Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of a process window with consideration of effective layer thickness in SLM process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective laser melting (SLM) process based on metallic powders has been broadly adopted for its higher accuracy. In the SLM process, the building of a process window is a fundamental work for fabricating a full-dense part for a new material. Single-track test (STT) has been widely used due to its simplicity. Due to the different environmental conditions of between STTs and a real fabrication, stable process parameters obtained from the STTs cannot ensure successful fabrication. To resolve the problem, this paper proposes a new method to build a process window based on multi-layered fabrication. From the comparison between existing and proposed method, it is concluded that the proposed method can stably build a process window for a hard-processed material and provide more information for a geometrically accurate fabrication and the surface quality of a fabricated part.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moon SK, Tan YE, Hwang JH, Yoon YJ (2015) Application of 3d printing technology for designing light-weight unmanned aerial vehicle wing structures. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-GT 1(3):223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Das S, Wohlert M, Beaman JJ, Bourell DL (1998) Producing metal parts with selective laser sintering/hot isostatic pressing. JOM 50(12):17–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vandenbroucke B, Kruth JP (2007) Selective laser melting of biocompatible metal for rapid manufacturing of medical parts. Rapid Prototyp J 13(4):196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lachmayer R, Kloppenburg G, Wolf AG (2015) Rapid prototyping of reflectors for vehicle lighting using laser activated remote. In Light-emitting diodes: materials, devices, and applications for solid State Lighting XIX SPIE: 938305

  5. Bean GE, Witkin DB, McLouth TD, Patel DN, Zaldivar RJ (2018) Effect of laser focus shift on surface quality and density of Inconel 718 parts produced via selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 22:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khorasani AM, Gibson I, Ghaderi AR (2018) Rheological characterization of process parameters influence on surface quality of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(9–12):3761–3775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma CL, Gu DD, Dai DH, Du L, Zhng H (2018) Development of interfacial stress during selective laser melting of TiC reinforced TiAl composites: influence of geometric feature of reinforcement. Mater Des 157:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jafari D, Wits WW (2018) The utilization of selective laser melting technology on heat transfer devices for thermal energy conversion applications: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 91:420–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yap CY, Chua CK, Dong ZL, Liu ZH, Zhang DQ, Loh LE, Sing SL (2015) Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):041101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shipley H, McDonnel D, Culleton M, Lupoi R, O’Donnell G, Trimble D (2018) Optimisation of process parameters to address fundamental challenges during selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manu 128:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clijsters S, Craeghs T, Buls S, Kempen K, Kruth JP (2014) In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5–8):1089–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn IH, Moon SK, Hwang JH, Guijun B (2017) Characteristic length of the solidified melt pool in selective laser melting process. Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):370–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kempen K, Thijs L, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth JP (2015) Processing AlSi10Mg by selective laser melting: parameter optimisation and material characterization. Mater Sci Technol 31(8):917–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gong HJ, Rafi K, Starr T, Stucker B (2013) The effects of processing parameters on defect regularity in Ti-6Al-4V parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. 24th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Aug, Austin, TX, USA, pp. 12–14

  15. Di W, Yang YQ, Su XB, Che YH (2011) Study on energy input and its influences on single-track, multi-track, and multi-layer in SLM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(9–12):1189–1199

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang DQ, Cai QH, Liu JH, He J, Li R (2012) Microstructural evolvement and formation of selective laser melting W–Ni–cu composite powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2233–2242

    Google Scholar 

  17. Song B, Dong SJ, Deng SH, Liao HL, Coddet C (2014) Microstructure and tensile properties of iron parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Opt Laser Technol 56:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li R, Shi YS, Liu JH, Xie Z, Wang ZG (2009) Selective laser melting W–10 wt.% Cu composite powders. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(5–8):597–605

    Google Scholar 

  19. Childs THC, Hauser C, Badrossamay M (2005) Selective laser sintering (melting) of stainless and tool steel powders: experiments and modelling. Inst Mech Eng B 219(4):339–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan M, Dicken P (2012) Selective laser melting (SLM) of gold (Au). Rapid Prototyp J 18(1):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM, Gallegos GF, Gibbs JW, Hahn DE, Kamath C, Rubenchik AM (2014) Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 214(12):2915–2925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spierings AB, Levy G (2009) Comparison of density of stainless steel 316L parts produced with selective laser melting using different powder grades. 19th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Aug, Austin, TX, USA pp. 342–353

  23. Li R, Liu JH, Shi YS, Wang L, Jiang W (2011) Balling behavior of stainless steel and nickel powder during selective laser melting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(9–12):1025–1035

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sun ZG, Tan XP, Tor SB, Yeong WY (2016) Selective laser melting of stainless steel 316L with low porosity and high build rates. Mater Des 104:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I, Bertrand P, Smurov I (2012) Factor analysis of selective laser melting process parameters and geometrical characteristics of synthesized single tracks. Rapid Prototyp J 18(3):201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan PP, Gu DD (2015) Molten pool behaviour and its physical mechanism during selective laser melting of TiC/AlSi10Mg nanocomposites: simulation and experiments. J Phys D Appl Phys 48(3):035303

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Fox JC, Moylan SP, Lane BM (2016) Effect of process parameters on the surface roughness of overhanging structures in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 45:131–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jamshidinia M, Kovacevic R (2015) The influence of heat accumulation on the surface roughness in powder-bed additive manufacturing. Surf Topogr 3(1):014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Son yong and his team in Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH) for their help in the fabrication of specimens.

Funding

This research was supported by the Tongmyong University Research Grants 2017A002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Il Hyuk Ahn.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, I. Determination of a process window with consideration of effective layer thickness in SLM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 4181–4191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04402-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04402-w

Keywords

Navigation