Skip to main content
Log in

Ensemble transfer learning for refining stability predictions in milling using experimental stability states

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new approach for updating model-based stability chart predictions in milling based on experimental data is presented. The approach utilizes Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), which are pre-trained with simulated data that is generated by predicting machine dynamics through receptance coupling and evaluating stability through an analytical stability model. The weights in the DNN are fine-tuned by re-training the networks with a small experimental dataset containing only a few dozen samples. Target is to match network predictions with the experimentally observed stability states acquired under different cutting conditions. The presented approach avoids measurement or model-based estimation of cutting force coefficients as well as the measurement of tooltip dynamics or extensive model parameter identification, making it an attractive approach for industrial applications. In an experimental validation, where stability charts for various engagement conditions and different tool clamping lengths are predicted, a good match between predictions and experimental stability limits is achieved. It is shown that an ensemble learning method, where predictions of multiple networks are combined, can improve prediction accuracy. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the new approach requires approximately five times fewer experimental samples than previously proposed model-free machine learning approaches to reach the same prediction accuracy on a test set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Budak E, Altintas¸ Y, Armarego EJA (1996) Prediction of milling force coefficients from orthogonal cutting data. J Manuf Sci Eng 118(2):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altintas Y (2011) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Grossi N (2017) Accurate and fast measurement of specific cutting force coefficients changing with spindle speed. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 18(8):1173–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubeo MA, Schmitz TL (2016) Milling force modeling: a comparison of two approaches. Procedia Manufacturing 5:90–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campatelli G, Scippa A (2012) Prediction of milling cutting force coefficients for aluminum 6082-T4. Procedia CIRP 1:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmitz TL, Donalson RR (2000) Predicting high-speed machining dynamics by substructure analysis. CIRP Ann 49(1):303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitz TL, Davies MA, Kennedy MD (2001) Tool point frequency response prediction for high-speed machining by RCSA. J Manuf Sci Eng 123(4):700–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park SS, Altintas Y, Movahhedy M (2003) Receptance coupling for end mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(9):889–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Namazi M, Altintas Y, Abe T, Rajapakse N (2007) Modeling and identification of tool holder–spindle interface dynamics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(9):1333–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Albertelli P, Goletti M, Monno M (2013) A new receptance coupling substructure analysis methodology to improve chatter free cutting conditions prediction. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 72:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kops L, Vo DT (1990) Determination of the equivalent diameter of an end mill based on its compliance. CIRP Ann 39(1):93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozsahin O, Altintas Y (2015) Prediction of frequency response function (FRF) of asymmetric tools from the analytical coupling of spindle and beam models of holder and tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 92:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Zhang W-H, Ma Y-C, Wan M (2015) Generalized method for the analysis of bending, torsional and axial receptances of tool–holder–spindle assembly. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 99:48–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthias W, Özşahin O, Altintas Y, Denkena B (2016) Receptance coupling based algorithm for the identification of contact parameters at holder–tool interface. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 13:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Özsahin O, Ertürk A, Özgüven HN, Budak E (2009) A closed-form approach for identification of dynamical contact parameters in spindle–holder–tool assemblies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsubara A, Asano K, Muraki T (2015) Contactless dynamic tests for analyzing effects of speed and temperature on the natural frequency of a machine tool spindle High Speed Machining, 1

  17. Cao Y, Altintas Y (2005) A general method for the modeling of spindle-bearing systems. J Mech Des 126(6):1089–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jamil N, Yusoff AR (2016) Electromagnetic actuator for determining frequency response functions of dynamic modal testing on milling tool. Measurement 82:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Postel M, Bugdayci NB, Monnin J, Kuster F, Wegener K (2018) Improved stability predictions in milling through more realistic load conditions. Procedia CIRP 77:102–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaghbani I, Songmene V (2009) Estimation of machine-tool dynamic parameters during machining operation through operational modal analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(12–13):947–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozsahin O, Budak E, Ozguven HN (2015) In-process tool point FRF identification under operational conditions using inverse stability solution. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grossi N, Campatelli G (2016) Identification of machine tool dynamics under operational conditions, in Annual Meeting of the Machine Tool Technologies Research Foundation (MTTRF 2016): San Francisco, CA, USA

  23. Eynian M (2019) In-process identification of modal parameters using dimensionless relationships in milling chatter. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 143:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedrich J, Hinze C, Renner A, Verl A, Lechler A (2017) Estimation of stability lobe diagrams in milling with continuous learning algorithms. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 43:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cherukuri H, Perez B, Selles M, Schmitz T (2019) Machining chatter prediction using a data learning model. J Manuf Mater Process 3:45

  26. Budak E, Ertürk A, Özgüven HN (2006) A modeling approach for analysis and improvement of spindle-holder-tool assembly dynamics. CIRP Ann 55(1):369–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Park SS, Chae J (2008) Joint identification of modular tools using a novel receptance coupling method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35(11):1251–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ertürk A, Özgüven HN, Budak E (2007) Effect analysis of bearing and interface dynamics on tool point FRF for chatter stability in machine tools by using a new analytical model for spindle–tool assemblies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Budak E, Altintas Y (1998) Analytical prediction of chatter stability in milling—part I: general formulation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 120(1):22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liao J, Zhang J, Feng P, Yu D, Wu Z (2017) Identification of contact stiffness of shrink-fit tool-holder joint based on fractal theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(5):2173–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mamedov A, Layegh KSE, Lazoglu I (2013) Machining forces and tool deflections in micro milling. Procedia CIRP 8:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murphy KP (2012) Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. MIT Press

  33. Friedrich J, Hinze C, Lechler A, Verl A (2016) On-line learning artificial neural networks for stability classification of milling processes. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).P. 357-364

Download references

Acknowledgments

The contribution of Georg Fischer Machining Solutions (GFMS) to this work is greatly appreciated.

Funding

This study received financial support from the Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) of the Federal Department of Economic Affairs of Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Postel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Postel, M., Bugdayci, B. & Wegener, K. Ensemble transfer learning for refining stability predictions in milling using experimental stability states. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 4123–4139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05322-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05322-w

Keywords

Navigation