Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-objective modelling and optimal parameter selection of a multi-pass milling process considering uncertain milling stability constraint

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimizing machining parameters and pass numbers under machining stability constraint is important for manufacture engineers planning a multi-pass milling operation. Considering that milling stability varies with the machine tool dynamics when the tool and workpiece position changes, a generalized regression neural network (GRNN) is adopted to obtain the position-dependent stability constraint. Then a multi-objective optimization model of a multi-pass milling is established, where the objectives are the total cutting time (Tc) and surface roughness (Ra) and the variables are the machining position and cutting parameters for each pass. A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is introduced to solve the multi-objective optimization model for providing an optimal Pareto front, from which one satisfactory solution well balancing the Tc and Ra is selected by combining the entropy-weighted algorithm (EWA) and technique for ordering preferences by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). A case study was carried out to establish a multi-objective optimization model after the milling stability constraint and surface roughness were predicted with the aid of GRNN and back-propagation neural network (BPNN), respectively. An ideal solution containing optimal machining position and cutting parameters was solved using NSGA-II, EWA, and TOPSIS, which was compared with solutions of two mono-objective models for optimizing Tc and Ra, respectively, to validate its feasibility. The observed stability and acceptable Ra value of the milling test under the ideal solution also indicated that the proposed optimization method can realize a trade-off between two conflict objectives and fascinate the process planning of a multi-pass milling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this work are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Kiran K, Rubeo M, Kayacan MC, Schmitz T (2017) Two degree of freedom frequency domain surface location error prediction. Precis Eng 48:234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao HR, Yue YT, Chen XF, Zhang XW (2016) Chatter detection in milling process based on synchrosqueezing transform of sound signals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9–12):2747–2755

    Google Scholar 

  3. Özşahin O, Budak E, Özgüven HN (2015) Identification of bearing dynamics under operational conditions for chatter stability prediction in high speed machining operations. Precis Eng 42:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karandikar J, Honeycutt A, Schmitz T, Smith S (2020) Stability boundary and optimal operating parameter identification in milling using Bayesian learning. J Manuf Process 56:1252–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng CY, Miao JG, Ma Y, Wei B, Feng Y (2019) Reliability analysis of chatter stability for milling process system with uncertainties based on neural network and fourth moment method. Int J Prod Res 58(9):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graham E, Mehrpouya M, Nagamune R, Park SS (2014) Robust prediction of chatter stability in micro milling comparing edge theorem and LMI. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Solimanpur M, Ranjdoostfard F (2009) Optimisation of cutting parameters using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 47(21):6019–6036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ic YT, Bru SGE, Cabbaroğlu C, Yüksel ED, Sağlam HM (2018) Optimisation of cutting parameters for minimizing carbon emission and maximising cutting quality in turning process. Int J Prod Res 56(11):4035–4055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang XM, Ding H (2013) Note on a novel method for machining parameters optimization in a chatter-free milling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 72:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leone C, Genna S, Tagliaferri F (2020) Multiobjective optimisation of nanosecond fiber laser milling of 2024 T3 aluminium alloy. J Manuf Process 57:288–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Altintas Y, Merdol SD (2007) Virtual high performance milling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu XH, Zhang HX, Jia ZY, Feng YX, Liang SY (2018) Cutting parameters optimization for MRR under the constraints of surface roughness and cutter breakage in micro-milling process. J Mech Sci Technol 32(7):3379–3388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dongre G, Zaware S, Dabade U, Joshi SS (2015) Multi-objective optimization for silicon wafer slicing using wire-EDM process. Mater Sci Semicond Process 39:793–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gopal PM, Prakash KS (2018) Minimization of cutting force, temperature and surface roughness through GRA, TOPSIS and Taguchi techniques in end milling of Mg hybrid MMC. Measurement 116:178–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leo-Kumar SP (2019) Measurement and uncertainty analysis of surface roughness and material removal rate in micro turning operation and process parameters optimization. Measurement 140:538–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zerti A, Yallese MA, Meddour I, Belhadi S, Haddad A, Mabrouki T (2018) Modeling and multi-objective optimization for minimizing surface roughness, cutting force, and power, and maximizing productivity for tempered stainless steel AISI 420 in turning operations. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102(9–12):135–157

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sahu NK, Andhare AB (2017) Modelling and multiobjective optimization for productivity improvement in high speed milling of Ti–6Al–4V using RSM and GA. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 39(3):5069–5085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Costa DM, Belinato DG, Tarcísio G, Paiva AP, Ferreira RJ, Balestrassi PP (2016) Weighted principal component analysis combined with Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ratio to the multiobjective optimization of dry end milling process: a comparative study. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39(5):1663–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deng ZH, Fu YH, Wan LL, Zhang H (2018) Multi objective optimization of milling process parameters for green high-performance manufacturing. Chin Mech Eng 29(21):2571–2580

    Google Scholar 

  20. Qu S, Zhao JB, Wang TR (2016) Experimental study and machining parameter optimization in milling thin-walled plates based on NSGA-II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5–8):2399–2409

    Google Scholar 

  21. Osman KA, Yilmaz V, Unver HO, Seker U, Kilic SE (2020) Slot milling of titanium alloy with hexagonal boron nitride and minimum quantity lubrication and multi-objective process optimization for energy efficiency. J Clean Prod 258:120739

  22. Rao RV, Pawar P (2010) Parameter optimization of a multi-pass milling process using non-traditional optimization algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 10(2):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baykasolu A (2021) Optimising cutting conditions for minimising cutting time in multi-pass milling via weighted superposition attraction-repulsion (WSAR) algorithm. Int J Prod Res 59(15):4633–4648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li CB, Chen X, Tang Y, Li L (2016) Selection of optimum parameters in multi-pass face milling for maximum energy efficiency and minimum production cost. J Clean Prod 140:1805–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Law M, Altintas Y, Phani AS (2013) Rapid evaluation and optimization of machine tools with position-dependent stability. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 68:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Deng CY, Miao JG, Wei B, Feng Y, Zhao Y (2018) Evaluation of machine tools with position-dependent milling stability based on kriging model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 124:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Özşahin O, Budak E, Özgüven HN (2015) In-process tool point FRF identification under operational conditions using inverse stability solution. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qiao L, Liu Y, Zhu JC (2020) Application of generalized regression neural network optimized by fruit fly optimization algorithm for fracture toughness in a pearlitic steel. Eng Fract Mech 235:107105

  29. Shinde AB, Pawar PM (2017) Multi-objective optimization of surface textured journal bearing by Taguchi based Grey relational analysis. Tribol Int 114:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Q, Wu J, Chen Y, Wang J, Gao S, Wu Z (2020) A new response approximation model of the quadrant detector using the optimized BP neural network. IEEE Sens J 20(8):4345–4352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Su C, Liu Y (2019) Multi-objective imperfect preventive maintenance optimisation with NSGA-II. Int J Prod Res 58(5):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pereira L, Haffner AS, Nicol G, Dias TF (2017) Multiobjective optimization of five-phase induction machines based on NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 64(12):9844–9853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. He YH, Guo HW, Jin MZ, Ren PY (2016) A linguistic entropy weight method and its application in linguistic multi-attribute group decision making. Nonlinear Dyn 84(1):399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rakhshan SA (2017) Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method. J Oper Res Soc 68(4):1–13

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51705058, the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation-funded project under Grant No. 2018M633314, and the Chongqing Special Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. XmT2018040.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Funding acquisition, CY Deng; investigation, J Shu and Y Ma.; methodology, CY Deng, J Shu, and S Lu; software, J Shu, Y Zhao, and JG Miao; experiment, CY Deng and J Shu; writing (original draft preparation), CY Deng, J Shu, and JG Miao; writing (review and editing), CY Deng, Y Ma, and JG Miao; and supervision, CY Deng. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Miao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, C., Shu, J., Ma, Y. et al. Multi-objective modelling and optimal parameter selection of a multi-pass milling process considering uncertain milling stability constraint. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 6225–6240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09142-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09142-y

Keywords

Navigation