Skip to main content
Log in

Ball bearing multiple failure diagnosis using feature-selected autoencoder model

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, with the advance in information technology, pure data-driven approaches such as machine learnings have been widely applied in status diagnosis. However, the accuracy of those predictions strongly relies on the original data, which largely depends on the selected sensors and signal features. Furthermore, for unsupervised machine learning schemes, although it could avoid the concern of labeling in training, it lacks a quantified evaluation of the prediction results. These concerns significantly limit the effectiveness of modern machine learning and thus should be investigated. Meanwhile, ball bearings are fundamental key machine elements in rotating machinery and their condition monitoring should be critical for both quality control and longevity assessment. In this paper, by utilizing ball bearing failure diagnosis as the main theme, the flow of feature selection and evaluation, as well as the evaluation flow for multiple failure diagnosis, is developed for accessing the status of bearings in their imbalance, lubrication, and grease contamination levels based on unsupervised machine learning. The experimental results indicated that with proper feature selection, the failure identification could be more definite. Finally, a novel model based on the second norm to quantify the classification level of each cluster in hyperspace is proposed as the measure for unsupervised machine learning as the basis for performance evaluation and optimization of unsupervised machine learning schemes and should benefit related machine reliability evaluation studies and applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available upon request.

Code availability

Available upon request.

References

  1. Barlow RE, Hunter LC (1960) Optimum preventive main-tenance policies. Oper Res 8:90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pham H, Wang H (1996) Imperfect maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 94:425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang H (2002) A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Eur J Oper Res 139:469–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin J, Liu Y, Grosvenor R (2016) A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia Cirp 52:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang K (2016) Intelligent predictive maintenance (IPdM) system–Industry 4.0 scenario. WIT Trans Eng Sci 113:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zaretsky E, Poplawski J, Miller CR (2000) Rolling bearing life prediction: past, present, and future. NASA Tech Rep 210529

  7. Zaretsky E (2013) Rolling bearing life prediction, theory, and application. NASA Tech Rep 2013-215305

  8. Harris TA, McCool JI (1996) On the accuracy of rolling bearing fatigue life prediction. ASME J Tribol 118:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mishra C, Samantaray A, Chakraborty G (2017) Ball bearing defect models: a study of simulated and experimental fault signatures. J Sound Vib 400:86–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao Q, Duan C, Fan H, Meng Q (2008) Rotating machine fault diagnosis using empirical mode decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:1072–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kankar PK, Sharma SC, Harsha SP (2011) Fault diagnosis of ball bearings using continuous wavelet transform. Appl Soft Comput 11:2300–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoen RR, Habetler TG, Kamran F, Bartfield RG (1995) Motor bearing damage detection using stator current monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 31:1274–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elasha F, Greaves M, Mba D (2018) Planetary bearing defect detection in a commercial helicopter main gearbox with vibration and acoustic emission. Struct Health Monit 17:1192–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu W, Wang Z, Liu X, Zeng N, Liu Y, Alsaadi FE (2017) A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications. Neurocomputing 234:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutrisno E, Oh H, Vasan A, Pecht M (2012) Estimation of remaining useful life of ball bearings using data driven methodologies. Proc Prognostics Health Manag 1–7

  16. Guo L, Li N, Jia F, Lei Y, Lin J (2017) A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing 240:98–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li B, Chow MY, Tipsuwan Y, Hung JC (2000) Neural-network-based motor rolling bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 47:1060–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kankar PK, Sharma SC, Harsha SP (2011) Fault diagnosis of ball bearings using machine learning methods. Expert Syst Appl 38:1876–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ren L, Sun Y, Cui J, Zhang L (2018) Bearing remaining useful life prediction based on deep autoencoder and deep neural networks. J Manuf Syst 48:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu W, Li Y, Cheng Y, Meng D, Liang B, Zhou P (2018) Early fault detection approach with deep architectures. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure 67:1679–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma M, Sun C, Chen X (2018) Deep coupling autoencoder for fault diagnosis with multimodal sensory data. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 14:1137–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deng J, Zhang Z, Eyben F, Schuller B (2014) Autoencoder-based unsupervised domain adaptation for speech emotion recognition. IEEE Signal Process Lett 21(9):1068–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lore KG, Akintayo A, Sarkar S (2017) LLNet: a deep autoencoder approach to natural low-light image enhancement. Pattern Recogn 61:650–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Merrill N, Eskandarian A (2020) Modified autoencoder training and scoring for robust unsupervised anomaly detection in deep learning. IEEE Access 8:101824–101833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shao H, Jiang H, Zhao H, Wang F (2017) A novel deep autoencoder feature learning method for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 95:187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee N, Azarian M, Pecht M (2020) Octave-band filtering for convolutional neural network-based diagnostics for rotating machinery. Ann Conf PHM Soc 12:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun I-C, Cheng R-C, Chen K-S (2021) Evaluation of transducer signature selections on machine learning performance in cutting tool wear prognosis. Int J Adv Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08526-w

  28. Liu Y, Li Z, Xiong H, Gao X, Wu J, Wu S (2013) Understanding and enhancement of internal clustering validation measures. IEEE Trans Cybern 43:982–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng RC, Chen KS, Liu YH, Chang LK, Tsai MC (2021) Development of autoencoder-based status diagnosis method for ball bearing tribology status monitoring. Proc. 9th IIAE International Conference on Industrial Application Engineering 2021 (ICIAE 2021), Kitakyushu, Japan, p. 45–52

  30. Cheng RC (2021) Development of autoencoder-based unsupervised fault recognition method for application in bearing condition diagnosis. Master Thesis, National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan

  31. Schervish MJ (2012) Theory of statistics. Springer Science & Business Media

  32. Jia F, Lei Y, Lu N, Xing S (2018) Deep normalized convolutional neural network for imbalanced fault classification of machinery and its understanding via visualization. Mech Syst Signal Process 110:349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987) Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Subramanian V (2018) Deep learning with PyTorch: a practical approach to building neural network models using PyTorch. Packt Publishing Ltd

  35. Ding Y, Ma L, Ma J, Suo M, Tao L, Cheng Y, Lu C (2019) Intelligent fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using deep Q-network based health state classification: a deep reinforcement learning approach. Adv Eng Inform 42:100977

  36. Pihlgren GG, Sandin F, Liwicki M (2020) Improving image autoencoder embeddings with perceptual loss. Proc. 2020 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), p. 1–7

  37. Abouzid H, Chakkor O (2020) Autoencoders in deep neural network architecture for real work applications: convolutional denoising autoencoders. In Handbook of Research on Recent Developments in Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, IGI Global, p. 214–236

  38. Tsai JM, Sun IC, Chen KS (2021) Realization and performance evaluation of a machine tool vibration monitoring module by multiple MEMS accelerometer integrations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Technical supports from Prof. M-C Tsai of NCKU are also greatly appreciated.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan government with project IDs: 109-2622-8-006-005, 108-2221-E-006-209108-2221-E-006-209, and 110-2221-E-006-172, is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuo-Shen Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors agree with the publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, RC., Chen, KS. Ball bearing multiple failure diagnosis using feature-selected autoencoder model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 4803–4819 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09054-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09054-x

Keywords

Navigation