Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accurate prediction of the bead geometry in wire arc additive manufacturing process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of the main process parameters on the geometry of the bead deposited during WAAM using MIG welding technology. A campaign of experimental tests was conducted using a design of experiments approach. The campaign was conducted under a wide range of processing conditions up to a deposition rate of 22 kg/h. Geometrical characterization of the weld bead was performed by optical microscopy and 3D reconstruction techniques. The key geometrical features of the beads and suitable processing windows were identified. The experimental measurements of the cross-sectional profile of the weld bead were compared with common approximation models. A new model based on a circular approximation was proposed. The results demonstrated that the circular approximation showed better agreement with the experimentally measured profiles than the commonly adopted parabolic approximation. This commonly adopted model was fully unable to describe the weld bead profile under medium–large deposition rates. Under these conditions, the parabolic approximation predicted taller and larger weld bead profiles as compared to the experimental measurements. On the other hand, the circular profile showed much better agreement with the experimental profiles within the entire experimental window. A semi-empirical model capable of predicting the bead cross section given the deposition parameters was developed. The model showed good reliability and agreement with the experimental measurement. Consequently, this model would represent a compelling tool to select the process parameters to achieve more precise geometries during WAAM processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Oliveira JP, LaLonde AD, Ma J (2020) Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 193:108762

  2. Baumers M, Dickens P, Tuck C, Hague R (2016) The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 102:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabernero Ai, Alvarez P, Suarez A (2018) Study on Arc Welding Processes for High Deposition Rate Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 68:358–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dawes J, Bowerman R, Trepleton R (2015) Introduction to the Additive Manufacturing Powder Metallurgy Supply Chain, Johnson Matthey. Technol Rev 59:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lopes JG, Machado CM, Duarte VR, Rodrigues TA, Santos TG, Oliveira JP (2020) Effect of milling parameters on HSLA steel parts produced by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). J Manuf Process 59:739–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeng Z, Cong BQ, Oliveira JP, Ke WC, Schell N, Peng B, Qi ZW, Ge FG, Zhang W, Ao SS (2020) Wire and arc additive manufacturing of a Ni-rich NiTi shape memory alloy: Microstructure and mechanical properties. Addit Manuf 32:101051

  7. Rodrigues TA, Duarte VR, Tomás D, Avila JA, Escobar JD, Rossinyol E, Schell N, Santos TG, Oliveira JP (2020) In-situ strengthening of a high strength low alloy steel during Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). Addit Manuf 34:101200

  8. Wu B, Pan Z, Ding D, Cuiuri D, Li H, Xu J, Norrish J (2018) A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. J Manuf Process 35:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodrigues TA, Duarte V, Miranda RM, Santos TG, Oliveira JP (2019) Current Status and Perspectives on Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). Materials 12

  10. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) A multi-bead overlapping model for robotic wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). Robot Comput Integr Manuf 31:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Colegrove PA, Martina F, Roy MJ, Szost BA, Terzi S, Williams SW, Withers PJ, Jarvis D (2014) High Pressure Interpass Rolling of Wire + Arc Additively Manufactured Titanium Components. Adv Mat Res 996:694–700

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Y, Li F, Chen S, Lu Z (2019) Unit block–based process planning strategy of WAAM for complex shell–shaped component. Int J Adv Manuf Syst 104:3915–3927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yildiz AS, Davut K, Koc B, Yilmaz O (2020) Wire arc additive manufacturing of high-strength low alloy steels: study of process parameters and their influence on the bead geometry and mechanical characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:3391–3404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Manokruang S, Vignat F, Museau M, Limousin M (2020) Process parameters effect on weld beads geometry deposited by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). In: International Joint Conference on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Advanced Manufacturing, Aix-en-Provence, France

  15. Dinovitzer M, Chen X, Laliberte J, Huang X, Frei H (2019) Effect of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process parameters on bead geometry and microstructure. Addit Manuf 26:138–146

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abe T, Sasahara H (2019) Layer geometry control for the fabrication of lattice structures by wire and arc additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 28:639–648

    Google Scholar 

  17. Venkatarao K (2021) The use of teaching-learning based optimization technique for optimizing weld bead geometry as well as power consumption in additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 279:123891

  18. Kumar A, Maji K (2020) Selection of Process Parameters for Near-Net Shape Deposition in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing by Genetic Algorithm. J Mater Eng Perform 29:3334–3352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H, van Duin S, Larkin N (2016) Bead modelling and implementation of adaptive MAT path in wire and arc additive manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 39:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiong J, Zhang G, Hu J, Wu L (2012) Bead geometry prediction for robotic GMAW-based rapid manufacturing through a neural network and a second-order regression analysis. J Intell Manuf 25:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiong J, Zhang Y, Pi Y (2020) Control of deposition height in WAAM using visual inspection of previous and current layers. J Intell Manuf

  22. Zhang W, Ding C, Wang H, Meng W, Xu Z, Wang J (2021) The Forming Profile Model for Cold Metal Transfer and Plasma Wire-Arc Deposition of Nickel-Based Alloy. J Mater Eng Perform

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Lambiase.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lambiase, F., Scipioni, S.I. & Paoletti, A. Accurate prediction of the bead geometry in wire arc additive manufacturing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119, 7629–7639 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08588-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08588-w

Keywords

Navigation