Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental and simulated comparison of finite element models of bimetallic sheets for deep drawing process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, different techniques used for modelling of bimetallic sheets by finite element (FE) method have been compared. Sheets modelled with five different assumptions were compared with each other and experimental data to determine the FE model that gives the most realistic result. FE models were created with the assumption that the adhesion was excellent or separable and with the case that the solidified adhesive in the intermediate layer was modelled and not modelled. As a result, the closest values to the experimental results were obtained with the model created with the assumption that there is a solidified adhesive layer in the middle layer and there is an adhesion interface between this layer and metallic layers. On the other hand, when the adhesive is not modelled in the middle layer, it has been observed that the solution time is reduced by 2.6 times while small changes are seen in the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors shared all data and materials in manuscript.

Code availability

Code available and can be share if necessary.

References

  1. Mori T, Kurimoto S (1996) Press-formability of stainless steel and aluminum clad sheet. J Mater Process Technol 56:242–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen C-Y, Kuo J-C, Chen H-L, Hwang W-S (2006) Experimental investigation on earing behavior of aluminum/copper bimetal sheet. Mater Trans 47:2434–2443. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.47.2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morovvati MR, Fatemi A, Sadighi M (2011) Experimental and finite element investigation on wrinkling of circular single layer and two-layer sheet metals in deep drawing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aghchai AJ, Shakeri M, Dariani BM (2013) Influences of material properties of components on formability of two-layer metallic sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:809–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Afshin E, Kadkhodayan M (2015) An experimental investigation into the warm deep-drawing process on laminated sheets under various grain sizes. Mater Des 87:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takuda H, Mori K, Fujimoto H, Hatta N (1996) Prediction of forming limit in deep drawing of Fe/Al laminated composite sheets using ductile fracture criterion. J Mater Process Technol 60:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parsa MH, Yamaguchi K, Takakura N (2001) Redrawing analysis of aluminum–stainless-steel laminated sheet using FEM simulations and experiments. Int J Mech Sci 43:2331–2347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00038-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bagherzadeh S, Mirnia MJ, Mollaei Dariani B (2015) Numerical and experimental investigations of hydro-mechanical deep drawing process of laminated aluminum/steel sheets. J Manuf Process 18:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marandi FA, Jabbari AH, Sedighi M, Hashemi R (2016) An experimental, analytical, and numerical investigation of hydraulic bulge test in two-layer Al–Cu Sheets. J Manuf Sci Eng 139:031005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakhtemanian MR, Honarpisheh M, Amini S (2017) Numerical and experimental study on the layer arrangement in the incremental forming process of explosive-welded low-carbon steel/CP-titanium bimetal sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3781–3796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1462-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karajibani E, Hashemi R, Sedighi M (2017) Forming limit diagram of aluminum-copper two-layer sheets: numerical simulations and experimental verifications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:2713–2722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9585-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tseng H-C, Hung C, Huang C-C (2010) An analysis of the formability of aluminum/copper clad metals with different thicknesses by the finite element method and experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:1029–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasan Nejad SJ, Hasanzadeh R, Doniavi A, Modanloo V (2017) Finite element simulation analysis of laminated sheets in deep drawing process using response surface method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:3245–3259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0780-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Atrian A, Fereshteh-Saniee F (2013) Deep drawing process of steel/brass laminated sheets. Compos Part B Eng 47:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu J, Xue W (2013) Formability of AA5052/polyethylene/AA5052 sandwich sheets. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 23:964–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62553-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu J, Zhuang L (2018) Cylindrical cup-drawing characteristics of aluminum-polymer sandwich sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:1885–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abaqus Manual (2007) Abaqus/explicit: user’s examples and theory manuals. Dassault systemes

  18. Liu J, Liu W, Xue W (2013) Forming limit diagram prediction of AA5052/polyethylene/AA5052 sandwich sheets. Mater Des 46:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM D1876-08 (2015) Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  20. Papazafeiropoulos G, Muñiz-Calvente M, Martínez-Pañeda E (2017) Abaqus2Matlab: A suitable tool for finite element post-processing. Adv Eng Softw 105:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADVENGSOFT.2017.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM D1002-10 (2010) Standard Test Method for Apparent Shear Strength of Single-Lap-Joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimens by Tension Loading (Metal-to-Metal), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Mech. Eng. Gürkan Kara for his collaborations in this work.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Turkish Council of Higher Education under scholar grad: ÖYP-1919-018, TUBITAK BIDEP 2211-A and Ondokuz Mayıs University Scientific Researched Project Department [grant number PYO.MUH.1905.16.002].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55200, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey

    Cengiz Görkem Dengiz

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55200, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey

    Kemal Yildizli

Authors
  1. Cengiz Görkem Dengiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kemal Yildizli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Cengiz Görkem Dengiz: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, data curation, writing-original draft, visualization, software, validation, formal analysis and Kemal Yıldızlı: writing-review & editing, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cengiz Görkem Dengiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dengiz, C.G., Yildizli, K. Experimental and simulated comparison of finite element models of bimetallic sheets for deep drawing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117, 3599–3614 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07944-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07944-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation