Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation on the forming limit diagram of AA5754-O alloy by considering strain hardening model, strain path, and through-thickness normal stress

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study clarified the effects of the chosen hardening model, through-thickness normal stress, and non-linear strain path on the precision of forming limit diagram (FLD). The Marciniak-Kuczynski (M-K) instability theory was employed to calculate the FLD of AA5754-O based on the different hardening models. Swift, Voce, modified Voce, Kim-Tuan, and modified Kim-Tuan hardening models were adopted to predict the forming limits, and their constant parameters were presented. Predicted FLDs indicate that modified Kim-Tuan has a better agreement with experimental data than other models. After that the influences of through-thickness normal stress on the forming limit diagram were examined. The three-dimensional stress state was converted to plane-stress condition according to the assumption that hydrostatic stress is ineffective on the plastic deformation. The results show that formability improves when normal stress increases. However, the effect of the normal stress on FLD for various hardening models is different. Due to the complexity of sheet metal forming, the strain path of the material may change during the deformation process. The results indicated that strain path has a significant effect on the FLD, and the path dependence of the forming limit stress diagram (FLSD) will be examined in detail. Finally, the forming limits were computed to analyze the effect of the normal stress on the non-linear loading path deformation. It was observed that by increasing the amount of pre-strain, the effect of the normal stress on the formability will diminish. Moreover, results showed that normal stress will affect the path dependence of the FLSD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

References

  1. Keeler SP, Backhofen WA (1963) Plastic instability and fracture in sheet stretched over rigid punches. ASM Trans Quart 56:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming in the press shop. SAE Trans:380–387

  3. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K (1967) Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 9:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang H, Wan M, Yan Y (2012) Effect of flow stress−strain relation on forming limit of 5754O aluminum alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:2370–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang H, Liu Y, Chen Z, Wan M, Nie H (2016) Investigation of the capabilities of yield functions on describing the deformation behavior of 5754O aluminum alloy sheet under combined loading paths. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Sci.) 21(5):562–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pham QT, Lee BH, Park KC, Kim YS (2018) Influence of the post necking prediction of hardening law on the theoretical forming limit curve of aluminum sheets. Int J Mech Sci 140:521–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pham QT, Lee MG, Kim YS (2019) Characterization of the isotropic-distortional hardening model and its application to commercially pure titanium sheets. Int J Mech Sci 160:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graf AF, Hosford WF (1994) The influence of strain path changes on forming limit diagram. Int J Mech Sci 36:897–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Narihara K, Takahashi S (2005) Experimental verification of the path dependence of forming limit stresses. Int J Form Process 8:283–298

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Kuroda M (2007) Path-dependence of the forming limit stresses in a sheet metal. Int J Plast 23:361–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhalehfar F, Hashemi R, Hosseinipour SJ (2015) Experimental and theoretical investigation of strain path change effect on forming limit diagram of AA5083. Int J Adv Man Technol 76(5−8):1343–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhara S, Basak S, Panda SK, Hazra S, Shollock B, Dashwood R (2016) Formability analysis of pre-strained AA5754-O sheet metal using Yld96 plasticity theory: role of amount and direction of uni-axial pre-strain. J Manuf Process 24:270–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Yan Y, Han F, Wan M (2017) Experimental and theoretical investigations of the forming limit of 5754O aluminum alloy sheet under different combined loading paths. Int J Mech Sci 133:147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paul SK (2015) Path independent limiting criteria in sheet metal forming. J Manuf Process 20(1):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan WN, Wan M, Wu XD, Cheng C, Cai ZY, Ma BL (2018) A numerical MK approach for predicting the forming limits of material AA5754-O. Int J Adv Man Technol 98(1−4):811–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma BL, Wan M, Cai ZY, Li C, Wu XD, Liu W (2018) Investigation on the forming limits of 5754-O aluminum alloy sheet with the M-K approach. Int J Mech Sci 143:420–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan W, Wan M, Wu X, Ma BL, Lu X, Yang B (2020) Influence of uniaxial tensile pre-strain on forming limit curve by using biaxial tensile test. Chin J Aeronaut 33(8):2268–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Banabic D, Soare S (2008) On the effect of the normal pressure upon the forming limit strains. Proceedings Numisheet Conference: 199−204

  19. Assempour A, Nejadkhaki HK, Hashemi R (2010) Forming limit diagrams with the existence of through-thickness normal stress. Comput Mater Sci 48:504–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2011) Effects of sheet mechanical properties on forming limits in presence of a through-thickness stress. AIP Conference Proceeding 1353:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang F, Chen J, Chen J, Zhu X (2014) Forming limit model evaluation for anisotropic sheet metals under through-thickness normal stress. Int J Mech Sci 89:40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirfalah Nasiri SM, Basti A, Hashemi R (2016) Forming limit curves analysis of aluminum alloy considering the through-thickness normal stress anisotropic yield functions and strain rate. Int J Mech Sci 117:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirfalah Nasiri SM, Basti A, Hashemi R, Darvizeh A (2018) Effects of normal and through-thickness shear stresses on the forming limit curves of AA3104-H19 using advanced yield criteria. Int J Mech Sci 137:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Erfanian M, Hashemi R (2018) A comparative study of the extended forming limit diagrams considering strain path, through-thickness normal and shear stress. Int J Mech Sci 148:316–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma BL, Wan M, Zhang H, Gong XL, Wu XD (2018) Evaluation of the forming limit curve of medium steel plate based on non-constant through-thickness normal stress. J Manuf Process 33:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu Q, Zhang L, Ouyang Q, Li X, Zhu X, Chen J (2018) Prediction of forming limits for anisotropic materials with nonlinear strain paths by an instability approach. Int J Plast 103:143–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu Q, Li X, Chen J (2019) Forming limit evaluation by considering through-thickness normal stress: theory and modeling. Int J Mech Sci 155:187–196

  28. Da Rocha AB, Barlat F, Jalinier JM (1985) Prediction of the forming limit diagrams of anisotropic sheets in linear and non-linear loading. Mater Sci Eng 68:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang F, Chen J, Chen J (2014) Effect of through-thickness normal stress on forming limits under Yld2003 yield criterion and MK model. Int J Mech Sci 89:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim YS, Lee BH, Yang SH (2018) Prediction of forming limit curve for pure titanium sheet. Trans. Nonferrous Met Soc China 28:319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barlat F, Brema JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi SH, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Plast 19:1297–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Soheila sojodi wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data. Ali Basti supervised the research. Seyed Reza Falahatgar supervised the research and contributed to the final version of manuscript. Seyedeh Maryam Mirfalah Nasiri proposed the idea and contributed to the performance the analysis of data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Basti.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Compliance with ethical standard

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent to publish

Not applicable

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sojodi, S., Basti, A., Falahatgar, S.R. et al. Investigation on the forming limit diagram of AA5754-O alloy by considering strain hardening model, strain path, and through-thickness normal stress. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113, 2495–2511 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06801-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06801-4

Keywords

Navigation