Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting the material removal rate during electrical discharge diamond grinding using the Gaussian process regression: a comparison with the artificial neural network and response surface methodology

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machine learning approaches can help facilitate the optimization of machining processes. Model performance, including accuracy, stability, and robustness, are major criteria to choose among different methods. Besides, the applicability, ease of implementations, and cost-effectiveness should be considered for industrial applications. In the current study, we present the Gaussian process regression model to predict the material removal rate during electrical discharge diamond surface grinding of Inconel-718. The model uses descriptors that include the wheel speed, current, pulse-on-time, and duty factor. The model is simple and manifests high accuracy and stability, which contributes to fast material removal rate estimations. By combining the optimization results from the Taguchi method and GPR approach, it is expected that more quantitative data can be extracted from fewer experimental trials at the same time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwartz J, Koch CC, Zhang Y, Liu X Formation of bismuth strontium calcium copper oxide superconductors. U.S Patent US9773962B2, September 26, 2017

  2. Zhang Y, Johnson S, Naderi G, Chaubal M, Hunt A, Schwartz J (2016) High critical current density Bi2Sr2CaCu2O x/Ag wire containing oxide precursor synthesized from nano-oxides. Supercond Sci Technol 29(9):095012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Y, Koch CC, Schwartz J (2016) Formation of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O x/Ag multifilamentary metallic precursor powder-in-tube wires. Supercond Sci Technol 29(12):125005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, Koch CC, Schwartz J (2014) Synthesis of Bi2Sr2CaCu2Ox superconductors via direct oxidation of metallic precursors. Supercond Sci Technol 27(5):055016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tso PL (1995) Study on the grinding of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 55(3–4):421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choudhury SK, Jain VK, Gupta M (1999) Electrical discharge diamond grinding of high speed steel. Mach Sci Technol 3(1):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dandekar CR, Shin YC (2012) Modeling of machining of composite materials: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:102–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siddiquee AN, Khan ZA, Goel P, Kumar M, Agarwal G, Khan NZ (2014) Optimization of deep drilling process parameters of AISI 321 steel using Taguchi method. Procedia Mater Sci 6:1217– 1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mali HS, Unune DR, Tiwari S (2014) Modelling and prediction of material removal rate in electrical discharge diamond surface grinding process of Inconel-718. In: Proceedings of 5th AIMTDR, pp 822

  10. Zhang Y, Xu X (2020) Curie temperature modeling of magnetocaloric lanthanum manganites using Gaussian process regression. J Magn Magn Mater 512:166998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Y, Xu X (2020) Machine learning lattice constants for cubic perovskite \(a_{2}^{2+}{{BB}}^{\prime }o_{6}\) compounds. CrystEngComm 22:6385–6397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jong WR, Huang YM, Lin YZ, Chen SC, Chen YW (2020) Integrating Taguchi method and artificial neural network to explore machine learning of computer aided engineering. J Chin Inst Eng 43(4):346–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Voß S (2000) Meta-heuristics: The state of the art. In: Workshop on local search for planning and scheduling. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–23

  14. Lela B, Bajić D, Jozić S (2009) Regression analysis, support vector machines, and Bayesian neural network approaches to modeling surface roughness in face milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(11–12):1082–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zuperl U, Cus F (2004) Tool cutting force modeling in ball-end milling using multilevel perceptron. J Mater Process Technol 153:268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aykut Ş , Gölcü M, Semiz S, Ergür HS (2007) Modeling of cutting forces as function of cutting parameters for face milling of satellite 6 using an artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol 190(1–3):199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akıncıoğlu S, Mendi F, Çiçek A, Akıncıoğlu G (2013) ANN-Based prediction of surface and hole quality in drilling of AISI D2 cold work tool steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1–4):197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akıncıoğlu S, Mendi F, Çiçek A, Akıncıoğlu G (2013) Prediction of thrust forces and hole diameters using artificial neural networks in drilling of AISI D2 tool steel with cemented carbide tools. Akademik Platform Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 1(2):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bull AD (2011) Convergence rates of efficient global optimization algorithms. J Mach Learn Res 12(Oct):2879–2904

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Diebold FX, Mariano RS (1995) Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harvey D, Leybourne S, Newbold P (1997) Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. Int J Forecast 13(2):281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Y, Xu X (2021) Machine Learning Glass Transition Temperature of Polyacrylamides using Quantum Chemical Descriptors. Polymer Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0py01581d

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

The article has been written by the stated authors who are all aware of its content and approve its submission.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Author contribution

Yun Zhang: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing

Xiaojie Xu: formal analysis, visualization, software, methodology, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing

Availability of data and materials

Data used in this work have been properly cited within the article.

Consent for publication

All listed authors approve to publish.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Xu, X. Predicting the material removal rate during electrical discharge diamond grinding using the Gaussian process regression: a comparison with the artificial neural network and response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113, 1527–1533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06701-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06701-7

Keywords

Navigation