Skip to main content
Log in

Orthogonal cutting of Wire and Arc Additive Manufactured parts

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work aimed to evaluate whether the established scientific knowledge for machining homogeneous and isotropic materials remains valid for machining additively manufactured parts. The machinability of thin-walled structures produced through two different variants of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) was studied, namely conventional MIG deposition and the innovative hot forging variant (HF-WAAM). Cutting operations were carried out varying the undeformed chip thickness (UCT) and the cutting speed, using a tool rake angle of 25°. A systematic comparison was made between the existing theoretical principles and the obtained practical results of the orthogonal cutting process, where the relation between the material properties (hardness, grain size, yield strength) and important machining outcomes (cutting forces, specific cutting energy, friction, shear stress, chip formation and surface roughness) is addressed. Additionally, high-speed camera records were used to evaluate the generated shear angle and chip formation process during the experimental tests. The machinability indicators shown that, through the appropriate selection of the cutting parameters, machining forces and energy consumption can be reduced up to 12%, when machining the mechanical improved additive manufactured material. Therefore, it has been confirmed the feasibility of machining such materials following the traditional machining principles, without compromising the surface quality requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

taken from the centre zone of the sample produced by: a) conventional WAAM; b) HF-WAAM

Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dilberoglu UM, Gharehpapagh B, Yaman U, Dolen M (2017) The Role of Additive Manufacturing in the Era of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf 11:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding J, Colegrove P, Mehnen J et al (2011) Thermo-mechanical analysis of Wire and Arc Additive Layer Manufacturing process on large multi-layer parts. Comput Mater Sci 50:3315–3322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zalameda JN, Burke ER, Hafley RA et al (2013) Thermal imaging for assessment of electron-beam freeform fabrication (EBF 3) additive manufacturing deposits. Thermosense Therm Infrared Appl XXXV 8705:87050M. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2018233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mueller DH, Mueller H (2000) Experiences using rapid prototyping techniques to manufacture sheet metal forming tools. In Proc. ISATA Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 9:25-27

  5. Levy GN, Schindel R, Kruth JP (2003) Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives. CIRP Ann 52(2):589–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60206-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. King D, Tansey T (2003) Rapid tooling: Selective laser sintering injection tooling. J Mater Process Technol 132:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00257-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oliveira JP, Santos TG, Miranda RM (2020) Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: From theory to practice. Prog Mater Sci 107:100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Powder Bed Fusion (2020) Additive Manufacturing Research Group. Loughborough University. https://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/amrg/about/the7categoriesofadditivemanufacturing/powderbedfusion/. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  9. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:465–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodrigues TA, Duarte V, Miranda RM et al (2019) Current status and perspectives on wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim FH, Moylan SP (2018) Literature Review of Metal Additive Manufacturing Defects. Advanced Manufacturing Series (NIST AMS), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-16

  12. Duarte VR, Rodrigues TA, Schell N et al (2020) Hot forging wire and arc additive manufacturing (HF-WAAM). Addit Manuf 35:101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Geng H, Li J, Xiong J, Lin X (2017) Optimisation of interpass temperature and heat input for wire and arc additive manufacturing 5A06 aluminium alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 22:472–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2016.1259031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dirisu P, Ganguly S, Mehmanparast A et al (2019) Analysis of fracture toughness properties of wire + arc additive manufactured high strength low alloy structural steel components. Mater Sci Eng A 765:138285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, Liu C, Xu T et al (2019) Reducing arc heat input and obtaining equiaxed grains by hot-wire method during arc additive manufacturing titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 742:287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Denlinger ER, Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Palmer TA (2015) Effect of inter-layer dwell time on distortion and residual stress in additive manufacturing of titanium and nickel alloys. J Mater Process Tech 215:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li R, Xiong J (2019) Influence of interlayer dwell time on stress field of thin-walled components in WAAM via numerical simulation and experimental tests. Rapid Prototyp J 25:1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lacalle D, Urbikain G, Pereira O et al (2021) On the relationship between cutting forces and anisotropy features in the milling of LPBF Inconel 718 for near net shape parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 170:103801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopes JG, Machado CM, Duarte VR et al (2020) Effect of milling parameters on HSLA steel parts produced by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). J Manuf Process 59:739–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Teixeira JJP (2001) Fundamentos físicos do corte dos metais. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  21. Suárez A, Veiga F, De LLNL et al (2019) An investigation of cutting forces and tool wear in turning of Haynes 282. J Manuf Process 37:529–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eugenio A, Youyi W (2020) 5-axis milling milling of complex parts with barrel-shape cutting force model and experimental validation model. Procedia Manuf 48:528–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pelayo GU, Trejo DO (2020) Model-based phase shift optimization of serrated end mills : Minimizing forces and surface location error. Mech Syst Signal Process 144:106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodrigues TA, Duarte V, Avila JA et al (2019) Wire and arc additive manufacturing of HSLA steel: Effect of thermal cycles on microstructure and mechanical properties. Addit Manuf 27:440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ELECTRIC L 1.2 mm Solid Wire EN ISO 16834-A AWS (2016). https://www.lincolnelectric.com/assets/global/Products/ConsumableEU_MIGWires-LNM-LNMMoNiVa/lnmmoniva-eng.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2020

  26. Geng H, Li J, Xiong J et al (2018) Formation and improvement of surface waviness for additive manufacturing 5A06 aluminium alloy component with GTAW system. Rapid Prototyp J 24:342–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu Q, Ma Z, Chen G et al (2017) Obtaining fine microstructure and unsupported overhangs by low heat input pulse arc additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 27:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sorger GL, Oliveira JP, Inácio PL et al (2019) Non-destructive microstructural analysis by electrical conductivity: Comparison with hardness measurements in different materials. J Mater Sci Technol 35:360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitutoyo (2010) Quick guide to surface roughness measurement: Reference guide for laboratory and workshop. Mitutoyo Am Corp 1:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hönnige JR, Colegrove P, Williams S (2017) Improvement of microstructure and mechanical properties in Wire + Arc Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V with Machine Hammer Peening. Procedia Eng 216:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Duarte VR, Rodrigues TA, Schell N et al (2021) Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing of High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Adv Eng Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.202001036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Santos TG, Vilaa P, Miranda RM (2011) Electrical conductivity field analysis for evaluation of FSW joints in AA6013 and AA7075 alloys. J Mater Process Technol 211:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2010.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marinescu ID, Rowe WB, Dimitrov B, Ohmori H (2013) Processed materials. Tribology of Abrasive Machining Processes 519–537

  34. Bengtsson AT, Johansson D (2019) Material properties affecting cutting forces. MSc Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology

  35. Sekulič M, Jurkovič Z, Hadžistevič M, Gostimirovič M (2010) The influence of mechanical properties of workpiece material on the main cutting force in face milling. Metalurgija 49:339–342

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nyborg L (2012) Influence of microstructure on wear behaviour of uncoated WC tools in turning of Alloy 718 and Waspaloy. Wear 282–283(12–13):12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sivaraman V, Sankaran S, Vijayaraghavan L (2015) A study on the influence of cutting parameters on forces during machining the multiphase V-microalloyed steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6921-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Boothroyd G, Knight W (1989) Fundamentals of machining and machine Tools. Kingston, Rhode Island

  39. Agapiou J (2016) Metal cutting theory and practice, 3rd Edition. Abingdon, UK

  40. Balogun VA, Mativenga PT (2015) Specific energy based characterisation of tool wear in mechanical machining processes. Int J Sci Eng Res 6(5):1674–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Silva LR, Abrão AM, Faria P, Davim JP (2012) Machinability study of steels in precision orthogonal cutting. Mater Res 15:589–595. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392012005000071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Berezvai S, Molnar TG, Bachrathy D, Stepan G (2018) Experimental investigation of the shear angle variation during orthogonal cutting. Mater Today Proc 5:26495–26500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.08.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Varga G (2012) Examination of Shear Angle in Metal Cutting. Journal of Production Processes and Systems 6(1):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  44. Choi MS (1995) A study of shear angle relationships in shearing process on the shear plane and the rake face in orthogonal cutting. KSME J 9:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02953637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Okida J, Moriguchi H, Nishioka T, Yoshimura H (2009) Observations on orthogonal cutting processes - Effect of friction between tool and work material. Key Eng Mater 389–390:169–174. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.389-390.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Engineering ToolBox (2004) Friction - Friction Coefficients and Calculator. [online] Available at: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/friction-coefficients-d_778.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2020

  47. Astakhov V (2019) Tribology of cutting tools. Elsevier Science

    Google Scholar 

  48. ASME (2009) Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay). ASME Stand B461

  49. Polishetty A, Shunmugavel M, Goldberg M et al (2017) Cutting force and surface finish analysis of machining additive manufactured titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Procedia Manuf 7:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fernández-Abia AI, Barreiro J, De Lacalle LNL (2012) Martínez-Pellitero S (2012) Behavior of austenitic stainless steels at high speed turning using specific force coefficients. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:505–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3846-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Barelli F, Wagner V, Laheurte R et al (2020) Orthogonal cutting of TA6V alloys with chamfered tools : Analysis of tool – chip contact lengths. J Eng Manuf 13:2384–2395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416629589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Saito Y, Yamaguchi T, Itagaki R et al (2017) Effect of coefficient of friction at the sliding zone of chip-tool interface on chip curl diameter and secondary shear zone thickness during tapping process. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao ZJ, To S, Zhuang ZX (2019) Serrated chips formation in micro orthogonal cutting of Ti6Al4V alloys with equiaxial and martensitic microstructures. Micromachines. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10030197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to extend their thanks the Portuguese Military Academy Research Center (CINAMIL) for the support provided to high-speed image acquisition.

Funding

The authors acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT-MCTES) for its financial support via the project UIDB/00667/ 2020 (UNIDEMI) and by the project CARAVELA (POCI-01–0247-FEDER-039796) under the Competitiveness and Internationalization Operational Program, Regional Operational Program for Lisbon FEDER and Portugal 2020. VD acknowledges FCT-MCTES for funding the PhD grant SFRH/BD/139454/2018. TAR acknowledges FCT-MCTES for funding the PhD grant SFRH/BD/144202/2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Pedro P. Fonseca contributed to conceptualization, investigation, measurement, data curation and writing and original draft preparation. Catarina Vidal wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript. Francisco Ferreira participated in materials characterization. Valdemar R. Duarte was involved in production and characterization of the HF-WAAM samples. Tiago A. Rodrigues took part in the production of the WAAM samples. Telmo G. Santos supervised the study, and wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript. Carla M. Machado took part in conceptualization, supervision and writing and original draft preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro P. Fonseca.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors declare that the present study is original, without any kind of plagiarism and/or inappropriate data manipulation/falsification form, and has not been divided in several parts. The authors also declare that the work reported in this paper has not been published previously, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in English or in any other language.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that they consent the publication of the work reported in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fonseca, P.P., Vidal, C., Ferreira, F. et al. Orthogonal cutting of Wire and Arc Additive Manufactured parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119, 4439–4459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08678-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08678-3

Keywords

Navigation