Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling for a small-hole drilling process of engineering plastic PEEK by Taguchi-based neural network method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineering plastics have specific properties in strength, hardness, impact resistance, and aging persistence, often used for structural plates and electronic components. However, the holes made by the drilling process always shrink after the cutting heat dispersion due to their high thermal expansion coefficient. Drilling parameters must be discussed thoughtfully especially in the small-hole fabrication to acquire a stable hole quality. This study developed parameter models by the Taguchi-based neural network method to save the experimental resources on the drilling of engineering plastic, polyetheretherketone (PEEK). A three-level full-factorial orthogonal array experiment, L27, was first conducted for minimizing the thrust force, hole shrinkage in diameter, and roundness error. In terms of the network modeling, four variables were designated to the input layer neurons included the three drilling parameters (spindle speed, depth of peck-drilling, feed rate) and the thrust force detected, and that of the output layer neurons were two hole characteristics of diameter shrinkage and roundness. The models were trained by a stepped-learning procedure to expand the network’s field information stage by stage. After three stages of training, the models developed can provide precise simulations for the network’s training sets. For the non-trained cases, the prediction accuracy of the hole’s characteristics discussed was below 1 μm in the drilling of a 1-mm-diameter hole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data have been presented in the manuscript.

References

  1. Choi YJ, Park MS, Chu CN (2008) Prediction of drill failure using features extraction in time and frequency domains of feed motor current. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(1):29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Esim E, Yıldırım Ş (2017) Drilling performance analysis of drill column machine using proposed neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 28:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2322-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roth JT, Djurdjanovic D, Yang X, Mears L, Kurfess T (2010) Quality and Inspection of Machining Operations: Tool Condition Monitoring. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 132(4):041015–410516. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hyacinth Suganthi X, Natarajan U, Ramasubbu N (2015) A review of accuracy enhancement in midrodrilling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:199–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6900-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zerti A, Yallese MA, Meddour I, Belhadi S, Haddad A, Mabrouki T (2019) Modeling and multi-objective optimization for minimizing surface roughness, cutting force, and power, and maximizing productivity for tempered stainless steel AISI 420 in turning operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2984-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Özden G, Öteyaka MO, Cabrera FM (2021) Modeling of cutting parameters in turning of PEEK composite using artificial neural networks and adaptive-neural fuzzy inference systems. J Thermoplast Compos Mater OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057211013070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel SAA, Pugazhenthi R, Kumar R, Vijayananth S (2019) Multi objective prediction and optimization of control parameters in the milling of aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites using ANN and Taguchi-grey relational analysis. Def Technol 15(4):545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yadav RN, Yadava V, Singh GK (2013) Multi-objective optimization of process parameters in Electro-Discharge Diamond Face Grinding based on ANN-NSGA-II hybrid technique. Front Mech Eng 8:319–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0269-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biswas R, Kuar AS, Biswas SK, Mitra S (2009) Artificial neural network modeling of Nd:YAG laser microdrilling on titanium nitride alumina composite. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 224(3):473–482. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarıkaya M, Yılmaz V (2018) Optimization and predictive modeling using S/N, RSM, RA and ANNs for micro-electrical discharge drilling of AISI 304 stainless steel. Neural Comput & Applic 30:1503–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2775-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar SPL, Jerald J, Kumanan S, Prabakaran RA (2014) Review on current research aspects in tool-based micromachining processes. Mater Manuf Process 29(11–12):1291–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2014.952037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harun MHS, Ghazali MF, Yusoff AR (2017) Analysis of tri-axial force vibration sensors for detection of failure criterion in deep twist drilling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3535–3545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9344-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh AP, Sharma M, Singh I (2013) A review of modeling and control during drilling of fiber reinforced plastic composites. Composites: Part B 47:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.038

  14. Patra K, Jha AK, Szalay T, Ranjan J, Monostori L (2017) Artificial neural network based tool condition monitoring in micro mechanical peck drilling using thrust force signals. Precis Eng 48:279–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Efkolidis N, Hernández CG, Talón JH, Kyratsis P (2018) Modelling and prediction of thrust force and torque in drilling operations of Al7075 using ANN and RSM methodologies. J Mech Eng Sci 64(6):351–361. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2017.5188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kharwar PK, Verma RK, Singh A (2020) Neural network modeling and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for optimization of drilling performances in polymer nanocomposites. J Thermoplastic Composite Materials, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705720939165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Corne R, Nath C, Mansori MEl, Kurfess T (2017) Study of spindle power data with neural network for predicting real-time tool wear/breakage during inconel drilling. J Manuf Syst 43(2):287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soepangkat BOP, Norcahyo R, Khoirul Effendi M, Pramujati B (2020) Multi-response optimization of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) drilling using back propagation neural network-particle swarm optimization (BPNN-PSO). Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 23(3):700–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ulas HB, Ozkan MT, Malkoc Y (2019) Vibration prediction in drilling processes with HSS and carbide drill bit by means of artificial neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 31:5547–5562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3379-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Caggiano A, Angelone R, Napolitano F, Nele L, Teti R (2018) Dimensionality reduction of sensorial features by principal component analysis for ANN machine learning in tool condition monitoring of CFRP drilling. Procedia CIRP 78:307–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vrabel M, Maňková I, Beňo J (2016) Monitoring and control of manufacturing process to assist the surface workpiece quality when drilling. Procedia CIRP 41:735–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akıncıoğlu S, Mendi F, Çiçek A, Akıncıoğlu G (2013) ANN-based prediction of surface and hole quality in drilling of AISI D2 cold work tool steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4719-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cruz CED, Aguiar PR, Machado ÁR, Bianchi EC, Contrucci JG, Neto FC (2013) Monitoring in precision metal drilling process using multi-sensors and neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4314-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mondal N, Mandal S, Mandal MC (2020) FPA based optimization of drilling burr using regression analysis and ANN model. Measurement 152:107327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahn Y, Lee SH (2017) Classification and prediction of burr formation in micro drilling of ductile metals. Int J Prod Res 55(17):4833–4846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1254355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Freeman JA, Skapura DM (1991) Neural networks: algorithms, application, and programming techniques. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts (chapter 3)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Fowlkes WY, Creveling CM (1984) Engineering methods for robust product design: using taguchi methods in technology and product development. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, chapter 4 and chapter 5

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in the writing, read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Hung Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

The authors declare that they all consent to participate this research.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that they all consent to publish the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Fig. 12
figure 12

Models’ performance presented by correlation coefficient in the first-stage training: (a) 4 × 5 × 5 × 2, (b) 4 × 10 × 10 × 2. (c) 4 × 15 × 15 × 2, and (d) 4 × 20 × 20 × 2

Appendix 2

Fig. 13
figure 13

Models’ performance presented by correlation coefficient in the second-stage training: (a) 4 × 10 × 10 × 2, (b) 4 × 15 × 15 × 2, and (c) 4 × 20 × 20 × 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, DY., Lin, CH. & Wu, XY. Modeling for a small-hole drilling process of engineering plastic PEEK by Taguchi-based neural network method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119, 5777–5795 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08431-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08431-2

Keywords

Navigation