Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Locating method and motion stroke design of flexible assembly tooling for multiple aircraft components

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To get an accurate dimensional size/shape/spatial and assembly accuracy, flexible assembly tooling is developed and applied in aviation production, instead of traditional dedicated rigid tooling. Its configuration can be adjusted to fit different assembly environments and support/locate different components together in correct relative positions. For multiple aircraft components, the optimal design on flexible assembly tooling system, i.e., flexible locating method and motion stroke of different locating units, was studied in this paper. Firstly, to assemble the multiple components with a flexible method, the optional geometric features were defined and divided into several groups, with cluster analysis. Secondly, with two-stage progressive reasoning and the polychromatic set theory, the precise logical mapping relationship between product assembly/coordination requirements and detailed tooling locating methods was proposed. Thirdly, considering the constraints of assembly operation space, assembly constraints (such as assembly loads and locating freedom), product posture, and other specific assembly factors, a design procedure with quantitative analysis and containing eleven steps was proposed and modeled, and then solved with intelligent algorithm. Lastly, flexible design for assembling four different wing flap components was optimized to verify the methodology’s feasibility. The flexible assembly system has a compact/simplified structure, and a sufficient assembly operation space. The layout scheme of the comprised units distributes by three rows, and parallel to each other. And the locating function of end locating effectors is highly integrated with a good flexibility degree. Combined with the practical design and assembly process, the motion stroke fits well with flexible assembly requirements, demonstrating a good locating/assembly performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arista R, Falgarone H (2017) Flexible best fit assembly of large aircraft components. Airbus A350 XWB case study. IFIP international conference on product lifecycle management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72905-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ola A (2015) Quality modeling case study at GKN Aerospace Sweden. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Master Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cecil J, Mayer R, Hari U (1996) An integrated methodology for fixture design. J Intell Manuf 7(2):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Drouot A, Zhao R, Irving L, Sanderson D, Ratchev S (2018) Measurement assisted assembly for high accuracy aerospace manufacturing. 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (INCOM 2018) 51(11):393–398

  5. Bakker O, Popov A, Ratchev S (2017) Variation analysis of automated wing box assembly. CIRP conference on manufacturing systems 1-6

  6. Guo F, Zou F, Liu J, Wang Z (2018) Working mode in aircraft manufacturing based on digital coordination model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5–8):1547–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bullen G (2013) Automated/mechanized drilling and countersinking of airframes. SAE International Press, Warrendale

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Millar, A, Kihlman, H (2009) Reconfigurable flexible tooling for aerospace wing assembly. Proceedings of the SAE 2009 AeroTech Congress & Exhibition, Seattle

  9. Albert S (2008) Flexible fixture. US Patent, US7444742 B2

  10. Lu J, Zhou K (2011) Multi-point location theory, method, and application for flexible tooling system in aircraft manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(5–8):729–736

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Dang X, Xie B, Hu Y (2015) Flexible tooling design technology for aircraft fuselage panel component pre-assembly. Assem Autom 35(2):166–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tadic B, Bogdanovic B, Jeremic B, Todorovic P, Luzanin O, Budak I, Vukelic D (2013) Locating and clamping of complex geometry workpieces with skewed holes in multiple-constraint conditions. Assem Autom 33(4):386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitehouse J, Wash G (1997) Positioning system for supporting structural components during assembly. US Patent, US5659939

  14. Freeland M (2009) Reconfigurable workpiece support fixture. US patent, US2009/0322008 A1

  15. Clifton D, James P, Michael A, Thomas H, Eric D, James J, Alan D (2001) System and method for assembling an aircraft. US Patent, US6230382

  16. Erdem I, Helgosson P, Kihlman H (2016) Development of automated flexible tooling as enabler in wing box assembly. Procedia CIRP 44:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keller C, Putz M (2016) Force-controlled adjustment of car body fixtures–verification and performance of the new approach. Procedia CIRP 44:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Munk C, Nelson P (2001) Determinant wing assembly US Patent, US6314630

  19. Qiu B, Jiang J, Ke Y (2011) A new principle and device for large aircraft components gaining accurate support by ball joint. Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys&Eng) 12(5):405–414

  20. Fan W, Zheng L, Wang Y (2018) An automated reconfigurable flexible fixture for aerospace pipeline assembly before welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(9–12):3791–3811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jamshidi J, Maropoulos PG (2011) Methodology for high accuracy installation of sustainable jigs and fixtures. In: Advances in Sustainable Manufacturing, pp 149–155 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20183-7_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Olabanji O, Mpofu K, Battaia O (2016) Design, simulation and experimental investigation of a novel reconfigurable assembly fixture for press brakes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1–4):663–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J, Hu S, Ward A (1999) Workspace synthesis for flexible fixturing of stampings. J Manuf Sci Eng 121:478–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kong Z, Cegiarek D (2006) Fixture workspace synthesis for reconfigurable assembly using procrustes-based pairwise configuration optimization. J Manuf Syst 25(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang H, Jiang J, Ke Y (2015) Optimal selection of the supporting points of large component aligned and positioned by parallel manipulator. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 230(10):3066–3075

    Google Scholar 

  26. Modrak V, Soltysova Z (2018) Development of operational complexity measure for selection of optimal layout design alternative. Int J Prod Res 56(24):7280–7295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Masoumi A, Shahi V (2018) Fixture layout optimization in multi-station sheet metal assembly considering assembly sequence and datum scheme. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Z, Wang X, Wang X, Cui F, Cheng H (2019) A simulation-based approach for plant layout design and production planning. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(3):1217–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Q, Dou Y, Li J, Ke Y, Keogh P, Maropoulos P (2017) An assembly gap control method based on posture alignment of wing panels in aircraft assembly. Assem Autom 37(4):422–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bejlegaard M, Elmaraghy W, Brunoe T, Andersen A, Nielsen K (2018) Methodology for reconfigurable fixture architecture design. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 23(11):172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Phoomboplab T, Ceglarek D (2008) Process yield improvement through optimum design of fixture layouts in 3D multistation assembly systems. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(6):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang D, Yin L (2016) Using an engineering change propagation method to support aircraft assembly tooling design. Proceedings of the 6th international Asia conference on industrial engineering and management innovation. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-148-2_93

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rabbani M, Elahi S, Javadi B (2017) A comprehensive quadratic assignment problem for an integrated layout design of final assembly line and manufacturing feeder cells. Des Sci Let 6(2):165–192

  34. Xing Y, Chen W, Li X, Lu J (2015) Multi-station fixture location layout optimization design for sheet metal parts. J Comput Theor Nanosci 12(9):2903–2908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paramasivam V, Padmanaban K, Senthil V (2010) Optimum design selection of jigs/fixtures using digraph and matrix methods. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 20(1):358–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Prabhaharan G, Padmanaban K, Krishnakumar R (2007) Machining fixture layout optimization using FEM and evolutionary techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(11–12):1090–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou S, Qiu C, Liu Z, Tan J (2018) A rapid design method of anti-deformation fixture layout for thin-walled structures. In: Advances in Mechanical Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6553-8_48

    Google Scholar 

  38. Krishnakumar K, Melkote S (2000) Machining fixture layout optimization using the genetic algorithm. Int J Mach Tool Manu 40(4):579–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vasundara M, Padmanaban K, Sabareeswaran M, RajGanesh M (2012) Machining fixture layout design for milling operation using FEA ANN and RSM. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo F, Zou F, Liu J, Zhao B, Wang Z (2018) Comprehensive identification of aircraft coordination feature based on complete importance modeling and its engineering application. Assem Autom 38(4):398–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu Z, Li Y, Zhang J, Cheng H, Jiang S, Tang W (2012) A dynamic assembly model for assembly sequence planning of complex product based on polychromatic sets theory. Assem Autom 32(2):152–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang B, Wang Z, Yang Y, Kang Y, Li X (2017) Optimum fixture locating layout for sheet metal part by integrating kriging with cuckoo search algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(1–4):327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Beltran A, Mendoza S (2018) Symmetrichull: a convex hull algorithm based on 2d geometry and symmetry. IEEE Lat Am Trans 16(8):2289–2295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang J, Qin X, Xie C, Chen H, Lei J (2018) Optimization design on dynamic load sharing performance for an in-wheel motor speed reducer based on genetic algorithm. Mech Mach Theory 122(4):132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51805502), Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (No. 2017ZE25005), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China (No. MJ-2017-XX), and National Defense Industrial Technology Development Program of China (Grant No. JCKY2019205B002). They would also like to thank the editors and the anonymous referees for their insightful comments

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing, 100024, China

    Feiyan Guo & Fang Zou

  2. The Key Laboratory of Contemporary Design and Integrated Manufacturing Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, China

    Zhongqi Wang

  3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China

    Jianhua Liu

  4. School of Control Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China

    Xudong Zhao

Authors
  1. Feiyan Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhongqi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianhua Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fang Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xudong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feiyan Guo.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, F., Wang, Z., Liu, J. et al. Locating method and motion stroke design of flexible assembly tooling for multiple aircraft components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 549–571 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04940-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04940-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation