Skip to main content
Log in

General characterization of peripheral milled surface geometry by feature element

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional peripheral milled surface models, whether resulting from analytical or numerical method, are targeted at solving numerical points of the surface. However, the independent coordinate point is lack of geometric or physical meaning due to its incompetence of description for milled surface geometry and connection with milling conditions, unless all the discrete points are engaged. Such surface characterization or the corresponding modelling method based on point is flawed inherently that lead to its less suitable for study of surface parameters or effect factors. Therefore, a new idea and methodology are introduced. Firstly, geometric feature element of the peripheral milling surface is defined, by analyzing periodic feature of the surface residue profile in stable milling process with the presence of cutter runout. Then, taking three and four teeth cutter milling situations as example, systematic theories and methods are developed for calculating and analyzing of the feature element. Thirdly, via simulation tests of milled surface geometry, superior modelling performance in accuracy and efficiency of the feature-based method are verified in contrast with the integrated analytic and numerical method, the simulated surface based on which is perceived as the theoretical true result. All the effort devoted to this new idea proves that the defined geometric feature element is qualified for characterization of milled surface geometry, which not only improves the surface model but also will be convenient to the further study in surface quality and functionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martellotti ME (1941) An analysis of the milling process. Trans ASME 63:677–700

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martellotti ME (1945) An analysis of the milling process, part ii-down milling. Trans ASME 67:233–251

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kline WA, Devor RE, Shareef IA (1982) The prediction of surface accuracy in end milling. ASME J Eng Ind 104(3):272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Babin TS, Lee JM, Sutherland JW, Kapoor SG (1985) A model for end milled surface topography. Manufacturing Engineering Transactions pp. 362-368

  5. Sutherland JW, DeVor RE (1986) An improved method for cutting force and surface error prediction in flexible end milling system. ASME J Eng Ind 108:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Armarego EJA, Deshpande NP (1989) Computerized predictive cutting models for forces in end-milling including eccentricity effects. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 38(1):45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spiewak SA (1994) Analytical modeling of cutting point trajectories in milling. J Eng Indust 116(4):1601–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rao VS, Rao PVM (2005) Modelling of tooth trajectory and process geometry in peripheral milling of curved surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(6):617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li HZ, Li XP (2005) A numerical study of the effects of cutter runout on milling process geometry based on true tooth trajectory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(5–6):435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumanchik LM, Schmitz TL (2007) Improved analytical chip thickness model for milling. Precis Eng 31(3):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sai L, Bouzid W, Zghal A (2008) Chip thickness analysis for different tool motions: for adaptive feed rate. J Mater Process Technol 204(1-3):213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang X, Zhang J, Zhao WH (2016) A new method for cutting force prediction in peripheral milling of complex curved surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(1-4):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao T, Zhang W, Qiu K, Wan M (2006) Numerical simulation of machined surface topography and roughness in milling process. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(1):96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arizmendi M, Campa FJ, Fernández J, de Lacalle LL, Gil A, Bilbao E, Veiga F, Lamikiz A (2009) Model for surface topography prediction in peripheral milling considering tool vibration. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Desai KA, Agarwal PK, Rao PVM (2009) Process geometry modeling with cutter runout for milling of curved surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(12):1015–1028

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arizmendi M, Fernández J, Gil A, Veiga F (2010) Model for the prediction of heterogeneity bands in the topography of surfaces machined by peripheral milling considering tool runout. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(1):51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arizmendi M, Fernández J, Gil A, Veiga F (2010) Identification of tool parallel axis offset through the analysis of the topography of surfaces machined by peripheral milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(12):1097–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, González-Rojas H (2011) Influence of feed, eccentricity and helix angle on topography obtained in side milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(12):889–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, González-Rojas H (2013) Roughness variation caused by grinding errors of cutting edges in side milling. Mach Sci Technol 17(4):75–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krüger M, Denkena B (2013) Model-based identification of tool runout in end milling and estimation of surface roughness from measured cutting forces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(5-8):1067–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang L, Zheng GL, Shi YN, Yang RR (2017) Improved tooth trajectory model for prediction of milled surface geometry. Mach Sci Technol 21(2):175–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Zheng, G. & Yang, R. General characterization of peripheral milled surface geometry by feature element. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 4809–4825 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04474-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04474-8

Keywords

Navigation