Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective optimization of experimental and analytical residual stresses in pre-stressed cutting of thin-walled ring using glowworm swarm optimization algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an analytical prediction model was utilized to predict the residual stresses induced during pre-stressed cutting of thin-walled ring, and the results were validated by experiments. General multivariate regression predictive models were presented to characterize the relationship between machining parameters and key characteristic values of residual stresses. These predictive models were used to build multi-objective optimization models to select the optimal machining parameters in process planning decision. The objectives are to minimize the tensile surface residual stress and to maximize the maximum compressive residual stress and processing efficiency and be chosen as related to industrial applications. An adaptive step-size multi-objective glowworm swarm optimization (MOGSO) algorithm was employed in optimizing parameters including cutting speed, cutting feed and pre-tightening torque. Optimization results demonstrate the superiority of the improved algorithm over the traditional MOGSO. The optimum machining parameters calculated from the predicted results were represented in both objective function and decision variable spaces. Further experimental verification results verified the effectiveness of the optimization model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rao BS, Malkapuram D, Ramjee E (2018) Force and deformation analysis for determination of optimum fixture configuration. Int J Appl Eng Res 13(7):4675–4681

    Google Scholar 

  2. Do MD, Son Y, Choi HJ (2018) Optimal workpiece positioning in flexible fixtures for thin-walled components. Comput Aided Des 95:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sridhar G, Ramesh Babu P (2018) Influence of tool parameters on machining distortion of thin wall thin floor components. Adv Mater Process Technol 4(1):61–85

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stančeková D, Steklac D, Petru J, Zlámal T, Sadilek M, Janota M, Kordik M (2016) Influence of machining and heat treatment on deformations of thin-walled bearings. Mater Sci Forum 862:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J, Zhang D, Wu B, Luo M (2018) Prediction of distortion induced by machining residual stresses in thin-walled components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9–12):4153–4162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Masoudi S, Amini S, Saeidi E, Eslami-Chalander H (2015) Effect of machining-induced residual stress on the distortion of thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(1–4):597–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen W, Ni L, Xue J (2008) Deformation control through fixture layout design and clamping force optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(9–10):860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moehring HC, Wiederkehr P, Gonzalo O, Kolar P (2018) Intelligent fixtures for the manufacturing of low rigidity components. Springer International

  9. Zawada-Michałowska M, Kuczmaszewski J, Pieśko P (2018) Influence of pre-machining on post-machining deformation of thin-walled elements made of aluminium alloy EN AW-2024. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing 393(1): 012100

  10. Wang M, Liu YN, Liu ZG, Wang P (2017) Influence of initial residual stress and cutting stress on machining deformation of thin-walled parts. J Beijing Univ Technol 43(8):1141–1147 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gao H, Zhang Y, Wu Q, Li B (2018) Investigation on influences of initial residual stress on thin-walled part machining deformation based on a semi-analytical model. J Mater Process Technol 262:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng RT, Li YG, Tang XZ, Zhou Z (2016) Experimental study on prestressed cutting of alloy ring parts. Mater Sci Forum Trans Tech Publ 836:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng R, Liu K, Tang X, Liao M, Hu Y (2019) Effect of prestress on cutting of nickel-based superalloy GH4169. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(1–4):813–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mia M, Dey PR, Hossain MS, Arafat MT, Asaduzzaman M, Ullah MS, Zobaer ST (2018) Taguchi S/N based optimization of machining parameters for surface roughness, tool wear and material removal rate in hard turning under MQL cutting condition. Measurement 122:380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Toulfatzis AI, Pantazopoulos GA, David CN, Sagris DS, Paipetis AS (2018) Machinability of eco-friendly lead-free brass alloys: cutting-force and surface-roughness optimization. Metals 8(4):250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patole PB, Kulkarni VV (2018) Optimization of process parameters based on surface roughness and cutting force in MQL turning of AISI 4340 using nano fluid. Mater Today Proc 5(1):104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salvati E, Korsunsky AM (2018) A simplified FEM eigenstrain residual stress reconstruction for surface treatments in arbitrary 3D geometries. Int J Mech Sci 138:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen Q, Liu Z, Hua Y, Zhao J, Lv W, Mohsan AUH (2018) Effects of cutting edge microgeometry on residual stress in orthogonal cutting of Inconel 718 by FEM. Materials 11(6):1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang XD, Zhang XM, Leopold J, Ding H (2018) Analytical model for prediction of residual stress in dynamic orthogonal cutting process. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(1):011002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan Z, Feng Y, Ji X, Liang SY (2018) Turning induced residual stress prediction of AISI 4130 considering dynamic recrystallization. Mach Sci Technol 22(3):507–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arrazola PJ, Özel T, Umbrello D, Davies M, Jawahir IS (2013) Recent advances in modelling of metal machining processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):695–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yildiz AR, Abderazek H, Mirjalili S (2019) A comparative study of recent non-traditional methods for mechanical design optimization. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2019:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ulutan D, Özel T (2013) Multiobjective optimization of experimental and simulated residual stresses in turning of nickel-alloy IN100. Mater Manuf Process 28(7):835–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Yang X, Ren C, Chen G, Wang Y (2015) Multiobjective optimization of cutting parameters in Ti-6Al-4V milling process using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):941–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yildiz AR (2013) A new hybrid differential evolution algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Appl Soft Comput 13(3):1561–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Datta R, Regis RG (2016) A surrogate-assisted evolution strategy for constrained multi-objective optimization. Expert Syst Appl 57:270–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palacios JA, Olvera D, Urbikain G, Elías-Zúñiga A, Martínez-Romero O, López de Lacalleb LN, Rodrígueza C, Martínez-Alfaroa H (2018) Combination of simulated annealing and pseudo spectral methods for the optimum removal rate in turning operations of nickel-based alloys. Adv Eng Softw 115:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jurkovic Z, Cukor G, Brezocnik M, Brajkovic T (2018) A comparison of machine learning methods for cutting parameters prediction in high speed turning process. J Intell Manuf 29(8):1683–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bagaber SA, Yusoff AR (2017) Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters to minimize power consumption in dry turning of stainless steel 316. J Clean Prod 157:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh G, Gupta MK, Mia M, Sharma VS (2018) Modeling and optimization of tool wear in MQL-assisted milling of Inconel 718 superalloy using evolutionary techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1–4):481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yıldız BS, Yıldız AR (2017) Moth-flame optimization algorithm to determine optimal machining parameters in manufacturing processes. Mater Test 59(5):425–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zainal N, Zain AM, Radzi NHM, Othman MR (2016) Glowworm swarm optimization (GSO) for optimization of machining parameters. J Intell Manuf 27(4):797–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yıldız AR, Yıldız BS, Sait SM, Li X (2019) The Harris hawks, grasshopper and multi-verse optimization algorithms for the selection of optimal machining parameters in manufacturing operations. Mater Test 61(8):725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nan Z, Yaoyao S, Chen Y, Zhen C, Jiang L (2019) Multi-objective optimization of processing parameters for disc-mill cutter machining blisk-tunnel based on GRA-RBF-FA method. J Northwest Polytechn Univ 37(1):160–166 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiangyan X, Gaoyan Z, Shoufeng Y (2017) Improved NSGA-II algorithm and its application in optimization of machining parameters. Comput Eng Appl 53(13):227–234 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gandomi AH, Yangand XS, Alavi AH (2011) Mixed variable structural optimization using firefly algorithm. Comput Struct 89(23–24):2325–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Qiong P, Liao Y, Hao P, He X, Hui C (2019) A self-adaptive step glowworm swarm optimization approach. Int J Comput Intell Appl 18(01):1950004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang F, Butt SI (2017) Identification of a new friction model at tool-chip interface in dry orthogonal cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(1–4):921–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ulutan D, Alaca BE, Lazoglu I (2007) Analytical modelling of residual stresses in machining. J Mater Process Technol 183(1):77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang D, Liu Z, Ren X, Zhuang P (2016) Hybrid modeling with finite element and statistical methods for residual stress prediction in peripheral milling of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mech Sci 108:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Krishnanand K N, Ghose D (2005) Detection of multiple source locations using a glowworm metaphor with applications to collective robotics. In Proceedings 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2005. SIS 2005. (pp. 84–91). IEEE

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Major Science and Technology Project in Henan Province (171100210300), Key Scientific Research Projects of Henan Colleges and Universities (20B460001), and Anyang Science and Technology Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anyang Institute of Technology, School of Mechanical Engineering, Anyang, 455000, China

    Chengyan Zhang, Lixin Wang, Xiaoli Zu & Wuzhou Meng

Authors
  1. Chengyan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lixin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoli Zu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wuzhou Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengyan Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Wang, L., Zu, X. et al. Multi-objective optimization of experimental and analytical residual stresses in pre-stressed cutting of thin-walled ring using glowworm swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 3897–3908 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05317-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05317-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation