Skip to main content
Log in

A data-driven model for weld bead monitoring during the laser welding assisted by magnetic field

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, a data-driven model is developed to monitor the seam during the laser beam welding under the influence of an external magnetic field (LBW-AMF). Firstly, a visible LBW-AMF system is built for tracking the laser melting pool and keyhole. Then, the features of the laser melting pool and keyhole are extracted with image processing techniques. The approach for an ensemble of different neural networks which includes radial basis function neural network, back-propagation neural network, and generalized regression neural network is proposed to establish the correlations of the characteristics of the laser melting pool and keyhole and the welding seam. Finally, LBW-AMF experimental results are obtained to validate the performance of the proposed data-driven model. Results illustrate that the developed model can provide a reliable result for monitoring the weld bead, which could give guidance for controlling the processing parameters in real time to improve the weld quality for practical LBW-AMF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AK:

The area of the keyhole

WM:

The width of the molten pool

BPNN:

Back-propagation neural network

ENN:

The ensemble of neural networks

GRNN:

Generalized regression neural network

GTAW:

Gas tungsten arc welding

LK:

The length of the keyhole

LBW-AMF:

Laser beam welding assisted by magnetic field

MAE:

Maximum absolute error

WK:

The width of keyhole

MF:

Magnetic field

References

  1. Zhou Q, Cao L, Zhou H, Huang X (2018) Prediction of angular distortion in the fiber laser keyhole welding process based on a variable-fidelity approximation modeling approach. J Intell Manuf 29:719–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang L, Hua X, Wu D, Ye Y (2019) Role of welding speed on keyhole-induced porosity formation based on experimental and numerical study in fiber laser welding of Al alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li S, Chen G, Zhou C (2015) Effects of welding parameters on weld geometry during high-power laser welding of thick plate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stavridis J, Papacharalampopoulos A, Stavropoulos P (2017) Quality assessment in laser welding: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:1825–1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. You D, Gao X, Katayama S (2015) WPD-PCA-based laser welding process monitoring and defects diagnosis by using FNN and SVM. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62:628–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J, Zhang Y, Wu C, Padhy GK (2019) Suppression of undercut defects in high-speed GMAW through a compound magnetic field. J Mater Process Technol 274:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fritzsche A, Avilov V, Gumenyuk A, Hilgenberg K, Rethmeier M (2016) High power laser beam welding of thick-walled ferromagnetic steels with electromagnetic weld pool support. Phys Procedia 83:362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gatzen M, Tang Z, Vollertsen F, Mizutani M, Katayama S (2011) X-ray investigation of melt flow behavior under magnetic stirring regime in laser beam welding of aluminum. J Laser Appl 23:032002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang Z, Gatzen M (2010) Influence on the dilution by laser welding of aluminum with magnetic stirring. Phys Procedia 5:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachmann M, Avilov V, Gumenyuk A, Rethmeier M (2011) CFD simulation of the liquid metal flow in high power laser welding of aluminum with electromagnetic weld pool support. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf.: 179–184

  11. Zhou J, Tsai H-L (2007) Effects of electromagnetic force on melt flow and porosity prevention in pulsed laser keyhole welding. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:2217–2235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Wei Y, Zhan X, Gao Q, Zhang D, Gao X (2018) Influence of magnetic field orientation on molten pool dynamics during magnet-assisted laser butt welding of thick aluminum alloy plates. Opt Laser Technol 104:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen J, Wei Y, Zhan X, Gu C, Zhao X (2018) Thermoelectric currents and thermoelectric-magnetic effects in full-penetration laser beam welding of aluminum alloy with magnetic field support. Int J Heat Mass Transf 127:332–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen X, Luo M, Hu R, Li R, Liang L, Pang S (2019) Thermo-electromagnetic effect on weld microstructure in magnetically assisted laser welding of austenite steel. J Manuf Process 41:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Torabi A, Kolahan F (2018) Optimizing pulsed Nd:YAG laser beam welding process parameters to attain maximum ultimate tensile strength for thin AISI316L sheet using response surface methodology and simulated annealing algorithm. Opt Laser Technol 103:300–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao JQ, Qin GL, Yang JL, He JG, Zhang T, Wu CS (2011) Image processing of weld pool and keyhole in Nd:YAG laser welding of stainless steel based on visual sensing. T Nonfree Metal Soc 21:423–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin Z, Li H, Jia G, Gao H (2016) Dynamic nonlinear modeling of 3D weld pool surface in GTAW. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 39:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Gao X, Katayama S (2015) Weld appearance prediction with BP neural network improved by genetic algorithm during disk laser welding. J Manuf Syst 34:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu YK, Zhang YM (2014) Model-based predictive control of weld penetration in gas tungsten arc welding. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 22:955–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao X, Zhong X, You D, Katayama S (2013) Kalman filtering compensated by radial basis function neural network for seam tracking of laser welding. IEEE Trans Contr Sys Techn 21:1916–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen J, Wang T, Gao X, Wei L (2018) Real-time monitoring of high-power disk laser welding based on support vector machine. Comput Ind 94:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. You DY, Gao XD, Katayama S (2013) Review of laser welding monitoring. Sci Technol Weld Join 19:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leng H, Li X, Zhu J, Tang H, Zhang Z, Ghadimi N (2018) A new wind power prediction method based on ridgelet transforms, hybrid feature selection and closed-loop forecasting. Adv Eng Inform 36:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeghlache S, Mekki H, Bouguerra A, Djerioui A (2018) Actuator fault tolerant control using adaptive RBFNN fuzzy sliding mode controller for coaxial octorotor UAV. ISA Trans 80:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Addeh J, Ebrahimzadeh A, Azarbad M, Ranaee V (2014) Statistical process control using optimized neural networks: a case study. ISA Trans 53:1489–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Yang D, Zhang C (2018) Relaxed conditions for convergence analysis of online back-propagation algorithm with L 2 regularizer for Sigma-Pi-Sigma neural network. Neurocomputing 272:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zeng X, Zhen Z, He J, Han L (2018) A feature selection approach based on sensitivity of RBFNNs. Neurocomputing 275:2200–2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li H-z, Guo S, Li C-j, Sun J-q (2013) A hybrid annual power load forecasting model based on generalized regression neural network with fruit fly optimization algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 37:378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xie Y, Li C, Lv Y, Yu C (2019) Predicting lightning outages of transmission lines using generalized regression neural network. Appl Soft Comput 78:438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang X, You M, Mao Z, Yuan P (2016) Tree-structure ensemble general regression neural networks applied to predict the molten steel temperature in ladle furnace. Adv Eng Inform 30:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pani AK, Mohanta HK (2015) Online monitoring and control of particle size in the grinding process using least square support vector regression and resilient back propagation neural network. ISA Trans 56:206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Song X, Lv L, Li J, Sun W, Zhang J (2018) An advanced and robust ensemble surrogate model: extended adaptive hybrid functions. J Mech Des 140:041402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou, Q., Wang, Y., Choi, S. K., Cao, L., & Gao, Z. (2018). Robust optimization for reducing welding-induced angular distortion in fiber laser keyhole welding under process parameter uncertainty. Applied Thermal Engineering, 129, 893–906.

  34. Qian, J., Yi, J., Cheng, Y., Liu, J., & Zhou, Q. (2019). A sequential constraints updating approach for Kriging surrogate model-assisted engineering optimization design problem. Engineering with Computers, 1–17.

  35. Zhou, Q., Wu, J., Xue, T., & Jin, P. (2019). A two-stage adaptive multi-fidelity surrogate model-assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for computationally expensive problems. Engineering with Computers, 1–17.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 51805179, and the National Defense Innovation Program under Grant No. 18-163-00-TS-004-033-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lili Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, L., Zhang, L. & Wu, Y. A data-driven model for weld bead monitoring during the laser welding assisted by magnetic field. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 475–487 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05028-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05028-z

Keywords

Navigation