Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of scaleboard on the dispersion deformation behavior of DP600 steel sheets during electrohydraulic forming

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The action mechanism of scaleboard on the dispersion deformation behavior of DP600 steel sheets during electrohydraulic forming (EHF) was explored by means of experiments and numerical simulation. The results showed that a maximum major strain of 60% was achieved during the pure EHF process, which was improved by 70% compared with that during the quasi-static condition, but the scaleboard played a negative role and decreased the hyperplasticity effect of EHF by 20%. Under the action of the energy absorption of the scaleboard and its interaction with the tested specimen, the utilization rate of critical discharge energy for crack bifurcation and dispersion deformation was decreased by 55.3% and 26.8%, respectively. Under the instantaneous impact of scaleboard, an additional tensile stress was generated on the central element of the tested specimen, which destroyed the effect of inertial coordination deformation on the elements near failure and decreased the proportion of inertial dispersion deformation by 48.6%. Due to the mechanical impact action of scaleboard in the biaxial tensile stress state and the accompanying bidirectional friction effect, the failed elements changed from the uniaxial tensile stress state to the biaxial tensile stress state gradually, while the central element underwent a fluctuating transition of uniaxial-biaxial-uniaxial tensile stress state. Besides, the curling effect of scaleboard induced the edge elements along the width direction of the tested specimens to change from the uniaxial tensile stress state to the biaxial tensile stress state, which aggravated the uneven deformation along the width direction obviously. In summary, the pure EHF with profiled blank holder is more suitable for industrial application and production than that with scaleboard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Su HL, Huang L, Li JJ, Ma F, Ma HJ, Huang P, Zhu H, Feng F (2020) Inhomogeneous deformation behaviors of oblique hole-flanging parts during electromagnetic forming. J Manuf Process 52:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Psyk V, Risch D, Kinsey BL, Tekkaya AE, Kleiner M (2011) Electromagnetic forming-a review. J Mater Process Technol 211:787–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Golovashchenko SF (2007) Material formability and coil design in electromagnetic forming. J Mater Eng Perform 16:314–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang QX, Huang L, Li JJ, Feng F, Su HL, Ma F, Zhong K (2019) Investigation of dynamic deformation behavior of large-size sheet metal parts under local Lorentz force. J Mater Process Technol 265:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Odeshi AG, Ameeri S, Bassim MN (2005) Effect of high strain rate on plastic deformation of a low alloy steel subjected to ballistic impact. J Mater Process Technol 162:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Golovashchenko SF, Gillard AJ, Mamutov AV, Ibrahim R (2014) Pulsed electrohydraulic springback calibration of parts stamped from advanced high strength steel. J Mater Process Technol 214:2796–2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Golovashchenko SF, Gillard AJ, Mamutov AV (2013) Formability of dual phase steels in electrohydraulic forming. J Manuf Process 213:1191–1212

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maris C, Hassannejadasl A, Green DE, Cheng J, Golovashchenko SF, Gillard AJ, Liang YT (2016) Comparison of quasi-static and electrohydraulic free forming limits for DP600 and AA5182 sheets. J Mater Process Technol 235:206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng J, Green DE, Golovashchenko SF (2017) Formability enhancement of DP600 steel sheets in electro-hydraulic die forming. J Mater Process Technol 244:178–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li FQ, Mo JH, Li JJ, Huang L, Zhou HY (2013) Formability of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy sheet in magnetic pulse bulging. Mater Des 52:337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park H, Kim D, Lee J, Kim SJ, Lee Y (2016) Effect of an aluminum driver sheet on the electromagnetic forming of DP780 steel sheet. J Mater Process Technol 235:158–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu JR, Cao D, Chen G, Chen WZ, Zhu DB, Liu Y (2018) Experimental and numerical research on magnetic pulse forming of DP600 high-strength steel with driver sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu HP, Zheng QL (2019) Forming limit diagram of DP600 steel sheets during electrohydraulic forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:743–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li FQ, Mo JH, Zhou HY, Fang Y (2013) 3D Numerical simulation method of electromagnetic forming for low conductive metals with a driver. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:1575–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Woo MA, Song WJ, Kang BS, Kim J (2019) Evaluation of formability enhancement of aluminum alloy sheet in electrohydraulic forming process with free-bulge die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:1085–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mamutov AV, Golovashchenko SF, Mamutov VS, Bonnen JJF (2015) Modeling of electrohydraulic forming of sheet metal parts. J Mater Process Technol 219:84–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China with grant no. 51675128 and grant no. 51475122.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Qiuli Zheng and Haiping Yu conceived and designed the study. Qiuli Zheng performed the experiments and provided figures and tables. Haiping Yu and Qiuli Zheng analyzed the data and edited the manuscript. Haiping Yu reviewed and improved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiping Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study complies with the ethical standards set out by Springer.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Q., Yu, H. Influence of scaleboard on the dispersion deformation behavior of DP600 steel sheets during electrohydraulic forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114, 757–769 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06904-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06904-y

Keywords

Navigation