Skip to main content
Log in

Material characteristics evaluation for DC04-welded tube hydroforming

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tube hydroforming (THF) technology is widely applied especially in the automotive and aircraft industries. Material characteristics of tubular workpieces should be evaluated in terms of bending and THF processes. A mathematical model, which combines the assumption of the elliptical contour of a bulged wall and the prediction equation of wall thickness, was designed to analyze the THF process and to obtain the strain–stress relationship of tubes. Material characteristics of a DC04-welded tube were obtained by using a self-designed THF test machine. Considering the effects of pre-work hardening, the material strain–stress relationships of the tube and original sheet blank were discussed. An approximate determination method was proposed to obtain the stress–strain curve of the tube by using the curve of the original sheet blank and the hardness of the tube and sheet blank. A suitable constitutive equation with pre-work hardening was applied to the DC04-welded tubes through simulation and experimental methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors guarantee no restriction of availability of data, material, and code.

Abbreviations

\(L\) :

Length of the bulging region

\(R\) :

Initial radius of the tube

\({t}_{0}\) :

Initial wall thickness

\({t}_{b}\) :

Thickness of point b

\({h}_{i}\) :

Bulging height

\({R}_{a}\) :

Radius of the elliptic contour in the x-axis

\({R}_{b}\) :

Radius of the elliptic contour in the y-axis

\({R}_{r}\) :

Radius of the die

\({P}_{i}\) :

Internal bulging pressure

\({P}_{\varphi }\) :

Meridian radius of curvature

\({\sigma }_{ST}\) :

Yield strength of the tube

\({\sigma }_{SB}\) :

Yield strength of the sheet blank

\({\sigma }_{\varphi }\) :

Stress in meridian direction

\({\sigma }_{\theta }\) :

Stress in circumferential direction

\({\sigma }_{t}\) :

Stress in normal direction

\(\tilde{\sigma }\) :

Equivalent stress

\({\varepsilon }_{\varphi }\) :

Strains in meridian direction

\({\varepsilon }_{\theta }\) :

Strains in circumferential direction

\(T\left({x}_{i},{y}_{i}\right)\) :

Tangent point coordinates of the bulging region contour and mold contour

\({\upvarepsilon }_{t}\) :

Strains in normal direction

\(\overline{\varepsilon }\) :

Equivalent strain

\({\rho }_{\theta }\) :

Circumferential radius of curvature

\({H}_{T}\) :

Vickers hardness of the tube

\({H}_{B}\) :

Vickers hardness of the sheet blank

References

  1. Bell C, Corney J, Zuelli N, Savings D (2019) A state of the art review of hydroforming technology: its applications, research areas, history, and future in manufacturing. Int J Mater Form (1–3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01507-1.

  2. Dayyani I, Shaw AD, Flores EIS, Friswell MI (2015) The mechanics of composite corrugated structures: a review with applications in morphing aircraft. Compos Struct 133(1):358–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dohmann F, Hartl C (1996) Hydroforming-a method to manufacture light-weight parts. J Mater Process Technol 60:669–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun L, Lin CY, Fan ZG, Li H, Yao SJ, Wang GD, Chu GC (2019) Experimental and numerical investigation on axial hydro-forging sequence of 6063 aluminum alloy tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:2869–2877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04447-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Li HW, Liu Y, Li LY, Sun C (2018) “Size effect” related hydroforming characteristics of thin-walled 316-L bellow considering pressure change. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1–4):505–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2280-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee MG, Korkolis YP, Kim JH (2015) Recent developments in hydroforming technology. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 229:572–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414548463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitu L, Boudeau N, Malécot P, Michel G, Buteri A (2018) Evaluation of models for tube material characterization with the tube bulging test in an industrial setting. Int J Mater Form 11:671–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1380-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sokolowski T, Gerke K, Ahmetoglu M, Altan T (2000) Evaluation of tube formability and material characteristics: hydraulic bulge testing of tubes. J Mater Process Technol 98:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00303-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Strano M, Altan T (2004) An inverse energy approach to determine the flow stress of tubular materials for hydroforming applications. J Mater Process Technol 146:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Velasco R, Boudeau N (2008) Tube bulging test: theoretical analysis and numerical validation. J Mater Process Technol 205:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang YM, Lin YK (2006) Analysis of tube bulge forming in an open die considering anisotropic effects of the tubular material. Int J Mach Tool Manu 46:1921–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang YM, Lin YK, Altan T (2007) Evaluation of tubular materials by a hydraulic bulge test. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ouirane B, Boudeau N, Velasco R, Michel G (2011) Error evaluation on experimental stress–strain curve obtained from tube bulging test. Thin-Walled Struc 49:1217–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muammer K, Aul Y, Altan T (2001) On the characteristics of tubular materials for hydroforming-experimentation and analysis. Int J Mach Tool Manu 41:761–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00070-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan SJ, Hu ZL, Wang XS (2012) Evaluation of formability and material characteristics of aluminum alloy friction stir welded tube produced by a novel process. Mater Sci Eng A 543:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalfallah A (2014) Experimental and numerical assessment of mechanical properties of welded tubes for hydroforming. Mater Des 56:782–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zribi T, Khalfallah A, BelHadjSalah H (2013) Experimental characterization and inverse constitutive parameters identification of tubular materials for tube hydroforming process. Mater Des 49:866–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He ZB, Yuan SJ, Lin YL, Wang XS, Hu WL (2014) Analytical model for tube hydro-bulging tests, part I: models for stress components and bulging zone profile. Int J Mech Sci 87:97–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suttner S, Merklein M (2016) Experimental and numerical investigation of a strain rate controlled hydraulic bulge test of sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 235:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khalfallah A, Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Zribi T, Belhadjsalah H, Menezes LF (2015) Mechanical characterization and constitutive parameter identification of anisotropic tubular materials for hydroforming applications. Int J Mech Sci 104:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cui XL, Yuan SJ (2016) Determination of mechanical properties of anisotropic thin-walled tubes under three-dimensional stress state. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5–8):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8526-3.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Kai Yang, Mr. Yisheng Zhang, Mr. Xiaowei Ma, and Dr. Ningyu Ben for providing detailed experimental data. The authors gratefully thank the Instrument Analysis Center of the Xi’an Jiaotong University for assistance with the SEM operation.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFB1106400), by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875441), and by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (Nos. xtr012019004 and zrzd2017027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The publisher has the permission of the authors to publish the given article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, L., Zhang, Q. & Han, B. Material characteristics evaluation for DC04-welded tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119, 7075–7088 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08527-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08527-9

Keywords

Navigation