Advertisement

Experimental analysis of the flow drill screw driving process

  • Fadik Aslan
  • Laurent LangloisEmail author
  • Tudor Balan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

Flow drill screw (FDS) driving is a thermomechanical assembly process that allows for single-sided access multi-material joining, with a high application potential for modern lightweight vehicle design. The process combines three consecutive operations which partially overlap: flow drilling, thread forming, and tightening. The paper extensively investigates the process parameter effects on the flow drilling operation of thin sheet AA5182-O 2.5-mm thick and DP600 1.4-mm thick. Drilling defects have been associated with specific ranges of control parameters. Mechanical tests have shown that the drilling defects do not have a significant impact on the mechanical strength of the assembly under static loading. These results were used to determine both the optimal joining parameters and the robust process window. The variation of all process-relevant mechanical quantities was recorded over the whole available process window. This data may further serve for process simulation validation, or alternatively for the construction of data-driven meta-models.

Keywords

Flow drilling Aluminum alloy AHSS steel Joining by forming 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by IRT M2P (Institut de Recherche Technologique Matériaux, Métallurgie et Procédés), the French PIA (Plan d’Investissement d’Avenir), and a consortium of industrial partners through projects SAM and PIRAMID.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Martinsen K, Hu SJ, Carlson BE (2015) Joining of dissimilar materials. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64(2):679–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meschut G, Janzen V, Olfermann T (2014) Innovative and highly productive joining technologies for multi-material lightweight car body structures. J Mater Eng Perform 23(5):1515–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller SF, Blau PJ, Shih AJ (2005) Microstructural alterations associated with friction drilling of steel, aluminum, and titanium. J Mater Eng Perform 14(5):647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fromentin G, Bierla A, Minfray C, Poulachon G (2010) An experimental study on the effects of lubrication in form tapping. Tribol Int 43(9):1726–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urbikain G, Perez JM, López de Lacalle LN, Andueza A (2018) Combination of friction drilling and form tapping processes on dissimilar materials for making nutless joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 232(6):1007–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skovron JD, Prasad RR, Ulutan D, Bo B, Paolini D, Mears L, Claus L, Detwiler D (2015) Effect of thermal assistance on the joint quality of Al6063-T5A during flow drill screwdriving. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(5):051019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Streppel AH, Kals HJJ (1983) Flowdrilling : a preliminary analysis of a new bush-making operation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 32(1):167–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zimmer S, Langlois L, Laye J, Bigot R (2010) Experimental investigation of the influence of the FSW plunge processing parameters on the maximum generated force and torque. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(1-4):201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markov OE, Perig EV, Markova MA, Zlygoriev VN (2016) Development of a new process for forging plates using intensive plastic deformation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9-12):2159–2174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller SF, Tao J, Shih AJ (2006) Friction drilling of cast metals. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(12–13):1526–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee SM, Chow HM, Huang FY, Yan BH (2009) Friction drilling of austenitic stainless steel by uncoated and PVD AlCrN- and TiAlN-coated tungsten carbide tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(1):81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller SF, Li R, Wang H, Shih AJ (2006) Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Friction Drilling Process. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(3):802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qu J, Blau PJ (2008) A new model to calculate friction coefficients and shear stresses in thermal drilling. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(1):014502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skovron J, Mears L, Ulutan D, Baeumler B, Paolini D, Claus L, Detwiler D (2014) Characterization of flow drill screwdriving process parameters on joint quality. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 8(1):35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chow HM, Lee SM, Yang LD (2008) Machining characteristic study of friction drilling on AISI 304 stainless steel. JMPT 207(1–3):180–186Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sønstabø JK, Holmstrom PH, Morin D, Langseth M (2015) Macroscopic strength and failure properties of flow-drill screw connections. J Mater Process Technol 222:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kerkhofsa M, Van Stappena M, Quaeyhaegensb C, Stals LM (1994) The performance of ( Ti , A1 ) N-coated flowdrills. Surf Coat Technol 68(1):741–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grossberndt, Hermann, Gunter Kretschmer, and Horst Klees. (1993) Hole forming and selftapping screw. U.S. Patent No. 5,234,301. 10 Aug. 1993Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aslan F, Langlois L, Mangin P, Balan T (2018) Identification of drilling parameters during the flow drill screw driving process. Key Eng Mater 767:465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Szlosarek R, Karall T, No E, Hahne C, Meyer N (2013) Mechanical testing of flow drill screw joints between fibre-reinforced plastics and metals. Mater Test 55(10):737–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jawahir IS, Oxley PLB (1988) The tool restricted contact effect as a major influencing factor in chip breaking: an experimental analysis. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 37(1):121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim TH, Yum J, Hu SJ, Spicer JP, Abell JA (2011) Process robustness of single lap ultrasonic welding of thin, dissimilar materials. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sønstabø JK, Morin D, Langseth M (2018) Testing and modelling of flow-drill screw connections under quasi-static loadings. J Mater Process Technol 255(7491):724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arts et Métiers ParisTech LCFCIRT-M2P and Université de LorraineMetzFrance
  2. 2.Arts et Métiers ParisTech LCFCUniversité de LorraineMetzFrance

Personalised recommendations