Skip to main content

Product and design feature-based similar process retrieval and modeling for mold manufacturing

Abstract

The design, machining, and assembly processes used to manufacture molds are knowledge-intensive, costly, and time-consuming operations requiring considerable human resources. Mold manufacturing is a typical make-to-order system. The characteristics of new products (molds or products produced using molds) determine the process and resource plan for mold manufacturing. Therefore, it is essential to store and inherit knowledge regarding products or mold design and process planning. In this study, we extract product features from images of products. We measure the similarity between features of new products and those of products previously manufactured. The clustering method is used to search for similar processes and resources among previously manufactured products. Moreover, design characteristics such as mold type, structure, and size, obtained from design data, are used to support this search for similar processes and resources. Herein, we propose a framework for a similarity retrieval model based on results of the product and design feature extraction. Convolutional neural networks and an agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm are used to derive similar processes. Furthermore, we propose a semiautomatic procedure to construct a collaborative process model that includes product, process, and resource information. This collaborative process modeling supports the visualization and analyses of complex processes for new products. Through this study, we endeavor to construct a collaborative process model by formulating it as an optimization problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. 1.

    Pfrommer J, Schleipen M, Beyerer J (2003) PPRS: production skills and their relation to product, process, and resource. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (IEEE conference)1-4

  2. 2.

    Georgakopoulos D, Hornick M, Sheth A (1995) An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distrib Parallel Dat 3:119–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Joshi S, Chang TC (1990) Feature extraction and feature based design approaches in the development of design interface for process planning. J Intell Manuf 1(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lu B, Chen J, Ou H, Cao J (2013) Feature-based tool path generation approach for incremental sheet forming process. J Mater Process Technol 213:1221–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roy U, Liu CR (1988) Feature-based representational scheme of a solid modeler for providing dimensioning and tolerancing information. Robot CIM-Int Manuf 4(3–4):335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Joshi S, Chang TC (1988) Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model. Comput Aided Des 20(2):58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Krause F (1990) A hybrid feature based modeling system. Adv Geomet Model Eng App 189–201

  8. 8.

    Salomons OW, van Houten FJ, Kals HJ (1993) Review of research in feature-based design. J Manufac Sys 12(2):113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dong JJ, Parsaei HR, Gornet T (1993) Manufacturing features extraction and recognition in automated process planning. Comput Ind Eng 25:325–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nasr ESA, Kamrani AK (2006) A new methodology for extracting manufacturing features from CAD system. Comput Ind Eng 51:389–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yifei T, Dongbo L, Changbo L, Minjian Y (2008) A feature-extraction-based process-planning system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:1192–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li Z, Zhou X, Liu W, Niu Q, Kong C (2016) A similarity-based reuse system for injection mold design in automotive interior industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:1783–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Anderson D, Chang T (1990) Geometric reasoning in feature-based design and process planning. Comput Graph-UK 14:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jong W, Lai P, Chen Y, Ting Y (2015) Automatic process planning of mold components with integration of feature recognition and group technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:807–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sheng P, Srinivasan M, Kobayashi S (1995) Multi-objective process planning in environmentally conscious manufacturing: a feature-based approach. CIRP annals-Manuf Techn 44:433–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xu L, de Vrieze P, Phalp K, Jeary S, Liang P (2013) Interoperative end-user process modelling for process collaborative manufacturing. Int J Comput Integ M 26:990–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ryu K, Yücesan E (2007) CPM: a collaborative process modeling for cooperative manufacturers. Adv Eng Inform 21:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hack M (1976) Petri net language

  19. 19.

    Ryu K, Lee S, Kim D, Son YJ (2012) A novel modeling methodology for collaborative enterprise processes. Int J Innov Comput I 8(7):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee H, Ryu K, Cho Y (2019) PMPM: part-flow based manufacturing process modeling. Kor J Comput Des Eng 24:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schmidt DC (2006) Model-driven engineering. IEEE Comput Soc 39(2):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schleipen M, Drath R (2009) Three-view-concept for modeling process or manufacturing plants with AutomationML. IEEE Conf Emerg Techn Fact Autom1-4

  23. 23.

    Agyapong-Kodua K, Haraszkó C, Németh I (2014) Recipe-based integrated semantic product, process, resource (PPR) digital modelling methodology. Procedia CIRP 112-117

  24. 24.

    Ferrer BR, Ahmad B, Lobov A, Vera DA, Lastra JLM, Harrison R (2015) An approach for knowledge-driven product, process and resource mappings for assembly automation. IEEE-I Conf Autom Sci Eng (CASE):1104–1109

  25. 25.

    Kim C, Lee J, Kim K, Lee J, Ryu K, A (2013) Collaborative design framework for the Korean automotive parts industry. Int J Comput Integ M 26:3–18

  26. 26.

    Han J, Lee SH, Nyamsuren P (2015) An integrated engineering change management process model for a project-based manufacturing. Int J Comput Integ M 28:745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Breton E, Bézivin J (2001) Towards an understanding of model executability. Proc I Conf Form Ontol Infor Sys-V:70–80

  28. 28.

    Xie S, Girshick R, Dollár P, Tu Z, He K (2017) Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 1492-1500

  29. 29.

    Day WH, Edelsbrunner H (1984) Efficient algorithms for agglomerative hierarchical clustering methods. J Classif1:7–24

  30. 30.

    Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT press

  31. 31.

    Kalchbrenner N, Grefenstette E, Blunsom P (2014) A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.2188;

  32. 32.

    Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Adv Neural Inf Proces Sys:1097–1105

  33. 33.

    Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D et al (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit:1–9

  34. 34.

    Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J (2015) Faster r-cnn: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Adv neural Inf Proces Sys:91–99

  35. 35.

    Estévez PA, Tesmer M, Perez CA, Zurada JM (2009) Normalized mutual information feature selection. IEEE T neural networ 20(2):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Murtagh F, Legendre P (2014) Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? J Classif 31(3):274–295

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported partially by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2016R1A2B4014898) and by the IoT·big data-based value chain innovation support project for mold production of the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea (No. P0001955).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwangyeol Ryu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Ryu, K. Product and design feature-based similar process retrieval and modeling for mold manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115, 703–714 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06161-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Convolutional neural network
  • Agglomerative hierarchical clustering
  • Collaborative process modeling
  • Mold manufacturing