Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of saturation peening on shape and residual stress distribution after peen forming

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peen forming is a die-less forming method that has been applied to aircraft wings and rocket tanks; the surface of a metal plate is deformed convexly by plastic strain when it is peened with multiple steel balls at less than 100% coverage. To introduce uniform compressive residual stress over the entire surface of the plate, additional saturation peening may be performed at 100% or more coverage, unlike peen forming. Changes in deformation and residual stress distribution owing to saturation peening after peen forming were investigated by dynamic explicit and static implicit finite element method (FEM). The FEM results were validated experimentally. The plastic strain introduced during saturation peening was affected by the plastic strain and compressive residual stress after peen forming on the peen-forming surface and by the compressive residual stress generated by the bending moment after peen forming on the back surface. The application of double-sided saturation peening had no effect on curvature and improved the compressive residual stress near the surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data generated and simulated during this study are included in this paper.

References

  1. Baughman DL (1970) Peen forming. Mach Des 42:156–160

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burmeister TJ (1984) Peen forming of airfoil shapes for aircraft wing sections. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Shot Peening pp. 1–5

  3. Kopp R, Wüstefeld F (1990) Modern simulation and optimization of peen forming processes. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Shot Peening pp. 561–572

  4. Hornauer KP, Kohler W (1990) Development of the peen forming process for spherical shaped components. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Shot Peening pp. 585–594

  5. Wang YJ, Xiao XD, Wang JB, Zhang W, Qiao WM (2014) Finite element simulation on shot peen forming the wing panel of commercial aircraft C919. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Shot Peening pp. 342–347

  6. Meyer R, Reccius H, Schülein R (1987) Shot peen-forming of NC-machined parts with integrated stringers using large balls. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Shot Peening pp. 327–334

  7. Yamada T, Takahashi H, Ikeda M, Sugimoto S, Ohta T (2002) Development of shot peening for wing integral skin for continental business jets. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd Tech Rev 39(2):57–61

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guagliano M (2001) Relating Almen intensity to residual stresses induced by shot peening. a numerical approach. J Mater Process Technol 110(3):277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00893-1

  9. Han K, Owe DRJ, Peric D (2002) Combined finite/discrete element and explicit/implicit simulations of peen forming process. Eng Comp 19(1):92–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400210413667

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kopp R, Schulz J (2002) Flexible Sheet forming technology by double-sided simultaneous shot peen forming. CIRP Ann 51(1):195–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61498-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohta T, Sato Y (2021) Numerical analysis of peen forming for high-strength aluminum alloy plates. Mater Trans 62(6):846–855. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.P-M2021818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levers A, Prior A (1998) Finite element analysis of shot peening. J Mater Process Technol 80–81(1):304–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00188-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang T, Platts MJ, Levers A (2006) A process model for shot peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 172(2):159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang T, Platts MJ, Wu J (2008) The optimisation of shot peen forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 206(1–3):78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Lévesque M (2011) Numerical simulation of the stress peen forming process and experimental validation. Adv Eng Softw 42(11):963–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gariépy A, Larose S, Perron C, Lévesque M (2011) Shot peening and peen forming finite element modelling – towards a quantitative method. Int J Solid Struct 48(20):2859–2877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gariépy A, Cyr J, Levers A, Perro C, Bocher P, Lévesque M (2012) Potential applications of peen forming finite element modelling. Adv Eng Softw 52:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gariépy A, Larose S, Perron C, Bocher P, Lévesque M (2013) On the effect of the orientation of sheet rolling direction in shot peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 213(6):926–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao X, Wang Y, Zhang W, Wang J, Wei S (2014) Numerical simulation of stress peen forming with regular indentation. Procedia Eng 81:867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pierre A, Faucheux F, Gosselin P, Lévesque M (2018) Simulating shot peen forming with eigenstrains. J Mater Process Technol 254:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramati S, Levasseur G, Kennerknecht S (1999) Single piece wing skin utilization via advanced peen forming technology. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Shot Peening 1999062

  22. Ishigami H, Matsui K, Jin Y, Ando K (2008) A study on stress, reflection and double shot peening to increase compressive residual stress. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 23(11):959–963. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00329.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ishigami H, Matsui K, Jin Y, Ando K (2000) Stress double shot peening to improve residual stress distribution (The effect of pre-tensile stress and peening angle on residual stress distribution). Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng Series A 66(648):1547–1554. https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaia.66.1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klemenz M, Schulze V, I. Rohr I, Löhe D (2009) Application of the FEM for the prediction of the surface layer characteristics after shot peening. J Mater Process Technol 209:4093–4102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.001

  25. Rahmaan T, Noder J, Abedini A, Zhou P, Butcher C (2020) Anisotropic plasticity characterization of 6000- and 7000-series aluminum sheet alloys at various strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 135:03390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Levesque M (2009) On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw 40:1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.01

  27. Ohta T, Tsutsumi S, Ma N (2021) Direct measurement of shot velocity and numerical analysis of residual stress from pneumatic shot peening. Surf Interfaces 22:100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ohta T, Ma N (2020) Measurement of shot velocity using particle image velocimetry and numerical analysis of residual stress at two shot peening conditions. Mech Eng J 7(4):20–00152. https://doi.org/10.1299/mej.20-00152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gangaraj SMH, Guagliano M, Farrahi GH (2014) An approach to relate shot peening finite element simulation to the actual coverage. Surf Coat Technol 243(2014):39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohta T, Tsutsuni S, Ma N (2019) Numerical analysis of shot peening with incident angle. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 60(256):256–261. https://doi.org/10.9773/sosei.60.256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiao X, Li Y, Sun Y, Zhao P, Li Y, Gao G (2020) Prediction of peen forming stress and curvature with dynamic response of compressively prestressed target. J Mater Eng Perform 29:3079–3091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04851-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tanaka K (2019) The cos α method for X-ray residual stress measurement using two-dimensional detector. Mech Eng Rev 6–1:18–00378. https://doi.org/10.1299/mer.18-00378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moore MG, Evan WP (1958) Mathematical correction for stress in removed layers in X-ray diffraction residual stress analysis. SAE Trans 66:6340–6345. https://doi.org/10.4271/580035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kulkarni KM, Schey JA, Badger DV (1981) Investigation of shot peening as a forming process for aircraft wing skins. J Appl Metalwork 1(4):34–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 20K05158.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Prime Mover Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokai University, 4-1-1 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, 259-1292, Japan

    Takahiro Ohta

  2. Course of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School, Tokai University, Now, Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 4-1-1 Kitakaname, Kanagawa, 259-1292, Hiratsuka, Japan

    Yoshihiro Sato

Authors
  1. Takahiro Ohta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshihiro Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Takahiro Ohta: investigation and writing. Yoshihiro Sato: experiment.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Ohta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohta, T., Sato, Y. Effect of saturation peening on shape and residual stress distribution after peen forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119, 4659–4675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08473-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08473-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation