Loss of production speed is an unavoidable reality for process manufacturers. Reduced production speeds are shown to consume 9–15% of available production capacity in various production contexts and create substantial costs for capital-intensive process industries. Amongst the least examined of the six big efficiency losses measured within total productive maintenance, speed loss presents significant opportunities for potential efficiency improvements in manufacturing companies. Based on the literature, this paper presents a framework of the factors related to speed loss, including three overall dimensions: technology factors, human factors and product factors. Next, a case study of two production lines to investigate this framework and quantify the scale of speed loss for the factors identified in the case study. For quantification, generalised least squares regression is performed to study the relationship between each factor and speed loss. The analysis of the production data reveals that technology and human factors have the strongest correlations with speed losses in this industry and account for the most speed loss. This research can directly support operational improvement initiatives in practice by identifying the factors with the strongest relationships to speed loss, aiding practitioners to select the most relevant means to improve speed and identify appropriate overall equipment effectiveness targets.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Nakajima S (1988) Introduction to total productive maintenance (TPM). Productivity Press, Cambridge
Tsarouhas P (2007) Implementation of total productive maintenance in food industry: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng 13:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510710735087
Ljungberg Õ (1998) Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness as a basis for TPM activities. Int J Oper Prod Manag 18:495–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579810206334
Ahmed S, Hassan MH, Taha Z (2004) State of implementation of TPM in SMIs: a survey study in Malaysia. J Qual Maint Eng 10:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510410539178
Nakajima S (1989) TPM Development Program: implementing total productive maintenance. Productivity Press, Cambridge
Zuashkiani A, Rahmandad H, Jardine AKS (2011) Mapping the dynamics of overall equipment effectiveness to enhance asset management practices. J Qual Maint Eng 17:74–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511111116268
Jonsson P, Lesshammar M (1999) Evaluation and improvement of manufacturing performance measurement systems - the role of OEE. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19:55–78
Benjamin SJ, Marathamuthu MS, Murugaiah U (2015) The use of 5-WHYs technique to eliminate OEE’s speed loss in a manufacturing firm. J Qual Maint Eng 21:419–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-09-2013-0062
Hedman R, Subramaniyan M, Almström P (2016) Analysis of critical factors for automatic measurement of OEE. Procedia CIRP 57:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.023
Ljungberg Õ (1997) Att Förstå & Tillämpa TPM (in Swedish). Novum Grafiska AB, Gothenburg
Dal B, Tugwell P, Greatbanks R (2000) Overall equipment effectiveness as a measure of operational improvement – a practical analysis. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20:1488–1502. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010355750
Muchiri P, Pintelon L (2008) Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): literature review and practical application discussion. Int J Prod Res 46:3517–3535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601142645
De Ron AJ, Rooda JE (2006) OEE and equipment effectiveness: an evaluation. Int J Prod Res 44:4987–5003. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600573402
Chan FTS, Lau HCW, Ip RWL et al (2005) Implementation of total productive maintenance: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 95:71–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.021
Ahmad N, Hossen J, Ali SM (2018) Improvement of overall equipment efficiency of ring frame through total productive maintenance: a textile case. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0783-2
Morales Méndez JD, Rodriguez RS (2017) Total productive maintenance (TPM) as a tool for improving productivity: a case study of application in the bottleneck of an auto-parts machining line. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0052-4
Ohunakin OS, Leramo RO (2012) TPM implementation in a beverage industry. J Eng Appl Sci 7:128–133
Tsarouhas PH (2013) Equipment performance evaluation in a production plant of traditional Italian cheese. Int J Prod Res 51:5897–5907. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.807373
Ogle RA, Carpenter AR (2014) Calculating the capacity of chemical plants. Chem Eng Prog 110:59–63
Anderson S, Sedatole KL (2013) Evidence on the cost hierarchy: the association between resource consumption and production activities. J Manag Account Res 25:119–141. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50293
Fisher ML, Ittner CD (1999) The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: empirical evidence and simulation analysis. Manag Sci 45:771–786. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.6.771
Allwood JM, Childs THC, Clare AT et al (2015) Manufacturing at double the speed. J Mater Process Technol 229:729–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.028
Aboutaleb A, Kang PS, Hamzaoui R, Duffy A (2017) Standalone closed-form formula for the throughput rate of asynchronous normally distributed serial flow lines. J Manuf Syst 43:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.12.006
Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (2008) Factory physics, 3rd edn. Waveland Press, Inc., Long Grove
De Ron AJ, Rooda JE (2005) Equipment effectiveness: OEE revisited. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 18:190–196. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2004.836657
Berry WL, Cooper MC (1999) Manufacturing flexibility: methods for measuring the impact of product variety on performance in process industries. J Oper Manag 17:163–178
SEMI (2014) Specification for definition and measurement of equipment productivity, SEMI E079-0814E. Mt. View, CA
Nurani RK, Akella R (1992) Quality and speed trade-offs in manufacturing systems. In: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Nice, France, pp 1145–1149
Yin RK (2018) Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th Ed, Los Angeles
Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC (1979) Link manufacturing process and product life cycles. Harv Bus Rev 57:133–140
Google (2018) Google Translate. https://translate.google.com/. Accessed 1 Jun 2018
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S et al (2018) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models
Wooldridge JM (2006) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 3rd edn. Thomson Higher Education, Mason
The researchers thank the Innovation Fund of Denmark for its sponsorship of this research.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Trattner, A., Hvam, L. & Haug, A. Why slow down? Factors affecting speed loss in process manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 2021–2034 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04559-4
- Speed loss
- Total productive maintenance
- Overall equipment effectiveness
- Process industry