Abstract
Inconel 625 is a Ni-based superalloy widely used in nuclear and aerospace applications because of its high strength and corrosion resistance. The current paper investigates selective laser melting of Inconel 625 using a wide range of process parameters: four laser powers, five scan speeds, and three hatch spacings. Cube coupons are produced and their end properties are measured, specifically, relative density, surface roughness, microhardness, and surface residual stresses. Process maps are constructed to correlate processing parameters to the part surface integrity, and the possible underlying causes are highlighted. Experimental results show that highly dense parts can be produced using selective laser melting and low average surface roughness can be obtained in both the scan and hatch directions. Hatch spacing is the most prominent factor to attain relative densities above 99% while high laser powers are key to lower the average surface roughness. Microhardness and microstructure examination are done for a subset of the process parameters and found to not significantly change with laser power. Surface residual stresses are measured on the top surface in the scan and hatch directions and process maps are developed. There is no particular parameter that solely affects surface residual stresses, despite several cases where the increase in laser power reduced the surface residual stresses. 90% of measurements showed surface tensile residual stresses except for a few cases that resulted in surface compressive residual stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AM:
-
Additive manufacturing
- EDS:
-
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
- FE:
-
Finite element
- HIP:
-
Hot isostatic pressing
- PSD:
-
Particle size distribution
- RS:
-
Residual stress
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
- SLM:
-
Selective laser melting
- E d :
-
Volumetric energy density (J/mm3)
- E :
-
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
- P :
-
Laser power (W)
- T :
-
Temperature (0K)
- h :
-
Hatch spacing (mm)
- t :
-
Layer thickness (mm)
- v :
-
Scan speed (mm/s)
- α :
-
Coefficient of thermal expansion (0K -1)
- ρ :
-
Density (kg/m3)
- σ th :
-
Thermal stresses (MPa)
- τ s :
-
Molten droplet solidification time (s)
References
I. ASTM, “ASTM52900-15 (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing–general principles–terminology. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
Gu D, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R (2012) Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev 57:133–164
Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928
B. Cheng, S. Shrestha, and Y. K. Chou, “Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in selective laser melting,” in ASME 2016 11th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, 2016, pp. V003T08A009-V003T08A009
Koutiri I, Pessard E, Peyre P, Amlou O, De Terris T (2018) Influence of SLM process parameters on the surface finish, porosity rate and fatigue behavior of as-built Inconel 625 parts. J Mater Process Technol 255:536–546
Marchese G, Garmendia Colera X, Calignano F, Lorusso M, Biamino S, Minetola P, Manfredi D (2017) Characterization and comparison of Inconel 625 processed by selective laser melting and laser metal deposition. Adv Eng Mater 19
Dinda G, Dasgupta A, Mazumder J (2009) Laser aided direct metal deposition of Inconel 625 superalloy: microstructural evolution and thermal stability. Mater Sci Eng A 509:98–104
Ezugwu E, Wang Z, Machado A (1999) The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J Mater Process Technol 86:1–16
Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B, Moylan S, Donmez A, Özel T (2017) Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:22–36
Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B, Moylan S, Donmez A, Özel T (2017) Predictive modeling and optimization of multi-track processing for laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625. Additive Manufacturing 13:14–36
Arısoy YM, Criales LE, Özel T, Lane B, Moylan S, Donmez A (2017) Influence of scan strategy and process parameters on microstructure and its optimization in additively manufactured nickel alloy 625 via laser powder bed fusion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:1393–1417
Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Özel T (2016) Sensitivity analysis of material and process parameters in finite element modeling of selective laser melting of Inconel 625. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:2653–2666
M. A. Anam, D. Pal, and B. Stucker, 2013“Modeling and experimental validation of nickel-based super alloy (Inconel 625) made using selective laser melting,” in Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX,, pp. 12–14
M. A. Anam, J. Dilip, D. Pal, and B. Stucker,2014 “Effect of scan pattern on the microstructural evolution of Inconel 625 during selective laser melting,” in Proceedings of 25th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium,
Carter LN, Wang X, Read N, Khan R, Aristizabal M, Essa K et al (2016) Process optimisation of selective laser melting using energy density model for nickel based superalloys. Mater Sci Technol 32:657–661
Beuth J, Klingbeil N (2001) The role of process variables in laser-based direct metal solid freeform fabrication. Jom 53:36–39
C. Montgomery, J. Beuth, L. Sheridan, and N. Klingbeil,2015 Process mapping of Inconel 625 in laser powder bed additive manufacturing, in Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, , pp. 1195–1204
Amato K, Hernandez J, Murr L, Martinez E, Gaytan S, Shindo P et al (2012) Comparison of microstructures and properties for a Ni-base superalloy (alloy 625) fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mater Sci Res 1:3
Li S, Wei Q, Shi Y, Zhu Z, Zhang D (2015) Microstructure characteristics of Inconel 625 superalloy manufactured by selective laser melting. J Mater Sci Technol 31:946–952
Li C, White R, Fang X, Weaver M, Guo Y (2017) Microstructure evolution characteristics of Inconel 625 alloy from selective laser melting to heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 705:20–31
Mumtaz K, Hopkinson N (2009) Top surface and side roughness of Inconel 625 parts processed using selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 15:96–103
S. Raghavan, S. Chen-Nan, Z. Baicheng, S. W. Jack, P. Wang, N. M. L. Sharon, et al., 2015 Mechanical properties and microstructures of as printed and heat treated samples of selective laser melted IN625 alloy powder, in MATEC Web of Conferences,
D. B. Witkin, P. Adams, and T. Albright, 2015Microstructural evolution and mechanical behavior of nickel-based superalloy 625 made by selective laser melting,” in Laser 3D Manufacturing II, , p. 93530B
Hack H, Link R, Knudsen E, Baker B, Olig S (2017) Mechanical properties of additive manufactured nickel alloy 625. Additive Manufacturing 14:105–115
Kreitcberg A, Brailovski V, Turenne S (2017) Elevated temperature mechanical behavior of IN625 alloy processed by laser powder-bed fusion. Mater Sci Eng A 700:540–553
K. Alena, B. Vladimir, T. Sylvain, C. Cyrille, and U. Victor,2017 Influence of thermo-and HIP treatments on the microstructure and mechanical properties of IN625 alloy parts produced by selective laser melting: a comparative study, in Mater Sci Forum,
Witkin DB, Albright TV, Patel DN (2016) Empirical approach to understanding the fatigue behavior of metals made using additive manufacturing. Metall Mater Trans A 47:3823–3836
Bass L, Milner J, Gnäupel-Herold T, Moylan S (2018) Residual stress in additive manufactured nickel alloy 625 parts. J Manuf Sci Eng 140:061004
Slotwinski JA, Garboczi E, Stutzman PE, Ferraris CF, Watson SS, Peltz MA (2014) Characterization of metal powders used for additive manufacturing. J Res Natl Instit Standards Technol 119:460–494
Sutton AT, Kriewall CS, Leu MC, Newkirk JW (2017) Powder characterisation techniques and effects of powder characteristics on part properties in powder-bed fusion processes. Virtual and Physical Prototyping 12:3–29
Spierings AB, Schneider M, Eggenberger R (2011) Comparison of density measurement techniques for additive manufactured metallic parts. Rapid Prototyp J 17:380–386
“ASTM D7127-17,2017 Standard test method for measurement of surface roughness of abrasive blast cleaned metal surfaces using a portable stylus instrument,” ed: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA,
Schajer GS (2013) Practical residual stress measurement methods. John Wiley & Sons
Simson T, Emmel A, Dwars A, Böhm J (2017) Residual stress measurements on AISI 316L samples manufactured by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 17:183–189
Aboulkhair NT, Everitt NM, Ashcroft I, Tuck C (2014) Reducing porosity in AlSi10Mg parts processed by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 1:77–86
Yang T, Liu T, Liao W, MacDonald E, Wei H, Chen X, Jiang L (2019) The influence of process parameters on vertical surface roughness of the AlSi10Mg parts fabricated by selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol 266:26–36
Maamoun A, Xue Y, Elbestawi M, Veldhuis S (2018) Effect of selective laser melting process parameters on the quality of Al alloy parts: powder characterization, density, surface roughness, and dimensional accuracy. Materials 11:2343
Gao F, Sonin AA (1994) Precise deposition of molten microdrops: the physics of digital microfabrication. Proc R Soc Lond A 444:533–554
McNallan M, Debroy T (1991) Effect of temperature and composition on surface tension in Fe-Ni-Cr alloys containing sulfur. Metall Trans B 22:557–560
Brooks R, Monaghan B, Barnicoat A, McCabe A, Mills K, Quested P (1996) The physical properties of alloys in the liquid and “mushy” states. Int J Thermophys 17:1151–1161
Calignano F, Manfredi D, Ambrosio E, Iuliano L, Fino P (2013) Influence of process parameters on surface roughness of aluminum parts produced by DMLS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2743–2751
Gunenthiram V, Peyre P, Schneider M, Dal M, Coste F, Fabbro R (2017) Analysis of laser–melt pool–powder bed interaction during the selective laser melting of a stainless steel. Journal of Laser Applications 29:022303
P. C. Sharma,1999 A textbook of production enginerring S. Chand Publishing,
Mercelis P, Kruth J-P (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12:254–265
Kruth J-P, Deckers J, Yasa E, Wauthlé R (2012) Assessing and comparing influencing factors of residual stresses in selective laser melting using a novel analysis method. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226:980–991
Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang D (2016) A study on the residual stress during selective laser melting (SLM) of metallic powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:647–656
Staub A, Spierings AB, Wegener K (2018) Correlation of meltpool characteristics and residual stresses at high laser intensity for metal lpbf process. Adv Mater Process Technol:1–9
Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I (2015) Evaluation of residual stress in stainless steel 316L and Ti6Al4V samples produced by selective laser melting. Virtual and Physical Prototyping 10:67–76
Parry L, Ashcroft I, Wildman R (2019) Geometrical effects on residual stress in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 25:166–175
Yakout M, Elbestawi M, Veldhuis SC (2019) Density and mechanical properties in selective laser melting of invar 36 and stainless steel 316L. J Mater Process Technol 266:397–420
Withers PJ, Bhadeshia H (2001) Residual stress. Part 1–measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 17:355–365
Yakout M, Cadamuro A, Elbestawi M, Veldhuis SC (2017) The selection of process parameters in additive manufacturing for aerospace alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:2081–2098
Prashanth K, Scudino S, Maity T, Das J, Eckert J (2017) Is the energy density a reliable parameter for materials synthesis by selective laser melting? Mater Res Lett 5:386–390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balbaa, M.A., Elbestawi, M.A. & McIsaac, J. An experimental investigation of surface integrity in selective laser melting of Inconel 625. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 3511–3529 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03949-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03949-y