Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surface and interior residual stress analysis of a deep-drawn 1180-MPa class ultra-high strength steel sheet with scratch marks

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the residual stresses on the surface and in the interior of a deep-drawn cup made from a 1180-MPa class ultra-high strength steel sheet. A high residual stress causes a delayed material fracture, and an accurate evaluation of residual stress reduces failure risks. Nevertheless, the residual stress in the vicinity of the scratch marks, induced by galling in the stamping process, remains unclear. This study accordingly presented X-ray diffraction measurements of the considerable residual compressive stress associated with the scratch marks. Measurements obtained using the hole drilling method revealed a previously unknown high residual tensile stress (exceeding 1000 MPa) in the interior at the scratch mark locations, corresponding to a 0.1-mm-thick compressive zone. These measurements were then compared with the results of a finite element (FE) simulation of the deep drawing process performed without the formation of the scratch marks; the simulated residual stress in the scratch mark region considerably deviated from the measurements. A compressive stress of approximately 1000 MPa was therefore imposed on the local surface area to account for the formation of the scratch marks. The prediction of the actual residual stress on the surface and in the interior of the scratch mark region was then discussed. A simple surface stress modification technique for scratch mark prediction was realized from the comparison between the measured and FE simulation results. The stored friction work, modified by the equivalent plastic strain induced by deep drawing, could be adopted to accurately predict the location of the scratch mark region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Takagi S, Toji Y, Yoshino M, Hasegawa K (2012) Hydrogen embrittlement resistance evaluation of ultra high strength steel sheets for automobiles. ISIJ Int 52:316–322. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hojo T, Kobayashi J, Sugimoto K, Nagasaka A, Akiyama E (2020) Effects of alloying elements addition on delayed fracture properties of ultra high-strength TRIP-aided martensitic steels. Metals 10:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10010006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin J, Ma N, Lei Y, Murakawa H (2017) Measurement of residual stress in arc welded lap joints by cosα X-ray diffraction method. J Mater Process Technol 243:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun J, Klassen J, Nitschke-Pagel T, Dilger K (2018) Effects of heat source geometric parameters and arc efficiency on welding temperature field, residual stress, and distortion in thin-plate full-penetration welds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:497–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2516-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nodeh IR, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi AH (2008) Simulation of welding residual stresses in resistance spot welding, FE modeling and X-ray verification. J Mater Process Technol 205:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takagi S, Toji Y, Hasegawa K, Tanaka Y, Roessler N, Hammer B, Heller T (2010) Hydrogen embrittlement evaluation methods for ultra-high strength steel sheets for automobiles. Int J Aut Eng 1:7–13. https://doi.org/10.20485/jsaeijae.1.2_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan CJ, Ibrahim MS, Muhamad MR (2019) Preventing delayed cracks in SUS304 deep drawn cups using extreme blank holding forces aided by nanolubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:1341–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2772-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li J, Deng L, Wang X, Jin J (2017) Research on residual stresses during hot stamping with flat and local-thickened plates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:2987–2999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0386-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mori K, Abe Y, Murai Y (2020) Prevention of delayed cracking of punched 1.5 GPa ultra-high strength steel sheets by ironing with punched slug. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:2503–2510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05786-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuno T, Sekito Y, Sakurada E, Suzuki T, Kawasaki K, Suehiro M (2014) Resistance of hydrogen embrittlement on hot-sheared surface during die-quench process. ISIJ Int 54:2369–2374. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.54.2369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hojo T, Akiyama E, Saitoh H, Shiro A, Yasuda R, Shobu T, Kinugasa J, Yuse F (2020) Effects of residual stress and plastic strain on hydrogen embrittlement of a stretch-formed TRIP-aided martensitic steel sheet. Corros Sci 177:108957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuno T, Sakurada E, Seto A (2016) Fatigue strength of high-strength steel sheets after tension-compression and surface friction. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 7:660–666. (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.9773/sosei.57.660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao C, Li J, Fan W, Liu Y, Wang W (2020) Experimental and simulation research on residual stress for abrasive belt rail grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05664-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen S, Li B, Guo W (2020) Experimental study on grinding-induced residual stress in C-250 maraging steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:953–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04655-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berrahmoune MR, Berveiller S, Inal K, Patoor E (2006) Delayed cracking in 301LN austenitic steel after deep drawing: martensitic transformation and residual stress analysis. Mater Sci Eng A 438-440:262–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papula S, Saukkonen T, Talonen J, Hänninen H (2015) Delayed cracking of metastable austenitic stainless steels after deep drawing. ISIJ Int 55:2182–2188. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abe Y, Ohmi T, Mori K, Masuda T (2014) Improvement of formability in deep drawing of ultra-high strength steel sheets by coating of die. J Mater Process Technol 214:1838–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yao C, Zhang J, Cui M, Tan L, Shen X (2020) Machining deformation prediction of large fan blades based on loading uneven residual stress. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:4345–4356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05316-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Toparli MB, Fitzpatrick ME, Gungor S (2015) Determination of multiple near-surface residual stress components in laser peened aluminum alloy via the contour method. Metall Mater Trans A 46:4268–4275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-3026-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Levieil B, Bridier F, Doudard C, Thevenet D, Calloch S (2016) User influence on two complementary residual stress determination methods: contour method and incremental X-ray diffraction. Exp Mech 56:1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0189-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM E837 - 20 (2020) Standard test method for determining residual stresses by the hole-drilling strain-gage method. ASTM Int, West Conshohocken. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0837-20

  22. Shukla S (2020) Rapid in-line residual stress analysis from a portable two-dimensional X-ray diffractometer. Measurement 157:107672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maruyama Y, Miyazaki T, Sasaki T (2015) Development and validation of an X-Ray stress measurement device using an image plate suitable for the cosα method. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 64:560–566. (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.64.560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka K (2019) The cosα method for X-ray residual stress measurement using two-dimensional detector. Mech Eng Rev 6:18–00378. https://doi.org/10.1299/mer.18-00378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schajer GS (1988) Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole-drilling method. Part I—stress calculation procedures. J Eng Mater Technol 110:338–343. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3226059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hajbarati H, Zajkani A (2020) A novel finite element simulation of hot stamping process of DP780 steel based on the Chaboche thermomechanically hardening model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:2705–2718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06297-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barabash AV, Gavril’chenko EY, Gribkov EP, Markov OE (2014) Straightening of sheet with correction of waviness. Steel in translation 44:916–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsuno T, Seto A, Suehiro M, Kuriyama Y Murakami H (2012) FEM analysis of high strength steel sheets up to fracture and its application to piercing process. In: Proc. IDDRG2012 Mumbai: 134-140

  29. Kim JG, Yoon J, Baek SM, Seo MH, Cho WT, Chin KG, Chin K-G, Lee S, Kim HS (2017) Residual stress effect on the delayed fracture of twinning-induced plasticity steels. Metall Mater Trans A 48:2692–2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4056-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Luo ZC, Liu RD, Wang X, Yen HW, Huang MX (2019) The role of plastic strain on the delayed fracture behavior of twinning-induced plasticity steels. Metall Mater Trans A 50:1437–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-5087-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pelcastre L, Hardell J, Prakash B (2013) Galling mechanisms during interaction of tool steel and Al–Si coated ultra-high strength steel at elevated temperature. Tribol Int 67:263–271 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong W, Xu L, Lin Q, Wang Z (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation on galling behavior in sheet metal forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06297-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khruschov MM (1974) Principles of abrasive wear. Wear 28:69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(74)90102-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-cho-minami, Tottori City, Tottori, 680-8552, Japan

    Takashi Matsuno & Yuta Ochiai

  2. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 4630 Shimotakanezawa, Haga-machi, Haga-gun, Tochigi, 321-3393, Japan

    Yoshitaka Okitsu & Masayuki Iga

  3. IHI Inspection & Instrumentation Co., Ltd., 1 Shin-nakahara-cho, Isogo-ku, Yokohama-City, Kanagawa, 235-8501, Japan

    Ami Kohri & Takao Mikami

Authors
  1. Takashi Matsuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuta Ochiai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshitaka Okitsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masayuki Iga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ami Kohri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Takao Mikami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Takashi Matsuno: simulation, validation, formal analysis, writing–original draft. Yuta Ochiai: XRD measurement, visualization. Yoshitaka Okitsu: material, conceptualization, resources, supervision of research. Masayuki Iga: material, supervision of research. Ami Kohri: HDM measurement. Takao Mikami: HDM measurement.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Matsuno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuno, T., Ochiai, Y., Okitsu, Y. et al. Surface and interior residual stress analysis of a deep-drawn 1180-MPa class ultra-high strength steel sheet with scratch marks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116, 2873–2884 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07675-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07675-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation