Skip to main content
Log in

Development and application of a mold clamping mechanism for improving dimensional accuracy of vacuum casting parts and reducing mold production cost

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vacuum casting (VC) is a highly versatile manufacturing technique capable of producing parts in a wide range of polymers for end use plastic parts or prototypes. VC technology is ideally suited to low volume batch production compared with plastic injection molding since a silicone rubber mold (SRM) can be used to produce up to fifty to eighty parts. The main challenge of this method is that the both dimensional and form accuracies of the VC parts were affected by the fastening force of the SRM using tape due to the fastening force is inconsistent for different operators. In this study, an intelligent SRM clamping mechanism comprising a pressure sensor and Arduino pressure sensing module was developed for reducing the variations in both dimensional and form accuracies of the VC parts. It was found that the 14 kPa is the optimal clamping pressure. The angular deviation of the cuboid VC parts produced by the intelligent clamping mechanism falls within the range of one standard deviation (SD) to the average. The minimum zone circle deviation of the cylinder VC parts produced by the intelligent clamping mechanism falls within the range of − 1 to 2 SDs. In addition, the production cost of the SRM can further be reduced by about 23% using an intelligent clamping mechanism compared with that using the conventional method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo C, Liu X, Liu G (2021) Surface finishing of FDM-fabricated amorphous polyetheretherketone and its carbon-fiber-reinforced composite by dry milling. Polymers 13:2175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guerra Silva R, Torres MJ, Zahr Viñuela J (2021) A Comparison of miniature lattice structures produced by material extrusion and vat photopolymerization additive manufacturing. Polymers 13:2163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tey WS, Cai C, Zhou K (2021) A comprehensive investigation on 3D printing of polyamide 11 and thermoplastic polyurethane via multi jet fusion. Polymers 13:2139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosales JM, Cejudo C, Verano L, Casas L, Mantell C, Martínez de la Ossa EJ (2021) Supercritical impregnation of PLA filaments with mango leaf extract to manufacture functionalized biomedical devices by 3D printing. Polymers 13:2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vidakis N, Petousis M, Velidakis E, Tzounis L, Mountakis N, Korlos A, Fischer-Griffiths PE, Grammatikos S (2029) On the mechanical response of silicon dioxide nanofiller concentration on fused filament fabrication 3D printed isotactic polypropylene nanocomposites. Polymers 2021:13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuo CC, Jiang ZF, Yang XY et al (2020) Characterization of a direct metal printed injection mold with different conformal cooling channels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:1223–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuo C-C, Chen W-H (2021) Improving cooling performance of injection molding tool with conformal cooling channel by adding hybrid fillers. Polymers 13:1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin C-C, Chen K-C, Yeh H-C (2020) Influence of heat sink on the mold temperature of gypsum mold used in injection molding. Polymers 12:701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalami H, Urbanic RJ (2019) Design and fabrication of a low-volume, high-temperature injection mould leveraging a ‘rapid tooling’ approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:3797–3813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagalkot A, Pons D, Symons D, Clucas D (2021) Analysis of raised feature failures on 3D printed injection moulds. Polymers 13:1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salamati M, Soltanpour M, Fazli A (2020) Processing and tooling considerations in joining by forming technologies; part B—friction-based welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:4023–4081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanbur BB, Suping S, Duan F (2020) Design and optimization of conformal cooling channels for injection molding: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:3253–3271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manso CS, Thom S, Uhlmann, E et al (2020) Investigation of micromilled tool steel H13 using tungsten carbide microend mills. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:1179–1189

  14. Zhang X, Zhang HG, Zhang ZY, Hu QX (2014) Process parameter prediction of differential pressure vacuum casting based on support vector machine. Key Eng Mater 621:633–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong XP, Huang NY, Wu SS (2005) Newly developed vacuum differential pressure casting of thin-walled complicated Al-alloy castings. China Acad J 2:102–107

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhan SA, Song JT, Ding MH, Guo J, Liu HH (2017) A study of thin-walled ZL105A casting manufactured by vacuum differential pressure casting. Adv Eng Res 135:574–582

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aguilar-Navarro JA, González-López JR, Hernández-Sandoval J et al (2020) Innovative methodology for measuring residual stress in engine blocks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:3649–3658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim J, Yamada Y, Yokota S (2020) Micro ECF (electro-conjugate fluid) hydraulic power sources based on the modular design of TPSEs (triangular prism and slit electrode pairs). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:627–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vita A, Castorani V, Germani M et al (2019) Comparative life cycle assessment and cost analysis of autoclave and pressure bag molding for producing CFRP components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:1967–1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuo C, Lin J (2019) A cost-effective method for rapid manufacturing polymer rapid tools used for liquid silicone rubber injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:1159–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thian SCH, Tang Y, Tan WK, Fuh JYH, Wong YS, Loh HT, Lu L (2008) The manufacture of micromould and microparts by vacuum casting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(9–10):944–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang HG, Hu QX (2016) Study of the filling mechanism and parameter optimization method for vacuum casting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5–8):711–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao DY, Huang ZP, Wang MJ, Wang T, Jin Y (2012) Vacuum casting replication of micro-riblets on shark skin for drag-reducing applications. J Mater Process Technol 212(1):198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Puerta APV, Sanchez DM, Batista M, Salguero J (2018) Criteria selection for a comparative study of functional performance of fused deposition modelling and vacuum casting processes. J Manuf Process 35:721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuo C, Liu H, Chang C (2020) Optimization of vacuum casting process parameters to enhance tensile strength of components using design of experiments approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:3775–3785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuo C, Qiu W, Liu H et al (2019) Filling mechanism for prototype parts produced by vacuum differential pressure casting technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:1469–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuo C, Qiu W (2019) Effect of differential pressure on the transcription rate of micro-featured components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:1229–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuo C-C, Nguyen T-D, Zhu Y-J, Lin S-X (2021) Rapid development of an injection mold with high cooling performance using molding simulation and rapid tooling technology. Micromachines 12:311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under contract nos. MOST 110–2221-E-131–023 and MOST 109–2637-E-131–004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Chil-Chyuan Kuo: wrote the paper/conceived and designed the analysis/performed the analysis/conceptualization.

Hsueh-An Liu/Hong-Yi Lu, Pi-Rong Shi: collected the data/contributed data or analysis tools.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chil-Chyuan Kuo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, CC., Liu, HA., Lu, HY. et al. Development and application of a mold clamping mechanism for improving dimensional accuracy of vacuum casting parts and reducing mold production cost. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118, 1577–1588 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08029-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08029-8

Keywords

Navigation