Skip to main content
Log in

Deformation analysis and processing parameter optimization of roller clinching

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roller clinching is a variation of conventional clinching by using rotational tool movement. The joining quality of roller clinching is significantly affected by tooling geometries and motions. Considering the formation difference of joints at different locations, this paper investigated the deformation features of roller clinching of square joints and utilized multiple linear regression analysis to optimize the processing parameters. It was found that roller geometry has significant impact on the formation of interlocks of the front/rear sides of joints, while the impact on the formation of lateral sides is less. With the increase of roller diameters, the clearance variation of front/rear sides decreases; meanwhile, the separation clearance s at the front side after forming decreases. In the study, when the roller diameter is raised from 35 to 150 mm, the connection strength increases by 44%. If the diameter difference w of rollers increases, the squeezing degree of the front side decreases, and the joining quality increases; however, if the squeezing degree of the rear side increases, then the joining quality of the rear side and s decrease. In the sample, an increase in w by 3 mm enhanced the connection strength by 9%. When the clearance difference t between the rollers increases, the capability to contain metal increases in the rear side. When t increases by 0.6 mm, the connection strength augments by 12%. The separation clearance s of the front side is greatly affected by friction μ, roller diameter, w, and draft angle γ of the lower roller, while the effect of draft angle β of the upper roller on s is small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reason-able request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

R p :

Radius of upper roller

R d :

Radius of lower roller

w :

Diameter difference of the upper and lower rollers

β :

Draft angle of the upper roller

γ :

Draft angle of the lower roller

d :

Distance between the centers of the upper and lower rollers

ω :

Angular velocity of the rollers

W p :

The thickness of the upper roller punch in the axial direction of the roller

x :

Thickness of joint bottom

H d :

Die depth in the radial direction of the lower roller

h :

The height of the punch in the radial direction of the upper roller

c :

Depth of the lower roller cavity

T u :

Interlock

T pn :

The minimum thickness of the upper sheet in the axial direction of the roller

T dn :

The minimum thickness of the lower sheet in the axial direction of the roller

ΔL f :

Front clearance between the rollers, when θ = 0

ΔL e :

Rear clearance between the rollers, when θ = 0

t :

Difference between ΔLf and ΔLe

θ :

Rotation angle of the rollers

θ 1 :

Rotation angle of the rollers, when lower plate contacts the lower roller cavity

θ A :

Intersection angle of rotation radius of point A to y-direction, when θ = 0

θ B :

Intersection angle of rotation radius of point B to y-direction, when θ = 0

L A :

Distance from point A to the front side of lower roller

L B :

Distance from point B to the front side of upper roller

R A :

Rotation radius of point A

R B :

Rotation radius of point B

μ :

Friction coefficient

s :

Separation clearance at the front side after forming

References

  1. Mori K, Bay N, Fratini L, Micari F, Tekkaya AE (2013) Joining by plastic deformation. CIRP Ann — Manuf Technol 62(2):673–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Groche P, Wohletz S, Brenneis M, Pabst C, Resch F (2014) Joining by forming — a review on joint mechanisms, applications and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 214(10):1972–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mori K, Abe Y (2018) A review on mechanical joining of aluminium and high strength steel sheets by plastic deformation. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 1:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wiesenmayer S, Merklein M (2021) Potential of shear-clinching technology for joining of three sheets. J Adv Join Process 3:100043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agrawal AK, Narayanan RG (2018) Pull-out tests on tube to sheet joints fabricated by endforming. J Constr Steel Res 144(5):186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C, Zhang HY, Xu YQ, Wu JL (2020) Investigation of the flat-clinching process for joining three-layer sheets on thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct 157:107034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nourani SA, Pons DJ, Tamadon A, Symons D (2021) Microstructural deformation in the clinching process. J Adv Join Process 3(10):100041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abe Y, Mori K, Kato T (2012) Joining of high strength steel and aluminium alloy sheets by mechanical clinching with dies for control of metal flow. J Mater Process Technol 212(4):884–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe Y, Kato T, Mori K, Nishino S (2014) Mechanical clinching of ultra-high strength steel sheets and strength of joints. J Mater Process Technol 214(10):2112–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neugebauer R, Mauermann R, Dietrich S, Kraus C (2007) A new technology for the joining by forming of magnesium alloys. Prod Eng 1(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerstmann T, Awiszus B (2020) Hybrid joining: numerical process development of flat-clinch-bonding. J Mater Process Technol 277:116421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wen T, Wang H, Yang C, Liu L (2014) On a reshaping method of clinched joints to reduce the protrusion height. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(9–12):1709–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wen T, Huang Q, Liu Q, Ou WX, Zhang S (2016) Joining different metallic sheets without protrusion by flat hole clinching process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee CJ, Lee JM, Ryu HY, Lee KH, Kim BM, Ko DC (2014) Design of hole-clinching process for joining of dissimilar materials – Al6063-T4 alloy with DP780 steel, hot-pressed 22MnB5 steel, and carbon fiber reinforced plastic. J Mater Process Technol 214(10):2169–2178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lambiase F (2013) Influence of process parameters in mechanical clinching with extensible dies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):2123–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang T, Liu ZX,·Wang PC (2014) Quality inspection of clinched joints of steel and aluminum. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):1393–1402

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coppieters S, Lava P, Baes S, Sol H, Van Houtte PV, Debruyne D (2012) Analytical method to predict the pull-out strength of clinched connections. Thin-Walled Struct 52:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oudjene M, Ben-Ayed L, Delameziere A, Batoz JL (2009) Shape optimization of clinching tools using the response surface methodology with moving least-square approximation. J Mater Process Technol 209(1):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rill D, Weiß M, Hoffmann H, Volk W (2014) Simulation assisted analysis of material flow in roller clinched joints. Adv Mater Res 966-967:628–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiller M, Volk W (2015) Joining aluminium alloy and mild steel sheets by roller clinching. Appl Mech Mater 794:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hiller M, Benkert T, Vitzthum S, Volk W (2017) Influence of tool elasticity on process forces and joint properties during clinching with rotational tool movement. J Phys Conf Ser 896:012116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant No. cstc2018jcyjAX0159 and cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0420).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Youcheng Pan: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing. Tong Wen: project administration, supervision, reviewing, editing. Yin Zhou: simulation, investigation. Jianhao You, Haoxing Tang and Xia Chen: experiment data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tong Wen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The research does not involve human participants or animals and the authors warrant that the paper fulfills the ethical standards of the journal.

Consent to participate

It is confirmed that all the authors are aware and satisfied of the authorship order and correspondence of the paper.

Consent to publish

All the authors are satisfied that the last revised version of the paper is published without any change.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Y., Wen, T., Zhou, Y. et al. Deformation analysis and processing parameter optimization of roller clinching. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116, 1621–1631 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07215-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07215-y

Keywords

Navigation