Skip to main content
Log in

Error model of a precision two-dimensional fixture

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study established an error model based on the normal vector of the machining surface to optimize the structure design of a special fixture for the ultra-precision process of single-crystal germanium two-dimensional drum. Aiming to analyze and reduce the angle error of the drum machining surface, the model includes 10 error items affecting the fixture’s accuracy, such as bearing error and encoder error. It can analyze the repeated positioning error of the fixture and intuitively predict the angle error of the machining surface of the drum. According to existing fixture error data, we used the Monte Carlo method to predict the fixture’s repeated positioning error and related angle errors. We conducted the verification by measuring the repeated positioning accuracy of the fixture and the angle error of the drum processing surfaces, which have machining on the fixture. The results show that the difference between the actual measurement results and the predicted results is 32″. The predicted angle error of the drum processing surfaces is consistent with the actual measurement. According to the sensitivity analysis of each error factor and error component, the error factors influence the fixture error and the angle error of the drum processing surfaces. Finally, we put forward the optimal design scheme of the fixture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The test data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

  1. Ni Y, Zhang B, Sun Y, Zhang Y (2016) Accuracy analysis and design of A3 parallel spindle head. Chin J Mech Eng 29:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu Y, Zhang L, Wang S, Du H, Chai B, Hu SJ (2015) Active precision design for complex machine tools: methodology and case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo S, Mei X, Jiang G (2019) Geometric accuracy enhancement of five-axis machine tool based on error analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Genbao HQZ (2013) Precision design for machine tool based on error prediction. Chin J Mech Eng 26:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Wan M, Xing W-J, Xiao Q-B, Zhang W-H (2018) Generalized actual inverse kinematic model for compensating geometric errors in five-axis machine tools. Int J Mech Sci 145:299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang H, Yang H, Huang X, Huang X, Ding S, Ding S, Yu C, Yu C, Yang Y, Yang Y (2018) Identification and compensation of 11 position-independent geometric errors on five-axis machine tools with a tilting head. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:533–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei X, Gao F, Li Y, Zhang D (2018) Study on optimal independent variables for the thermal error model of CNC machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi JP, Lee SJ, Kwon HD (2003) Roundness error prediction with a volumetric error model including spindle error motions of a machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:923–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu G, Fu J, Xu Y, Chen Z (2014) Product of exponential model for geometric error integration of multi-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:1653–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ding S, Huang X, Yu C, Wang W (2017) Actual inverse kinematics for assembly error compensation of 5-axis CNC machine tools. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 23:2156–2163

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niu P, Cheng Q, Liu Z, Chu H (2021) A machining accuracy improvement approach for a horizontal machining center based on analysis of geometric error characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:2873–2887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rolfe BF, Cardew-Hall MJ, Abdallah SM, West GAW (2001) Geometric shape errors in forging: developing a metric and an inverse model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 215:1229–1240

  13. Chen G, Liang Y, Sun Y, Chen W, Wang B (2013) Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:2525–2534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang WT, Wang JQ, Shi GQ (2011) Positioning accuracy analysis of precision turntable for diamond fly-cutting two-dimensional drum machining. New Technol New Technol 11:40–42

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang DY (2015) Analysis and research on positioning error of precision turntable for 2D rotary drum machining. Changchun Univ Sci Technol

  16. Ding S, Huang X, Yu C, Wang W (2016) Actual inverse kinematics for position-independent and position-dependent geometric error compensation of five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 111:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou B, Wang S, Fang C, Sun S, Dai H (2017) Geometric error modeling and compensation for five-axis CNC gear profile grinding machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:2639–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu B, Yin Y, Zhang Y, Luo M (2019) A new approach to geometric error modeling and compensation for a three-axis machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:1249–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Cai L, Cai L, Cheng Q, Cheng Q, Liu Z, Liu Z, Gu P, Gu P (2019) A geometric error budget method to improve machining accuracy reliability of multi-axis machine tools. J Intell Manuf 30:495–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kong LB, Cheung CF, To S, Lee WB, Du JJ, Zhang ZJ (2008) A kinematics and experimental analysis of form error compensation in ultra-precision machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1408–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J, Zhuang L, Yan K (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang G, Dai Y, Lai Z (2021) A novel force-based two-dimensional tool centre error identification method in single-point diamond turning. Precis Eng 70:92–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yao H, Li Z, Zhao X, Sun T, Dobrovolskyi G, Li G (2016) Modeling of kinematics errors and alignment method of a swing arm ultra-precision diamond turning machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xuebing Han: conceptualization; formal analysis; validation; writing–original draft; writing–review & editing. Weidong Feng: investigation; methodology; writing–original draft; writing–review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, X., Feng, W. Error model of a precision two-dimensional fixture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 4033–4043 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08570-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08570-6

Keywords

Navigation