Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new method of design for additive manufacturing including machining constraints

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing is a major field of study and innovation. In almost every industry, a lot of effort goes into modelizing and optimizing designs in order to minimize global mass. In this context, despite all efforts, metal additive manufacturing, especially SLM, still produces parts generally considered as raw parts with some surfaces still needing to be machined in order to obtain the required geometrical quality. Despite sometimes, great complexity and cost, the machining stage is never taken into account in the design process, especially during the topological optimization approach. This paper proposes a new design for the additive manufacturing method in order to optimize the design stage and takes into account topological optimization machining as well as geometrical and mechanical constraints. The machining constraints are initially integrated as forces and functional surfaces, but also as the result of a topological optimization loop, in order to find the best possible mounting solution for machining. It is shown on a typical aeronautic part that machining forces may be indeed the greatest forces during the part’s lifetime. Using two different topological optimization software, i.e. Inspire and Abaqus Tosca, the paper illustrates that it is possible to take into account most of the machining constraints to only slightly modify the initial design and thus simplify the machining stage and reduce cost and possible failure during machining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kruth J-P (1991) Material increase manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann 40:603–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levy GN, Schindel R, Kruth JP (2003) Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies: state of the art and future perspectives. CIRP Ann-Manuf Techn 52:589–609

  3. Kruth JP, Mercelis P, van Vaerenbergh J, Froyen L, Rombouts M (2005) Binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 11 1:26–36

  4. Pessard E, Mognol P, Hascoët JY, Gerometta C (2008) Complex cast parts with rapid tooling: rapid manufacturing point of view. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:898–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kranz J, Herzog D, Emmelmann C (2015) Design guidelines for laser additive manufacturing of lightweight structures in TiAl6V4. J Laser Appl 27:S14001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Horn TJ, Harryson OLA (2012) Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog 95(3):255–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo N, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8:215–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, Part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89:309–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 22:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boothroyd G, Alting G (1992) Design for assembly and disassembly. CIRP Ann 41:625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kerbrat O, Mognol P, Hascoët JY (2011) A new DFM approach to combine machining and additive manufacturing. Comput Ind 62:684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen DW (2007) Design for additive manufacturing: a method to explore unexplored regions of the design space, 18th Annual SFF symposium

  14. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Design for additive manufacturing. in: additive manufacturing technologies. Springer US, pp 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9_11

  15. Kumke M, Watschke H, Vietor T (2016) A new methodological framework for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 11:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ponche R, Hascoet JY, Kerbrat O, Mognol P (2012) A new global approach to design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototype 7:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Designing for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 3:632–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reiher T, Lindemann C, Jahnke U, Deppe G, Koch R (2017) Holistic approach for industrializing AM technology: from part selection to test and verification. Progress Additive Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-017-0018-y

  19. Benoist V, Arnaud L, Baili M, Faye J-P (2018) opological optimization design for additive manufacturing taking into account flexion and vibrations during machining post processing. HSM 2018

  20. Mertens A, Reginster S, Paydas H, Contrepois Q, Dormal T, Lemaire O, Lecomte-Beckers J (2014) Mechanical properties of alloy Ti-6Al-4v and of stainless steel 316 L processed by selective laser melting: influence of out equilibrium microstructures. Powder Metall 57:184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reiher T, Koch R (2016) Product optimization with and for additive manufacturing, 27th annual international solid free from fabrication symposium

  22. Benoist V, Arnaud L,Baili M, Faye JP (2018) Improved design methodology for additive manufacturing including machining load 619 cases: application to an aeronautical workpiece. MUGV2018

  23. Benoist V, Baili M, Arnaud L (2019) Design for additive manufacturing including machining constraints: a case study of topology optimization including machining forces. IMMAT2019 (hal-02359933)

  24. Gilani M, Körpe DS (2019) Airline weight reduction to minimize direct operating cost, 4th International Aviation Management Conference

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the technical service of Cousso and Mr Jean-Pierre Garreau for their technical and financial assistance and also thanks to Mr J-P Faye for his help using Abaqus. Finally, the authors want to thanks “la région Occitanie” for their financial support on CEF3D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Benoist.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benoist, V., Arnaud, L. & Baili, M. A new method of design for additive manufacturing including machining constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111, 25–36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06059-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06059-2

Keywords

Navigation