Skip to main content
Log in

Tool wear state recognition based on gradient boosting decision tree and hybrid classification RBM

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machined surface quality and dimensional accuracy are significantly affected by tool wear in machining process. Tool wear state (TWS) recognition is highly desirable to realize automated machining process. In order to improve the accuracy of TWS recognition, this research develops a TWS recognition scheme using an indirect measurement method which selects signal features that are strongly correlated with tool wear to recognize TWS. Firstly, three time domain features are proposed, including dynamic time warping feature and two entropy features. The time, frequency, and time-frequency domain features of the vibration and force signals are extracted to form a feature set. Secondly, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) is adopted to select the optimal feature subset. Lastly, contrastive divergence (CD) and RMSspectral are used to train hybrid classification RBM (H-ClassRBM). The trained H-ClassRBM is used for TWS recognition. The PHM challenge 2010 data set is used to validate the proposed scheme. Experimental results show that the proposed features have better monotonicity and correlation than the classical features. Compared with CD and Adadelta, CD and Adagrad, and CD and stochastic gradient descent with momentum, the H-ClassRBM trained by CD and RMSspectral improves recognition accuracy by 1%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. Compared with feedforward neural network, probabilistic neural network, Gaussian kernel support vector machine, and H-ClassRBM, the proposed TWS recognition scheme improves recognition accuracy by 37%, 51%, 9%, and 8%, respectively. Therefore, the proposed TWS recognition scheme is beneficial in improving the recognition accuracy of TWS, and provides an effective guide for decision-making in the machining process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu KP, Zhang Y (2019) A generic tool wear model and its application to force modeling and wear monitoring in high speed milling. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao XC, Chen BQ, Yao B, Zhuang SQ (2019) An intelligent milling tool wear monitoring methodology based on convolutional neural network with derived wavelet frames coefficient. Appl Sci-Basel 9(18):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chi YJ, Dai W, Lu ZY, Wang MQ, Zhao Y (2018) Real-time estimation for cutting tool wear based on modal analysis of monitored signals. Appl Sci-Basel 8(5):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8050708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez-Arellano G, Terrazas G, Ratchev S (2019) Tool wear classification using time series imaging and deep learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(9-12):3647–3662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04090-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie ZY, Li JG, Lu Y (2019) Feature selection and a method to improve the performance of tool condition monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(9-12):3197–3206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2926-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao XP, Zhou G, Zhang ZK, Lu J, Ma JY (2019) Tool wear state recognition based on GWO-SVM with feature selection of genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(1-4):1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03906-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang GF, Xie QL, Zhang YC (2017) Tool condition monitoring system based on support vector machine and differential evolution optimization. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231(5):805–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415619871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benkedjouh T, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, Rechak S (2015) Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression. J Intell Manuf 26(2):213–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0774-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kong DD, Chen YJ, Li N (2018) Gaussian process regression for tool wear prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 104:556–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hui-bin S, Wei-long N, Jun-yang W (2015) Tool wear feature extraction based on Hilbert-Huang transformation. J Vibr Shock 34(4):158–164. https://doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2015.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu TI, Jolley B (2015) Tool condition monitoring (TCM) using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(9-12):1999–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6738-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo L, Li NP, Jia F, Lei YG, Lin J (2017) A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing 240:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Que ZJ, Xu ZG (2019) A data-driven health prognostics approach for steam turbines based on XGBoost and DTW. IEEE Access 7:93131–93138. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2927488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He ZY, Cheng WD, Wen WG (2020) A similarity comparison method of homologous fault response fragments under variable rotational speed. Shock Vib 2020:12–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8973678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Javed K, Gouriveau R, Zerhouni N, Nectoux P (2015) Enabling health monitoring approach based on vibration data for accurate prognostics. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(1):647–656. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2014.2327917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang B, Zhang LJ, Xu JW (2016) Degradation feature selection for remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(2):547–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong DD, Chen YJ, Li N (2017) Force-based tool wear estimation for milling process using Gaussian mixture hidden Markov models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5-8):2853–2865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0367-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao H, Shi XZ, Rodrigue AK, Feng JJ, Xia YC, Elhoseny M, Yuan XH, Gu LC (2019) Feature selection based on artificial bee colony and gradient boosting decision tree. Appl Soft Comput 74:634–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Z, Li YB, Jin SS, Zhang ZY, Wang H, Qi L, Zhou RL (2018) Modulation signal recognition based on information entropy and ensemble learning. Entropy 20(3):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20030198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Twardowski P, Wiciak-Pikula M (2019) Prediction of tool wear using artificial neural networks during turning of hardened steel. Materials 12(19):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khajavi MN, Nasernia E, Rostaghi M (2016) Milling tool wear diagnosis by feed motor current signal using an artificial neural network. J Mech Sci Technol 30(11):4869–4875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1005-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jegorowa A, Gorski J, Kurek J, Kruk M (2019) Initial study on the use of support vector machine (SVM) in tool condition monitoring in chipboard drilling. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 77(5):957–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-019-01428-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma M, Sun C, Chen XF, Zhang XW, Yan RQ (2019) A deep coupled network for health state assessment of cutting tools based on fusion of multisensory signals. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 15(12):6415–6424. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2912428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Larochelle H, Mandel M, Pascanu R, Bengio Y (2012) Learning algorithms for the classification restricted Boltzmann machine. J Mach Learn Res 13:643–669

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo LK, Zhang SF, Wang YD, Peng H (2018) An alternate method between generative objective and discriminative objective in training classification restricted Boltzmann machine. Knowl Based Syst 144:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yin J, Lv JC, Sang YS, Guo JX (2018) Classification model of restricted Boltzmann machine based on reconstruction error. Neural Comput Applic 29(11):1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2628-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Niu QM, Liu F, Tong QB, Cao JC, Zhang YH (2018) Health condition assessment of ball bearings using TOSELM. J Vibroeng 20(1):272–282. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.18978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Upadhya V, Sastry PS (2019) An overview of restricted Boltzmann machines. J Indian Inst Sci 99(2):225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-0102-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chaudhuri A (2019) The minimization of empirical risk through stochastic gradient descent with momentum algorithms. In: Silhavy R (ed) Artificial intelligence methods in intelligent algorithms, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 985. Springer International Publishing Ag, Cham, pp 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19810-7_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruder S (2016) An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv

  31. Zeiler MD (2012) ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method. Comput Sci

  32. Dauphin YN, de Vries H, Bengio Y (2015) Equilibrated adaptive learning rates for non-convex optimization. In: Cortes C, Lawrence ND, Lee DD, Sugiyama M, Garnett R (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 28, vol 28. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Neural Information Processing Systems (Nips), La Jolla,

  33. Carlson DE, Collins E, Hsieh YP, Carin L, Cevher V (2015) Preconditioned spectral descent for deep learning. In: Cortes C, Lawrence ND, Lee DD, Sugiyama M, Garnett R (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 28, vol 28. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Neural Information Processing Systems (Nips), La Jolla,

  34. Carlson D, Hsieh YP, Collins E, Carin L, Cevher V (2016) Stochastic spectral descent for discrete graphical models. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 10(2):296–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstsp.2015.2505684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li X, Lim BS, Zhou JH, Huang S, Phua SJ, Shaw KC, Er MJ (2009) Fuzzy neural network modelling for tool wear estimation in dry milling operation. In: Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, PHM 2009, September 27, 2009 - October 1, 2009, San Diego, CA, United States. Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, PHM 2009. Prognostics and Health Management Society, p et al.; General Atomics; IMPACT; Palo Alto Research Center (PARC); Ridgetop Group Inc.; Xerox

  36. Zhu KP, Mei T, Ye DS (2015) Online condition monitoring in micromilling: a force waveform shape analysis approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(6):3806–3813. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2015.2392713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lei Z, Zhou YQ, Sun BT, Sun WF (2020) An intrinsic timescale decomposition-based kernel extreme learning machine method to detect tool wear conditions in the milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(3-4):1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04689-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the State Key Science & Technology Program of China (Grant No. 2019ZX04012-001); National Natural Science Foundation of China (51905209); Industrial Technology Research and Development Project of Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission, China (2019C040-2); Young and Middle-aged Scientific and Technological Innovation leaders and Team Projects in Jilin Province, China (20190101015JH); and Program for JLU Science and Technology Innovative Research Team (JLUSTIRT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jialong He.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, G., Wang, Y., He, J. et al. Tool wear state recognition based on gradient boosting decision tree and hybrid classification RBM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110, 511–522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05890-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05890-x

Keywords

Navigation