Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the initial damage region in agate plates cut by abrasive waterjet (AWJ) process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The abrasive waterjet (AWJ) cutting process has been widely used in the gemstone processing industry due to its versatility and accuracy characteristics. The influence of the parameters involved in the AWJ process has been investigated by many authors, and it can be seen that in each application different responses are reported. In agate processing via AWJ, the final quality of the piece depends on the properties of the initial damage region (IDR), such as width and depth. The present study has purpose to investigate the influence of the standoff distance, traverse speed, working pressure, and abrasive mass flow rate on the depth and width of the IDR when cutting agates through AWJ. A set of 80 samples were analyzed, and the measurement of the depth and width of the IDR was performed through three-dimensional scanning using X-ray computed microtomography (XCM). This technique allows assessing the IDR in an accurate and reliable way. The results showed that, within the investigated range of parameters, the width and depth of the IDR vary between 0.3 and 0.7 mm. Also, the IDR in the agate plates is strongly influenced by the standoff distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Abrasive waterjet:

(AWJ)

Initial damage region:

(IDR)

Depth of initial damage region:

(DIDR)

Width of initial damage region:

(WIDR)

Working pressure of the waterjet:

(P)

X-ray computed microtomography:

(XCM)

Traverse speed:

(Vf)

Abrasive mass flow:

(\(\dot {m}_{A}\))

Standoff distance:

(dS)

Analysis of Variance:

(ANOVA)

References

  1. Li H, Wang J (2015) An experimental study of abrasive waterjet machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1-4):361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7245-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barp D, Neis PD, Ferreira N (2010) Contribuição ao estudo do processo de corte de ágata por jato dágua em formas complexas. Design e Tecnologia 01

  3. Lima CEA, Lebron R, de Souza AJ, Ferreira NF, Neis PD (2016) Study of influence of traverse speed and abrasive mass flowrate in abrasive water jet machining of gemstones. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83 (1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7529-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ipar CEAL, Neis PD, Ferreira NF, Heck DJ, Zibetti TF (2020) A new metric for assessing the surface roughness of agate plates cut by abrasive water jet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:4903–4912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04752-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kovacevic R (1991) Surface texture in abrasive waterjet cutting. J Manuf Syst 10:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Akkurt A (2010) Cut front geometry characterization in cutting applications of brass with abrasive water jet. J Mater Eng Perform 19(4):599–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-009-9513-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hlavac L (2009) Investigation of the abrasive water jet trajectory curvature inside the kerf. J Mater Process Technol 209:4154–4161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hlavac L, Hlavacova I, Gembalova L, Kalicinsky J, Fabian S, Mestanek J, Kmec J, Madr V Experimental method for the investigation of the abrasive water jet cutting quality. J Mater Process Technol 209(20):6190-6195 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.011. Special Issue: 1st International Conference on Abrasive Processes

  9. Arola D, Ramulu M (1996) A study of kerf characteristics in abrasive waterjet machining of graphite/epoxy composites. J Eng Mater Technol 118-2:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2804897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K (2012) An experimental study on the depth of cut of granite in abrasive waterjet cutting. Mater Manuf Process 27(5):538–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2011.593231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Çaydas U, Hasçalik A (2008) A study on surface roughness in abrasive waterjet machining process using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method. J Mater Process Technol 202:574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Momber A, Kovacevic R (1998) Principles of abrasive waterjet machining. Springer, Berlin

  13. Arola D, Ramulu M (1997) Material removal in abrasive waterjet machining of metals - surface integrity and texture. Wear 210(1-2):50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00087-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hloch S, Valicek J (2012) Topographical anomaly on surfaces created by abrasive waterjet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Armagan M, Arici AA (2017) Cutting performance of glass-vinyl ester composite by abrasive water jet. Mater Manuf Process 32(15):1715–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1269919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shahu P, Maity S (2020) Machining performance evaluation of Al 6061 T6 using abrasive water jet process. In: Shunmugam M, Kanthababu M (eds) Advances in Unconventional Machining and Composites, vol 1. Springer Nature Singapore

  17. Gupta V, Pandey P, Garg MP, Khanna R, Batra N (2014) Minimization of kerf taper angle and kerf width using Taguchi’s method in abrasive water jet machining of marble. Procedia Mater Sci 6:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. (1999). Gemological Institute of America: Essential Colored Stone - Reference guide, 1st edn

  19. Michelin C (2014) ÁGata do distrito mineiro de Salto do jacuí (Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil): uma caracterização com base em técnicas estratigráficas, petrográficas geoquímicas e isotópicas

  20. DNPM I (2005) Manual técnico de Gemas, 3rd edn

  21. Dana J et al (1997) Dana’s new mineralogy: the system of mineralogy of James Dwight Dana and Edward Salisbury Dana, 8th edn. Wiley, New York

  22. CIENTEC (2009) Características tecnológicas de rochas ornamentais do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, 1st edn

  23. Montgomery D (2012) Design and analysis of experiments, 8th edn. Wiley, New York. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=XQAcAAAAQBAJ

  24. Chen R, Zhang D, Wu Y (2018) Study on the influence of standoff distance on substrate damage under an abrasive water jet process by molecular dynamics simulation. Friction 6(2):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-017-0168-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang L, Folkes J, Kinnell P, Shipway P (2012) Mechanisms of damage initiation in a titanium alloy subjected to water droplet impact during ultra-high pressure plain waterjet erosion. J Mater Process Technol 212(09):1906–1915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Edmundo de Abreu e Lima Ipar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Abreu e Lima Ipar, C.E., Neis, P.D., Ferreira, N.F. et al. Analysis of the initial damage region in agate plates cut by abrasive waterjet (AWJ) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109, 2629–2638 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05831-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05831-8

Keywords

Navigation