Skip to main content
Log in

Using pre-processing and indenting of contact interface to improve fixture clamping efficiency

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study is to increase load capacity of interface contact between workpiece and machining fixture. Proposed methodology is based on pre-processing of contact interfaces and indenting the clamping elements into the workpiece. The pre-processing of workpiece/fixture contact interfaces is performed by microcutting. Applicability of the proposed clamping method has been verified by analysis, simulation, and experiment. Comparative analysis was performed for a conventional design of a clamping element with flat head, and a specially designed clamping element with ring-shaped head. In addition, clamping elements were comparatively analyzed regarding the different depths of the pre-established workpiece/fixture contact interface, i.e., for the different values of clamping forces as the result of contact interface pre-processing. Based on the results, it can be concluded that special clamping elements based on pre-processing and indenting of contact interface provide higher load capacity and lower contact interface compliance compared to their conventional counterparts, which are prevalent in today’s industrial practice. In addition, the proposed method uses lower clamping forces to achieve deeper indenting and higher tangential load capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang X, Song F, Wang Y, Lan G (2017) A method for determining the degree of freedom of workpiece based on developed geometry theorem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:4553–4560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0487-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tadic B, Bogdanovic B, Jeremic B, Todorovic P, Luzanin O, Budak I, Vukelic D (2013) Locating and clamping of complex geometry workpieces with skewed holes in multiple-constraint conditions. Assem Autom 33:386–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-09-2012-074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang Y, Rong Y, Yang JC (2003) Computer-aided fixture design verification. Part 2. Tolerance analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:836–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1400-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asante JN (2013) A constraint-based tolerance analysis in a multi-operation single setup and multi-operation multi-setup part-fixture assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4891-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalo O, Seara JM, Guruceta E, Izpizua A, Esparta M, Zamakona I, Uterga N, Aranburu A, Thoelen J (2017) A method to minimize the workpiece deformation using a concept of intelligent fixture. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 48:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matejic M, Tadic B, Lazarevic M, Misic M, Vukelic D (2018) Modelling and simulation of a novel modular fixture for flexible manufacturing system. Int J Simul Model 17:18–29. https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM17(1)407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng PF, Yu DW, Wu ZJ, Uhlmann E (2008) Jaw-chuck stiffness and its influence on dynamic clamping force during high-speed turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1268–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmud A, Mayer JRR, Baron L (2015) Determining the minimum clamping force by cutting force simulation in aerospace fuselage pocket machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:1751–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7104-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerr DR, Hartley DM (2006) Invariant measures of closeness to linear dependency of screw systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Eng Mech Eng Sci 220:1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062C17204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parvaz H, Nategh MJ (2013) A pilot framework developed as a common platform integrating diverse elements of computer aided fixture design. Int J Prod Res 51:6720–6732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.832000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin G, Zhang W (2007) Modeling and analysis of workpiece stability based on the linear programming method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:78–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0315-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meshreki M, Attia H, Kovecses J (2011) A new analytical formulation for the dynamics of multipocket thin-walled structures considering the fixture constraints. J Manuf Sci Eng 133:021014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu SW, Ding GF, Ma SW, Yan KY, Qin SF (2013) Workpiece locating error prediction and compensation in fixtures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4578-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng G, Hou X, Wu C, Jin T, Zhang X (2010) Fast collision detection approach to facilitate interactive modular fixture assembly design in a virtual environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:315–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2073-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng G, Chen G, Wu C, Xin H, Jiang Y (2011) Applying RBR and CBR to develop a VR based integrated system for machining fixture design. Expert Syst Appl 38:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mervyn F, Senthil Kumar A, Bok SH, Nee AYC (2003) Development of an Internet enabled interactive fixture design system. Comput Aided Des 35:945–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00009-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng Y, Rong Y, Hou Z (2008) The study of fixture stiffness. Part I: a finite element analysis for stiffness of fixture units. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:865–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0908-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng Y, Rong Y, Hou Z (2008) The study of fixture stiffness. Part II: contact stiffness identification between fixture components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1077-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ivanov V, Mital D, Karpus V, Dehtiarov I, Zajac J, Pavlenko I, Hatala M (2017) Numerical simulation of the system “fixture–workpiece” for lever machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9701-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vasundara M, Padmanaban KP (2014) Recent developments on machining fixture layout design, analysis, and optimization using finite element method and evolutionary techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5249-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaya N (2006) Machining fixture locating and clamping position optimization using genetic algorithms. Comput Ind 57:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen C, Sun Y, Ni J (2018) Optimization of flexible fixture layout using N-M principle. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:4303–4311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1907-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hajimiri H, Abedini V, Shakeri M, Siahmargoei MH (2018) Simultaneous fixturing layout and sequence optimization based on genetic algorithm and finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:3191–3204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1706-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cai-qi H, Zhong-qin L, Xin-min L (2006) Concept design of checking fixture for auto-body parts based on neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30:574–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0039-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deng H, Melkote SN (2006) Determination of minimum clamping forces for dynamically stable fixturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:847–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Padmanaban KP, Arulshri KP, Prabhakaran G (2009) Machining fixture layout design using ant colony algorithm based continuous optimization method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:922–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamedi M (2005) Intelligent fixture design through a hybrid system of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Artif Intell Rev 23:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-004-7187-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prabhakaran G, Padmanaban KP, Krishnakumar R (2007) Machining fixture layout optimization using FEM and evolutionary techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1090–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0441-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Padmanaban KP, Prabhaharan G (2008) Dynamic analysis on optimal placement of fixturing elements using evolutionary techniques. Int J Prod Res 46:4177–4214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601147297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Wan XJ, Xiong CH, Wang XF, Zhang XM, Xiong YL (2010) A machining-feature-driven approach to locating scheme in multi-axis milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Subramaniam V, Senthil Kumar A, Seow KC (2001) A multi-agent approach to fixture design. J Intell Manuf 12:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008947413133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li T, Wang Y, Liu K, Liu H, Zhang J, Sheng X, Guo D (2018) Virtual grid and BPNN based collision avoidance control of automatic fixture system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:2843–2853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1432-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bai X, Hu F, He G, Ding B (2015) A memetic algorithm for multi-objective fixture layout optimization. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Eng Mech Eng Sci 229:3047–3058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406214565802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Y, Chen X, Liu Q, Gindy N (2006) Optimisation of machining fixture layout under multi-constraints. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1291–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Boyle I, Rong Y, Brown DC (2011) A review and analysis of current computer-aided fixture design approaches. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang H, Rong YK, Li H, Shaun P (2010) Computer aided fixture design: recent research and trends. Comput Aided Des 42:1085–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tadic B, Jeremic B, Todorovic P, Vukelic D, Proso U, Mandic V, Budak I (2012) Efficient workpiece clamping by indenting cone-shaped elements. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13:1725–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0227-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vukelic D, Tadic B, Budak I, Miljanic D, Jeremic B, Todorovic P, Randjelovic S (2012) Novel fixture clamping method for increased machining performance. Teh Vjesn 19:837–846

    Google Scholar 

  39. Todorovic P, Buchmeister B, Djapan M, Vukelic D, Milosevic M, Tadic B, Radenkovic M (2014) Comparative model analysis of two types of clamping elements in dynamic conditions. Teh Vjesn 21:1273–1279

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tadic B, Vukelic D, Miljanic D, Bogdanovic B, Macuzic I, Budak I, Todorovic P (2014) Model testing of fixture-workpiece interface compliance in dynamic conditions. J Manuf Syst 33:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Todorovic P, Vukelic D, Tadic B, Veljkovic D, Budak I, Macuzic I, Lalic B (2014) Modelling of dynamic compliance of fixture/workpiece interface. Int J Simul Model 13:54–65. https://doi.org/10.2507/ijsimm13(1)5.254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tadic B, Todorovic P, Novkinic B, Buchmeister B, Radenkovic M, Budak I, Vukelic D (2015) Fixture layout design based on a single-surface clamping with local deformation. Int J Simul Model 14:379–391. https://doi.org/10.2507/ijsimm14(3)1.280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Deng T, Li D, Li X, Jin C, Ding P (2015) Study on the clamping capacity of profile jaws based on finite element analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1847–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6741-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Asante JN (2010) Effect of fixture compliance and cutting conditions on workpiece stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2284-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Raghu A, Melkote SN (2005) Modeling of workpiece location error due to fixture geometric error and fixture-workpiece compliance. J Manuf Sci Eng 127:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1828052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vishnupriyan S (2012) Effect of system compliance and workpiece dynamics on machining error. Assem Autom 32:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445151211212325

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Djordje Vukelic.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vukelic, D., Tadic, B., Bogdanovic, B. et al. Using pre-processing and indenting of contact interface to improve fixture clamping efficiency. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 179–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03845-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03845-5

Keywords

Navigation