Skip to main content
Log in

Contact stiffness attenuation model of bolted joint based on time-varying uncertainty

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various deterministic and uncertain factors are widely present in mechanical equipment and their working conditions. Attenuation of the contact stiffness of bolted joints caused by bolt loosening will directly affect the dynamic characteristics of the joint surface and the working state of the equipment. This paper proposes a contact stiffness attenuation model that considers time-varying uncertainty of the bolt pre-tightening force as a theoretical basis for designing the initial bolt pre-tightening force and secondary tightening strategies. First, the microscopic contact mechanism of the bolted joint surface was revealed, and then a joint contact load and contact stiffness model based on Hertz contact theory and fractal theory was established. A nonlinear mechanical model of the bolted contact surface was obtained. Considering the decrease in bolt pre-tightening force during service, a contact stiffness attenuation law for bolted joints is explored, and a model of the connection reliability of group bolt joints with time-varying uncertainty is established. The bolt pre-tightening force of a railway locomotive was taken as an example and the connection reliability of group bolt structures was predicted, and it is defined that the bolted structure fails when the contact stiffness drops to 80% of the initial value, and the reliability of the group bolts will drop sharply on the 15th day after service, and will almost completely fail on the 22nd day. The proposed theory improves the accuracy of contact modeling and provides a new direction for bolt tightening strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors declare that all date and material support their published claims and comply with field standards.

References

  1. Zhang ZL, Cheng Q, Qi BB, Tao ZQ (2021) A general approach for the machining quality evaluation of S-shaped specimen based on POS-SQP algorithm and Monte Carlo method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 60:553–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng Q, Qi BB, Liu ZF, Zhang CX, Xue DY (2019) An accuracy degradation analysis of ball screw mechanism considering time-varying motion and loading working conditions. Mechanism and Machine Theory 134:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Niu P, Cheng Q, Liu ZF, Chu HY (2021) A machining accuracy improvement approach for a horizontal machining center based on analysis of geometric error characteristics. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technolog 112:2873–2887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06565-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin TT, Yan CL, Chen CH et al (2021) New domain adaptation method in shallow and deep layers of the CNN for bearing fault diagnosis under different working conditions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2021:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07385-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwood J, Williamson J (1996) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 295(1442):300–319. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1966.0242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo X, Ma BB, Zhu YC (2017) A magnification-based multi-asperity (MBMA) model of rough contact where the Greenwood-Williamson and Persson theories meet. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=66d3e221c923c3c8f273e247d67ade27&site=xueshu_se&hitarticle=1

  7. Wang W, Wu J, Gao Z et al (2018) A calculation model for tangential contact damping of machine joint interfaces. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 50(003):633–642. https://doi.org/10.6052/0459-1879-17-425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu ST, Huang WF, Shi X, Peng ZK, Liu XF (2019) Review on mechanical seals using a bi-Gaussian stratified surface theory. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 55(01):103–117. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2019.01.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Persson B (2007) Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. Journal of Chemical Physics 115(8):3840–3861. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1388626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao YS, Xu JJ, Cai LG et al (2016) Stiffness and damping model of bolted joint based on the modified three-dimensional fractal topography. ARCHIVE Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 1989-1996:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406216631577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan Y, Chen J, Zhang L (2018)Loading-unloading contact model between three-dimensional fractal rough surfaces. Aip Advances 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5027437

  12. Liang A, Bian Y, Chen Q et al (2019) Fractal prediction model for the contact of friction surface and simulation analysis. 2019 8th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM):189–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITM.2019.8710745

  13. Liu Z, Jiang K, Zhang C et al (2020) A stiffness model of a joint surface with inclination based on fractal theory. Precision Engineering-Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology 62:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibrahim R, Pettit C (2005) Uncertainties and dynamic problems of bolted joints and other fasteners. Journal of Sound and Vibration 279(3-5):857–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.11.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Langer P, Sepahvand K, Guist C et al (2017) Finite element modeling for structural dynamic analysis of bolted joints under uncertainty. Procedia Engineering 199:954–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jalali H, Khodaparast H, Madinei H, Friswell MI (2019) Stochastic modelling and updating of a joint contact interface. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 129:645–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mandal B, Chakraborty S, Chakrabarti A (2019) A hybrid approach for global sensitivity analysis of FRP composite multi-bolt joints. Composite Structure 208:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Askri R, Bois C, Wargnier H et al (2018) Tolerance synthesis of fastened metal-composite joints based on probabilistic and worst-case approaches. Computer-Aided Design 100:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2018.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qiao S, Pilipchuk V, Ibrahim R (2001) Modeling and simulation of elastic structures with parameter uncertainties and relaxation of joints. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 123(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1325409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang W, Wang Z, An L (2016) The uncertainty of bolted joint slippage effects on the inner force of lattice transmission towers. Structural Engineers 32(4):42–50

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guo Q, Zhang L (2005) Identification of the mechanical joint parameters with model uncertainty. Chinese journal of aeronautics 18(1):47-52. JournalArticle/5aee8f5 3c095d710d417bc9a

  22. Qin QZ, Guo QT, Zhan M, Ma H (2019) Finite element model validation of bolted connection structure basing thin layer element method. Structure & Environment Engineering 46(6):41-50. CNKI:SUN:QDHJ.0.2019-06-007

  23. Li K, Zeng J, Yu M (2020) Analysis of frequency response function of flanged cylindrical shell structure considering stiffness uncertainty of bolted connection. Journal of vibration engineering 2020(3):517–524

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu ZF, Jiang K, Dong XM et al (2020) A research method of bearing coefficient in fasteners based on the fractal and Florida theory [J]. Tribology International 152:106544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao YS, Yang C, Cai LG, Shi WM, Hong Y (2015) Stiffness and damping model of bolted joint with uneven surface contact pressure distribution. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2016.3410

  26. Zhang X, Wang N, Lan G et al (2014) Tangential damping and its dissipation factor models of joint interfaces based on fractal theory with simulations. Journal of Tribology 136(1):011704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1990) Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. Trans Asme J Tribology 112(2):205–216. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2920243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taiyuan. (2000) Fractal model of the normal contact stiffness of machine joint surfaces based on the fractal contact theory. China mechanical engineering. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=4a84fb17d01b1df82fb056ae9e10a3a1&site=xueshu_se&hitarticle=1

  29. Wang SX, He JL, Li GF, Hao QB, Huang H (2021) Compilation method of CNC lathe cutting force spectrum based on kernel density estimation of G-SCE. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2021:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07541-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao Y, Wang L, Wu H, Chu HY, Liu ZF (2021) Time carying reliability method based on linearized nataf transform. Quality and Reliability Engineering 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2836

  31. Shi BQ, Shen YH (2018) Mechanical time-varying uncertainty design. China

  32. Zhen H, Li HF, Du XP et al (2013)Simulation-based time-dependent reliability analysis for composite hydrokinetic turbine blades. Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization 47(5):765–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0839-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang XD, Miao XM (2014) A complete contact model of a fractal rough surface. Wear: an International Journal on the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear 309:146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gong CQ, Frangopol DM (2019) An efficient time-dependent reliability method. Structural Safety 81:101864.1–101864.7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52075012)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors on this list contributed to this article.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declared no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nana, N., Yongsheng, Z., Congbin, Y. et al. Contact stiffness attenuation model of bolted joint based on time-varying uncertainty. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 3847–3856 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07957-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07957-9

Keywords

Navigation