Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A mini review on manufacturing defects and performance assessments of complex shape prepreg-based composites

  • Critical Review
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autoclave processing is the most common method used for curing thermoset prepregs due to its capability to minimize void content. However, unresolved problems still exist in the prepreg manufacturing process, such as the inconsistent thickness, pores, voids, and resin-rich areas of the laminate panel. Until now, laminate thickness, resin distribution, and fiber wrinkling have been the key issues that have caught the attention of many researchers. In this review paper, defect-related factors involved in the manufacturing of complex laminated composites are identified, starting with the layup process itself and ending with the curing process. The occurrence rate of defects in complex shape laminate is affected by several factors, including mold selection, material characteristics, bagging configuration, and stacking sequence. The vacuum bagging process needs further attention as it has been identified as the most critical process following its high contribution to the issues of void content and resin accumulation. Various methods for quality measurements of complex shape laminate were also described in this review, specifically for the aspects of thickness uniformity, resin distribution, and inter-laminar defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowe J (2005) Aerospace applications. In: Design and manufacture of textile composites. Elsevier, pp 405–423

  2. Loos AC, Springer GS (1983) Curing of epoxy matrix composites. J Compos Mater 17(2):135–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chawla KK (2012) Composite materials: science and engineering. Springer Science & Business Media

  4. Williams JG, Stein M (1976) Buckling behavior and structural efficiency of open-section stiffened composite compression panels. J AIAA J 14(11):1618–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams J, Mikulas J (1976) M Analytical and experimental study of structurally efficient composite hat-stiffened panels loaded in axial compression. In: 16th Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, p 754

  6. Hubert P (1996) Aspects of flow and compaction of laminated composite shapes during cure. University of British Columbia

  7. Hubert P, Poursartip A (1998) A review of flow and compaction modelling relevant to thermoset matrix laminate processing. J Reinforc Plastic Compos 17(4):286–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Naji MI, Hoa SV (2000) Curing of thick angle-bend thermoset composite part: curing process modification for uniform thickness and uniform fiber volume fraction distribution. J Compos Mater 34(20):1710–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naji MI, Hoa SV (1999) Curing of thick angle-bend thermoset composite part: curing cycle effect on thickness variation and fiber volume fraction. J Reinforc Plastic Compos 18(8):702–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li M (2001) Optimal curing of thermoset composites: thermochemical and consolidation considerations. PhD Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  11. Hubert P, Poursartip A (2001) Aspects of the compaction of composite angle laminates: an experimental investigation. Int J Numer Meth Eng 35(1):2–26

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fernlund G, Griffith J, Courdji R, Poursartip A (2002) Experimental and numerical study of the effect of caul-sheets on corner thinning of composite laminates. J Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 33(3):411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang X, Zhang Z, Xie F, Li M, Dai D, Wang FJ (2009) Correlated rules between complex structure of composite components and manufacturing defects in autoclave molding technology. J Reinf Plast Compos 28(22):2791–2803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Li M, Gu Y, Zhang Z (2009) Numerical and experimental study on the effect of lay-up type and structural elements on thickness uniformity of L-shaped laminates. J Appl Compos Mater 16(2):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li M, Tucker CLJCPAAS III (2002) Modeling and simulation of two-dimensional consolidation for thermoset matrix composites. J Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 33(6):877–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chambers A, Earl J, Squires C, Suhot M (2006) The effect of voids on the flexural fatigue performance of unidirectional carbon fibre composites developed for wind turbine applications. Int J Fatigue 28(10):1389–1398

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Bowles KJ, Frimpong S (1992) Void effects on the interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional graphite-fiber-reinforced composites. J Compos Mater 26(10):1487–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gillespie JW Jr, Pipes RB (1984) Compressive strength of composite laminates with interlaminar defects. J Compos Struct 2(1):49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hubert P, Vaziri R, Poursartip A (1999) A two-dimensional flow model for the process simulation of complex shape composite laminates. Int J Numer Meth Eng 44(1):1–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Loos AC, Freeman W (1985) Resin flow during autoclave cure of graphite-epoxy composites. In: High modulus fiber composites in ground transportation and high volume applications. ASTM International

  21. Brillant M (2010) Out-of-autoclave manufacturing of complex shape composite laminates. McGill University Library

  22. Boey F, Lye S (1992) Void reduction in autoclave processing of thermoset composites: part 1: high pressure effects on void reduction. J Compos 23(4):261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Babu B, Prabhakaran RD, Agrawal V (2008) Quality evaluation of resin transfer molded products. J Reinf Plast Compos 27(6):559–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scherer R, Friedrich K (1991) Inter-and intraply-slip flow processes during thermoforming of CF/PP-laminates. J Compos Manuf 2(2):92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pandey RK, Sun C (1999) Mechanisms of wrinkle formation during the processing of composite laminates. J Compos Sci Technol 59(3):405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Long A, Rudd C, Blagdon M, Smith P (1996) Characterizing the processing and performance of aligned reinforcements during preform manufacture. J Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 27(4):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y (2016) Damage mechanisms associated with kink-band formation in unidirectional fibre composites. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)

  28. Thor M, Sause MG, Hinterhölzl RM (2020) Mechanisms of origin and classification of out-of-plane fiber waviness in composite materials—a review. J Compos Sci 4(3):130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hallander P, Akermo M, Mattei C, Petersson M, Nyman T (2013) An experimental study of mechanisms behind wrinkle development during forming of composite laminates. J Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 50:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xie N, Smith RA, Mukhopadhyay S, Hallett SR (2018) A numerical study on the influence of composite wrinkle defect geometry on compressive strength. J Mater Design 140:7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Belnoue JP-H, Hallett SR (2020) A rapid multi-scale design tool for the prediction of wrinkle defect formation in composite components. J Mater Design 187:108388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hassan MH, Othman AR (2017) Contribution of processing parameters on void content in the vacuum bagging configurations of L-shaped composite laminates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(1):1333–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brillant M, Hubert P (2010) Out-of-autoclave processing of complex shape laminates. In: Proceedings of the SAMPE 2010 conference of the society for the advancement of materials and process engineering, pp 1–15

  34. Mujahid Y, Sallih N, Mustapha M, Abdullah MZ, Mustapha F (2020) Effects of processing parameters for vacuum-bagging-only method on shape conformation of laminated composites. J Proc 8(9):1147

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li Y, Li M, Zhang Z, Gu Y (2009) Numerical analysis of parametric effects on consolidation of angle-bended composite laminates. J Polymer Compos 30(10):1510–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kratz J (2009) Processing composite sandwich structures using out-of-autoclave technology. McGill University MSc thesis

  37. Gong X, Chen X, Zhou Y (2018) Advanced weaving technologies for high-performance fabrics. In: High-Performance Apparel. Elsevier, pp 75–112

  38. Albers A, Weber NF, Cirauqui M, Smith T (2017) On weaving: new, expanded edn. Princeton University Press

  39. Hann M (2020) Textile design: products and processes. CRC Press

  40. Gutowski TG, Cai Z, Bauer S, Boucher D, Kingery J, Wineman S (1987) Consolidation experiments for laminate composites. J Compos Mater 21(7):650–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Endruweit A, McGregor P, Long A, Johnson M (2006) Influence of the fabric architecture on the variations in experimentally determined in-plane permeability values. J Compos Sci Technol 66(11-12):1778–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharma S, Siginer DA (2010) Permeability measurement methods in porous media of fiber reinforced composites. J Appl Mechan Rev 63(2)

  43. Hassan MH, Othman AR, Kamaruddin S (2017) A review on the manufacturing defects of complex-shaped laminate in aircraft composite structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9):4081–4094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xin CB, Gu YZ, Li M, Luo J, Li Y, Zhang Z (2011) Experimental and numerical study on the effect of rubber mold configuration on the compaction of composite angle laminates during autoclave processing. J Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 42(10):1353–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang X, Xie F, Li M, Zhang Z (2010) Influence of tool assembly schemes and integral molding technologies on compaction of T-stiffened skins in autoclave process. J Reinf Plast Compos 29(9):1311–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim G-H, Choi J-H, Kweon J-H (2010) Manufacture and performance evaluation of the composite hat-stiffened panel. J Compos Struct 92(9):2276–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. He Y, Li Y, Ju K, Wen Y, Hao X, Zhou J, Liu S (2020) Elastomeric microfluidic valve for active resin flow control within composite structure. J Compos Struct 254:112844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Radford DW (1995) Volume fraction gradient induced warpage in curved composite plates. J Composites Eng 5(7):923–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lynch K, Hubert P, Poursartip A (1999) Use of a simple, inexpensive pressure sensor to measure hydrostatic resin pressure during processing of composite laminates. J Polymer Compos 20(4):581–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schechter SG, Centea T, Nutt SR (2018) Polymer film dewetting for fabrication of out-of-autoclave prepreg with high through-thickness permeability. J Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 114:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ridgard C (2009) Out of autoclave composite technology for aerospace, defense and space structures. J Proc SAMPE

  52. Louis BM (2010) Gas transport in out-of-autoclave prepreg laminates. University of British Columbia

  53. ACG (2007) MTM 45-1 matrix resin product data sheet. PDS1205/11.07/3.

  54. Mehdikhani M, Gorbatikh L, Verpoest I, Lomov SV (2019) Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater 53(12):1579–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Eom Y, Boogh L, Michaud V, Sunderland P, Månson JA (2001) Stress-initiated void formation during cure of a three-dimensionally constrained thermoset resin. J Polymer Eng Sci 41(3):492–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Michaud V, Tavares SS, Sigg A, Lavanchy S, Månson J (2006) Low pressure processing of high fiber content composites. In: 8th international conference on flow processes in composite materials (FPCM8), Douai, France.

  57. Hyun D-K, Kim D, Hwan Shin J, Lee B-E, Shin D-H, Hoon Kim J (2020) Cure cycle modification for efficient vacuum bag only prepreg process. J Compos Mater 2020:0021998320963541

    Google Scholar 

  58. Materials ASfTa (1994) Standard test method for carbon of resin-matrix composites by matrix digestion. In: D3171-76. Annual Book of ASTM standards

  59. Gu Y, Xin C, Li M, Cheng Y, Zhang Z (2012) Resin pressure and resin flow inside tapered laminates during zero-bleeding and bleeding processes. J Reinforc Plastic Compos 31(4):205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Xin C, Gu Y, Li M, Li Y, Zhang Z (2011) Online monitoring and analysis of resin pressure inside composite laminate during zero-bleeding autoclave process. J Polymer Compos 32(2):314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xin C, Li M, Gu Y, Luo J, Zhang Z (2011) Study on the resin flow and fiber compaction of tapered composite laminates during autoclave processing. J Reinforc Plastic Compos 30(16):1399–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang H, Colton JS (1994) Quantitative image processing analysis of composite materials. J Polymer Compos 15(1):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Krumenacker N, Madra A, Hubert P (2020) Image-based characterization of fibre waviness in a representative vacuum-bagged corner laminate. J Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 131:105774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Birt E, Smith R (2004) A review of NDE methods for porosity measurement in fibre-reinforced polymer composites. J Insight-Non-Destr Test Condit Monitor 46(11):681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia and Universiti Sains Malaysia for the financial support for this research work.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

There is no research grant involved in this article writing, and the author’s sponsorship is already mentioned in the acknowledgements section.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300, Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

    Muhammad Hafiz Hassan

Authors
  1. Muhammad Hafiz Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Muhammad Hafiz Hassan — Construct the main content of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Hafiz Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, M.H. A mini review on manufacturing defects and performance assessments of complex shape prepreg-based composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115, 3393–3408 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07421-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07421-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation