Advertisement

Investigation on the angular accuracy of selective laser melting

  • Luo Zhang
  • Shasha Zhang
  • Haihong ZhuEmail author
  • Guoqing Wang
  • Xiaoyan Zeng
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, theoretical models for prediction angular accuracy of selective laser melting with three depositing directions were proposed by considering the track width and the solidification shrinkage. The prediction of the angular absolute error of the angular structure was performed using these models. The results show that the angular fabricated by the SLM process is equal to the as-designed angular for the investigated three directions. Then, the experiments of SLMed Ti6Al4V angular structures were carried out to verify the theoretical models. The theoretical prediction and experimental results had good correspondence. The absolute error of angular concentrates on the scope of ± 0.75°. This fluctuation is caused by the bad surface quality which is resulted by the stair effect. Furthermore, the bad surface roughness enlarges the dimensional measurements of the angular structure. These results provide a guideline for improving the accuracy of SLM technology.

Keywords

Theoretical model Selective laser melting Angular structure Accuracy 

Notes

Funding information

This work is supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) under Grant No.613281.

References

  1. 1.
    Buchbinder D, Schleifenbaum H, Heidrich S, Meiners W, Bültmann J (2011) High power selective laser melting (HP SLM) of aluminum parts. Phys Procedia 12:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prashanth KG, Damodaram R, Maity T, Wang P, Eckert J (2017) Friction welding of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V parts. Mater Sci Eng A 704:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qi T, Zhu H, Zhang H, Yin J, Ke L, Zeng X (2017) Selective laser melting of Al7050 powder: melting mode transition and comparison of the characteristics between the keyhole and conduction mode. Mater Des 135:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dheyaa SJA-S, Masood SH, Faizan-Ur-Rab M, Alomarah A, Ponnusamy P (2018) Mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of functionally graded F2BCC lattice fabricated by SLM. Mater Des 144:32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han X, Zhu H, Nie X, Wang G, Zeng X (2018) Investigation on selective laser melting AlSi10Mg cellular lattice strut: molten pool morphology, surface roughness and dimensional accuracy. Materials 11:392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vora P, Mumtaz K, Todd I, Hopkinson N (2015) AlSi12 in-situ alloy formation and residual stress reduction usinganchorless selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 7:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calignano F, Cattano G, Manfredi D (2018) Manufacturing of thin wall structures in AlSi10Mg alloy by laser powder bed fusion through process parameters. J Mater Process Technol 255:773–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calignano F (2014) Design optimization of supports for overhanging structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting. Mater Des 64:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xiong J, Gu D, Chen H, Dai D, Shi Q (2017) Structural optimization of re-entrant negative Poisson’s ratio structure fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des 120:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han J, Wu M, Ge Y, Wu J (2018) Optimizing the structure accuracy by changing the scanning strategy using selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:4439–4447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghani SAC, Zakaria MH, Harun WSW, Zaulkafilai Z (2017) Dimensional accuracy of internal cooling channel made by selective laser melting (SLM) And direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) processes in fabrication of internally cooled cutting tools. MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Science 90:01058Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fotovvati, B., Wayne, S. F., Lewis, G., Asadi, E (2018) A review on melt-pool characteristics in laser welding of metals. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018(11):1–18Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fotovvati B, Namdari N, Dehghanghadikolaei A (2018) Fatigue performance of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V components: state of the art. Mater Res Expr 6(1):012002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riedlbauer D, Scharowsky T, Singer RF, Steinmann P, Körner C, Mergheim J (2017) Macroscopic simulation and experimental measurement of melt pool characteristics in selective electron beam melting of Ti-6Al-4 V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5-8):1309–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cherry JA, Davies HM, Mehmood S, Lavery NP, Brown SGR, Sienz J (2015) Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316 L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5-8):869–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhu H, Hu Z, Wang G, Zeng X (2018) Horizontal dimensional accuracy prediction of selective laser melting. Mater Des 160:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nie X, Zhang H, Zhu H, Hu Z, Ke L, Zeng X (2018) Analysis of processing parameters and characteristics of selective laser melted high strength Al-Cu-Mg alloys: from single tracks to cubic samples. J Mater Process Technol 256:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hu Z, Zhu H, Zhang H, Zeng X (2017) Experimental investigation on selective laser melting of 17-4PH stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol 87:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Calignano F, Manfredi D, Ambrosio EP, Iuliano L, Fino P (2013) Influence of process parameters on surface roughness of aluminum parts produced by DMLS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2743–2751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monroy K, Delgado J, Sereno L, Ciurana J (2015) Geometrical feature analysis of Co-Cr-Mo single tracks after selective laser melting processing. Rapid Prototyp J 21:287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luo Zhang
    • 1
  • Shasha Zhang
    • 1
  • Haihong Zhu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guoqing Wang
    • 2
  • Xiaoyan Zeng
    • 1
  1. 1.Wuhan National Laboratory for OptoelectronicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.China Academy of Launch Vehicle TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations