Skip to main content

Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology volume 114, pages 1517–1531 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Availability of data and material

Not applicable

Code availability

Not applicable

References

  1. ASTM International (2012) Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies F2792-12a. West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang X, Chou K (2017) Effects of thermal cycles on the microstructure evolution of Inconel 718 during selective laser melting process. Addit Manuf 18:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu X, Ding J, Ganguly S, Williams S (2019) Investigation of process factors affecting mechanical properties of INCONEL 718 superalloy in wire+ arc additive manufacture process. J Mater Process Technol 265:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackwell PL (2005) The mechanical and microstructural characteristics of laser-deposited IN718. J Mater Process Technol 170:240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark D, Bache MR, Whittaker MT (2008) Shaped metal deposition of a nickel alloy for aero engine applications. J Mater Process Technol 203:439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanz C, García Navas V (2013) Structural integrity of direct metal laser sintered parts subjected to thermal and finishing treatments. J Mater Process Technol 213:2126–2136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang W, Lin X (2014) Research progress in laser solid forming of high-performance metallic components at the state key laboratory of solidification processing of China. 3D Print Addit Manuf 1:156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tucho WM, Cuvillier P, Sjolyst-Kverneland A, Hansen V (2017) Microstructure and hardness studies of Inconel 718 manufactured by selective laser melting before and after solution heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 689:220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sui S, Tan H, Chen J, Zhong C, Li Z, Fan W, Gasser A, Huang W (2019) The influence of Laves phases on the room temperature tensile properties of Inconel 718 fabricated by powder feeding laser additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 164:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elmer JW, Gibbs G (2019) The effect of atmosphere on the composition of wire arc additive manufactured metal components. Sci Technol Weld Join 24:367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benn RC, Salva RP (2010) Additively manufactured INCONEL® alloy 718. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 and Derivatives. TMS, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp 455–456.

  12. Gradl PR, Msfc N (2019) Additive manufacturing development and hot-fire testing of liquid rocket channel wall nozzles using blown powder directed energy deposition Inconel 625 and JBK-75 alloys. 55th AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum. Indianapolis, IN.

  13. Asala G, Khan A, Andersson J, Ojo O (2017) Microstructural analyses of ATI 718Plus produced by wire-ARC additive manufacturing process. Metall Mater Trans A 48:4211–4228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu X, Ganguly S, Ding J, Seow C, Williams S (2018) Enhancing mechanical properties of wire + arc additively manufactured INCONEL 718 superalloy through in-process thermomechanical processing. Mater Des 160:1042–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knapp GL, Mukherjee T, Zuback JS, Wei HL, Palmer TA, De A, DebRoy T (2017) Building blocks for a digital twin of additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 135:390–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu F, Lin X, Huang C, Song M, Yang G, Chen J, Huang W (2011) The effect of laser scanning path on microstructures and mechanical properties of laser solid formed nickel-base superalloy Inconel 718. J Alloys Compd 509:4505–4509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tian Y, McAllister D, Colijn H, Mills M, Farson D, Nordin M, Babu S (2014) Rationalization of microstructure heterogeneity in INCONEL 718 builds made by the direct laser additive manufacturing process. Metall Mater Trans A 45:4470–4483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hou S, Muzangaza E, Bombardiere M, Okioga A, Bracket D (2017) Optimising the dynamic process parameters in electron beam melting (EBM) to achieve internal defect quality control. Proc. Int. Euro Powder Metall. Congr. Exhib. Euro PM 2017.

  19. Liberini M, Astarita A, Campatelli G, Scippa A, Montevecchi F (2017) Selection of optimal process parameters for wire arc additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 62:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tapia G, Elwany A (2014) A review on process monitoring and control in metal-based additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:060801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang X, Wang A, Wang K, Li Y (2019) Process stability for GTAW-based additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 25:809–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tammas-Williams S, Zhao H, Léonard F, Derguti F, Todd I, Prangnell PB (2015) XCT analysis of the influence of melt strategies on defect population in Ti–6Al–4V components manufactured by selective electron beam melting. Mater Charact 102:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dinovitzer M, Chen X, Laliberte J, Huang X, Frei H (2019) Effect of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process parameters on bead geometry and microstructure. Addit Manuf 26:138–146

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garg A, Lam JSL, Savalani MM (2015) A new computational intelligence approach in formulation of functional relationship of open porosity of the additive manufacturing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raghavan N, Dehoff R, Pannala S, Simunovic S, Kirka M (2016) Numerical modeling of heat-transfer and the influence of process parameters on tailoring the grain morphology of IN718 in electron beam additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 112:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas M, Baxter GJ, Todd I (2016) Normalised model-based processing diagrams for additive layer manufacture of engineering alloys. Acta Mater 108:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dye D, Hunziker O, Reed RC (2001) Numerical analysis of the weldability of superalloys. Acta Mater 49:683–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pépe N, Egerland S, Colegrove PA, Yapp D, Leonhartsberger A, Scotti A (2011) Measuring the process efficiency of controlled gas metal arc welding processes. Sci Technol Weld Join 16:412–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoefer K, Haelsig A, Mayr P (2018) Arc-based additive manufacturing of steel components—comparison of wire- and powder-based variants. Weld World 62:243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pantsar H, Kujanpää V (2004) Diode laser beam absorption in laser transformation hardening of low alloy steel. J Laser Appl 16:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Santhanakrishnan S, Kong F, Kovacevic R (2013) An experimentally based thermo-kinetic phase transformation model for multi-pass laser heat treatment by using high power direct diode laser. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu X, Zhou Y, Xing X, Shao L, Yang Q, Gao S et al (2017) Open-source wire and arc additive manufacturing system: formability, microstructures, and mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:2145–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kong F, Ma J, Kovacevic R (2011) Numerical and experimental study of thermally induced residual stress in the hybrid laser–GMA welding process. J Mater Process Technol 211:1102–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020M673587XB and No. 2020TQ0133), Yunnan Postdoctoral Research Foundation Project, Kunming University of Science and Technology Postdoctoral Academic Activities Foundation (No. 1323/109820190026), and Kunming University of Science and Technology Startup Research Grant for Distinguished Scholar (No. KKKP201751008).

Funding

The research was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Yunnan Postdoctoral Research Found Project, Kunming University of Science and Technology Postdoctoral Academic Activities Foundation, and Kunming University of Science and Technology Startup Research Grant for Distinguished Scholar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, People’s Republic of China

    Xin Lu, Mengnie Victor Li & Hongbin Yang

Authors
  1. Xin Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengnie Victor Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongbin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Lu or Mengnie Victor Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, X., Li, M.V. & Yang, H. Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114, 1517–1531 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y

Keywords

  • Cladding
  • Additive manufacturing
  • Process parameters
  • Energy density
  • IN718 superalloy