Skip to main content
Log in

Material removal thickness: a universal factor determining the evolution of surface roughness in electrochemical polishing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical polishing (ECP) is widely used for scratch- and damage-free finishing of metal components. Though the polishing effect of ECP has been confirmed in many researches, the influence of polishing parameters on evolution of surface roughness is still ambiguous owing to the use of different ECP systems. In this paper, the universal factor determining the evolution of surface roughness during ECP is studied by theoretical analysis as well as experiments. Theoretical analysis based on viscous layer mechanism demonstrates that the material removal thickness is the key parameter governing the roughness evolution of the polished surface regardless of other parameters including the voltage and current and electrolyte concentration. A series of experiments were designed and carried out to verify the proposed hypothesis. Both the experimental results and already published researches proved the validity and universality of the newly developed hypothesis on surface roughness evolution. This work is of great significance for further understanding the finishing mechanism of ECP and process control for its practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Deng H, Endo K, Yamamura K (2015) Competition between surface modification and abrasive polishing: a method of controlling the surface atomic structure of 4H-SiC (0001). Sci Rep 5:8947. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou L, Audurier V, Pirouz P, Powell J (1997) Chemomechanical polishing of silicon carbide. J Electrochem Soc 144:161–163. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837711

  3. Zhai W, Gao B, Chang J, Wang H (2019) Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted polishing SiC through CFD simulation. Nanomanuf Metrol 2:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-018-0033-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murata J, Yodogawa K, Ban K (2017) Polishing-pad-free electrochemical mechanical polishing of single-crystalline SiC surfaces using polyurethane-CeO2 core-shell particles. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 114:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng H, Hosoya K, Imanishi Y, Endo K, Yamamura K (2015) Electro-chemical mechanical polishing of single-crystal SiC using CeO2 slurry. Electrochem Commun 52:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng H, Huang R, Liu K, Zhang XQ (2017) Abrasive-free polishing of tungsten alloy using electrochemical etching. Electrochem Commun 82:80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2017.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Han W, Fang FZ (2019) Fundamental aspects and recent developments in electropolishing. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 139:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ajmal KM, Yi R, Zh ZJ, Ji JW, Zhang XQ, Deng H (2021) Highly efficient smoothing of Inconel 718 via electrochemical-based isotropic etching polishing. Precis Eng 71:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walton HF (1936) The anode layer in the electrolytic polishing of copper. J Electrochem Soc 97:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2777996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoar TP, Mowat JAS (1950) Mechanism of electropolishing. Nature 165:64–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/165064a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimm RD, West AC, Landolt D (1992) AC impedance study of anodically formed salt films on iron in chloride solution. J Electrochem Soc 139:1622–1629. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2069467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matlosz M, Magaino S, Landolt D (1994) Impedance analysis of a model mechanism for acceptor-limited electropolishing. J Electrochem Soc 141:410–418. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2054741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chkhalo NI, Churin SA, Pestov AE, Salashchenko NN, Vainer YA, Zorina MV (2014) Roughness measurement and ion-beam polishing of super-smooth optical surfaces of fused quartz and optical ceramics. Opt Express 22:20094–20106. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.020094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoyo JD, Choi H, Burge JH, Kim GH, Kim DW (2017) Experimental power spectral density analysis for mid- to highspatial frequency surface error control. Appl Opt 56:5258–5267. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.005258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ji JW, Fan W, Gao W, Wang C, Zhang YF, Xu M, Ji F (2019) Investigation of roughness evolution of ion sputtered fused silica surface. Appl Opt 58:5388–5396. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.005388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang F, Zhang X, Deng H (2019) A comprehensive study on electrochemical polishing of tungsten. Appl Surf Sci 475:587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nave MI, Allen JP, Chen-Wiegart Y-C, Wang J, Kalidindi SR, Kornev KG (2015) In situ X-ray nanotomography of metal surfaces during electropolishing. Sci Rep 5:15257. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simka W, Mosiałek M, Nawrat G, Nowak P, Żak J, Szade J, Winiarski A, Maciej A, Warszynska LS (2012) Electrochemical polishing of Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy. Surf Coat Tech 213:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi SG, Kim SH, Choi WK, Lee ES (2016) The optimum condition selection of electrochemical polishing and surface analysis of the stainless steel 316L by the Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:1933–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7404-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance of SUSTech Core Research Facilities.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52035009, 52005243) and the research fund from the Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality (JCYJ20200109141003910), Shenzhen, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Deng.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, J., Khan, .A., Zhan, Z. et al. Material removal thickness: a universal factor determining the evolution of surface roughness in electrochemical polishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 5755–5762 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09129-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09129-9

Keywords

Navigation