 48(21):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bijaya Bijeta Nayak (2018) Siba Sankar Mahapatra. An intelligent approach for prediction of angular error in taper cutting using wire-EDM, Materials Today: Proceedings 5(2):6121–6127

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Z, Guo J, Cai L (2016) Thermal error compensation of low speed wire−cut electrical discharge machine. J Beijing Univ Technol 42(3):338–345

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan X, Wang H (2007) Feeding error compensation of EDM machine based on finite element analysis. Manuf Technol Mach Tools 4:35–37

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yusron RM, Prasetyo T, Pramudia M (2021) Investigation of involute profile error on spur gear processed using wire EDM. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1125:012119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wenli Yu, Yao X (2015) Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for a five−axis ultra−precision machine tool. Mod Manuf Eng 3:84–89

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J, Zhuang Li, Yan K (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang L, Ding G, Li Z, Zhu S, Qin S (2013) Geometric error model and measuring method based on worktable for five−axis machine tools. J Eng Manuf 227(B1):32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marelli D, Sateesh N, Subbiah R (2020) Review on multi objective optimization of wire cut EDM process parameters using grey relational analysis. Mater Today: Proc 26(2):3124–3130

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marelli D, Singh SK, Nagari S, Subbiah R (2020) Optimisation of machining parameters of wire-cut EDM on super alloy materials–a review. Mater Today: Proc 26(2):1021–1027

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vijay Praveen D, Ranga Raju D, Jagannadha Raju MV (2021) Assessment of optimal parameters of wire EDM on Ni-coated Al2O3p/AA7075 MMCs using PCA Coupled GRA. Arab J Sci Eng 46:7953–7966

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Kang, Y. et al. Analysis of tool attitude error for a steep taper wire-cut electrical discharge machines using multibody approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 4143–4158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09159-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09159-3

Keywords

Navigation