Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of burr height in ultrasonic-assisted drilling of DD6 superalloy

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DD6 nickel-based superalloy is a typical refractory material, and has important applications in the aviation industry. Ultrasonic-assisted drilling can greatly enhance the processability of refractory materials. The presence of burrs will affect assembly, and the extra process to remove burrs will reduce production efficiency and increase production costs. Compared with conventional drilling, ultrasonic-assisted drilling can distinctly reduce the burr height. It is very necessary to model and predict the burr height of ultrasonic-assisted drilling. A prediction model of exit burr for ultrasonic-assisted micro drilling is proposed. A new thrust force model is developed by considering the dynamic cutting speed, dynamic cutting thickness, and the acoustic softening effect. The newly established ultrasonic-assisted drilling thrust force model was used to modify the conventional drilling burr height model, and the burr height was calculated. The accuracy of the model is verified by ultrasonic-assisted drilling experiments under different feed rates, spindle speeds, frequencies, amplitudes, and point angles of the bit. The minimum error of the average burr height prediction value is 4.5%, and the maximum error is 17.7%. The model has great significance in the prediction of burr height in ultrasound-assisted micro-hole drilling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Abbreviations

f z :

Feed per revolution (mm/r)

n :

Spindle speed (r/s)

t :

Time (s)

f :

Vibration frequency (Hz)

A :

Amplitude (μm)

t a :

Axial uncut chip thickness (mm)

t i :

Instantaneous uncut chip thickness (mm)

ϕ:

Half-point angle (°)

r :

Radial distance of the drill bit (mm)

h :

Helix angle (°)

F n :

Normal force (N)

F f :

Friction force (N)

A c :

Area of the uncut chip (mm2)

K n :

Specific normal force (N/mm2)

K f :

Specific friction force (N/mm2)

v c :

Cutting speed (mm/s)

α n :

Normal rake angle (°)

i :

Inclination angle (°)

l chi :

Length of the chisel edge (mm)

ηc :

Chip flow angle (°)

ψ:

Chisel edge angle (°)

dF mcut :

Elemental cutting force in main cutting edge (N)

dF mthu :

Elemental oblique cutting thrust force in main cutting edge (N)

dF mlat :

Elemental lateral force in main cutting edge (N)

dF ccut :

Elemental cutting force in chisel edge (N)

dF cthu :

Elemental thrust force in chisel edge (N)

v p :

Poisson’s ratio of the workpiece material

ω:

Circular frequency (rad/s)

s :

Wave velocity

E :

Young’s modulus

F r c cin :

Reduction in indentation force (N)

k :

Constant related to material

F ccin :

Indentation force in conventional drilling (N)

F zTotal :

Total thrust force in ultrasonic assisted drilling (N)

F cin :

Indentation force in ultrasonic assisted drilling (N)

f(t):

Instantaneous feed rate (mm/s)

ΔW T :

Total work

ΔW th :

Work for drilling

ΔW df :

Work for material deformation

h 0 :

Critical thickness (mm)

R :

Radius of the bit (mm)

εab :

Logarithmic strain

V :

Volume of the deformed material (mm3)

σy :

Yield strength (Mpa)

Δθ:

Bending angle (rad)

εp :

Effective plastic strain

εf :

Fracture strain

H :

Burr height (mm)

%R.A. :

Percentage of material area reduction at tensile fracture

SP :

Sensitivity percentage

Δf(x i):

Change rate of burr height

References

  1. Peng Y, Li J, Peng X, Li S, Xiong J, Shi J (2020) Interfacial microstructure evolution and formation process of the joints prepared by diffusion bonding on DD6 nickel-based single crystal superalloy. J Mater Sci Technol 9:16317–16328

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pei H, Wen Z, Yue Z (2017) Long-term oxidation behavior and mechanism of DD6 Ni-based single crystal superalloy at 1050°C and 1100°C in air. J Alloy Compd 704:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu Q, Zhang Y (2020) Precipitation and growth simulation of γ′ phase in single crystal superalloy DD6 with multiphase-field method and explicit nucleation algorithm. Metals 10:1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giasin K, Ayvar-Soberanis S (2017) An investigation of burrs, chip formation, hole size, circularity and delamination during drilling operation of GLARE using ANOVA. Compos Struct 159:745–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biermann D, Hartmann H (2012) Reduction of burr formation in drilling using cryogenic process cooling. Procedia CIRP 3:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Z, Zhu L, Lin B, Zhang G, Ni C, Sui T (2019) The grinding force modeling and experimental study of ZrO2 ceramic materials in ultrasonic vibration assisted grinding. Ceram Int 45:8873–8889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kandi R, Sahoo SK, Sahoo AK (2020) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted turning of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V: numerical and experimental investigations. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 42(8):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fang B, Yuan Z, Li D, Gao L (2021) Effect of ultrasonic vibration on finished quality in ultrasonic vibration assisted micromilling of Inconel718. Chinese J Aeronaut 34:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Makhdum F, Jennings LT, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2012) Cutting forces in ultrasonically assisted drilling of carbon fibre-reinforced plastics. J Phys Conference series 382:12019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Makhdum F, Phadnis VA, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Effect of ultrasonically-assisted drilling on carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics. J Sound Vib 333:5939–5952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alam K, Mitrofanov AV, Silberschmidt VV (2011) Experimental investigations of forces and torque in conventional and ultrasonically-assisted drilling of cortical bone. Med Eng Phys 33:234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang X, Yu T, Wang W, Zhao J (2019) Improved analytical prediction of burr formation in micro end milling. Int J Mech Sci 151:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aziz M, Ohnishi O, Onikura H (2012) Innovative micro hole machining with minimum burr formation by the use of newly developed micro compound tool. J Manuf Process 14:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dornfeld D, Min S (2010) A review of burr formation in machining. Burrs-analysis, control and removal, 3–11

  15. Jin SY, Pramanik A, Basak AK, Prakash C, Shankar S, Debnath S (2020) Burr formation and its treatments—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 107:2189–2210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillespie LK, Blotter PT (1976) The formation and properties of machining burrs. Journal of Engineering for Industry 98:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chern G, Dornfeld DA (1996) Burr/Breakout model development and experimental verification. J Eng Mater-T ASME 118:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sung-Lim K, Dornfeld DA (1996) Analysis of fracture in burr formation at the exit stage of metal cutting. J Mater Process Tech 58:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pramanik A, Basak AK, Uddin MS, Shankar S, Debnath S, Islam MN (2019) Burr formation during drilling of mild steel at different machining conditions. Mater Manuf Process 34:726–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ko SL, Chang JE, Kaipakjian S (2003) Development of drill geometry for burr minimization in drilling. CIRP Ann 52:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Varatharajulu M, Loganathan C, Baskar N (2015) Influence of cutting parameters on burr height and burr thickness in drilling of duplex 2205 using solid carbide. Int J Chemtech Res 8:768–777

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rezende B, Silveira M, Vieira L, Abrão A, Faria P, Rubio J (2016) Investigation on the effect of drill geometry and pilot holes on thrust force and burr height when drilling an Aluminium/PE sandwich material. Materials 9:774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim J, Dornfeld DA (2002) Development of an analytical model for drilling burr formation in ductile materials. J Eng Mater-T ASME 124:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang SSF, Bone GM (2010) Burr height model for vibration assisted drilling of aluminum 6061–T6. Precis Eng 34:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bu Y, Liao WH, Tian W, Shen JX, Hu J (2016) An analytical model for exit burrs in drilling of aluminum materials. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 85:2783–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li S, Zhang D, Liu C, Tang H (2020) Exit burr height mechanistic modeling and experimental validation for low-frequency vibration-assisted drilling of aluminum 7075–T6 alloy. J Manuf Process 56:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zai P, Tong J, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Song C, Zhao B (2021) Analytical model of exit burr height and experimental investigation on ultrasonic-assisted high-speed drilling micro-holes. J Manuf Process 68:807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Flachs JR, Salahshoor M, Melkote SN (2014) Mechanistic models of thrust force and torque in step-drilling of Al7075-T651. Prod Eng Res Devel 8:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gong Y, Lin C, Ehmann KF (2005) Dynamics of initial penetration in drilling: part 1—mechanistic model for dynamic forces. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME 127:280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Anand RS, Patra K, Steiner M, Biermann D (2017) Mechanistic modeling of micro-drilling cutting forces. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 88:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang H, Ding W, Chen Y, Laporte S, Xu J, Fu Y (2019) Drilling force model for forced low frequency vibration assisted drilling of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Mach Tool Manu 146:103438

  32. Mao Q, Coutris N, Rack H, Fadel G, Gibert J (2020) Investigating ultrasound-induced acoustic softening in aluminum and its alloys. Ultrasonics 102:106005

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51775443), National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2017-VII-0015–0111), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M683569). National Natural Science Foundation of China,51775443,Wenhu Wang,National Science and Technology Major Project,2017-VII-0015–0111,Wenhu Wang,China Postdoctoral Science Foundation,2020M683569,Yifeng Xiong

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiaoxiang Zhu: experiment and manuscript writing. Wenhu Wang: project administration and funding acquisition. Ruisong Jiang: review and editing. Yifeng Xiong: review and editing. Xiaofen Liu: review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yifeng Xiong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal for simultaneous consideration. The submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere in any form or language.

Consent to participate

All authors voluntarily agree to participate in this research study.

Consent for publication

All authors voluntarily agree to publish in this research study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Wang, W., Jiang, R. et al. Modeling of burr height in ultrasonic-assisted drilling of DD6 superalloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 2167–2181 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08524-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08524-y

Keywords

Navigation