Skip to main content

A design framework for additive manufacturing

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is one of the fastest growing and most promising manufacturing technologies, offering significant advantages over conventional manufacturing processes. That is, the geometrical flexibility that leads to increased design freedom is not infinite as the numerous AM processes impose manufacturing limitations. Abiding by these manufacturability rules implies a backpropagation of AM knowledge to all design phases for a successful build. A catholic AM-driven design framework is needed to ensure full exploitation of the AM design capabilities. The current framework is based on the definition of the CAD aspects and the AM process parameters. Their dependence, affection to the resulted part, and weight on the total process determine the outcome. The AM-driven design framework prevents manufacturing issues of certain geometries, that can be effortlessly created by conventional manufacturing, and additionally exploits the full design-freedom potentials AM has to offer with a linear design flow reducing design iterations and ultimately achieving first time right AM design process.

References

  1. 1.

    Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2015) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zaman UK, Rivette M, Siadat A, Mousavi SM (2018) Integrated product-process design: material and manufacturing process selection for additive manufacturing using multi-criteria decision making. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 51:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bikas H, Stavridis J, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) A design framework to replace conventional manufacturing processes with additive manufacturing for structural components: a formula student case study, 49th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (CIRP-CMS 2016), vol 57, pp 710–715, 25–27 May, Stuttgart, Germany

  4. 4.

    Pradel P, Zhu Z, Bibb R, Moultrie J (2018) A framework for mapping design for additive manufacturing knowledge for industrial and product design. J Eng Des 29(6):291–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1483011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yang S, Zhao YF (2015) Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1–4):327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Spiegel G, Wright WB (2016) IV. Slicing. https://medium.com/3d-printing-in-o-p/iv-slicing-72a9515f44bc. Accessed 04/12/2018

  7. 7.

    Moylan S, Whitenton E, Lane B, Slotwinski J (2014) Infrared thermography for laser-based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4864956

  8. 8.

    Renishaw (2017) Design for Metal AM by Renishaw – a beginner’s guide. https://www.renishaw.com/en/design-for-metal-am-a-beginners-guide%2D%2D42652. Accessed 04/12/2018

  9. 9.

    Zelinski P (2018) 5 Lessons about additive manufacturing we can learn from this part. https://www.additivemanufacturing.media/blog/post/5-lessons-about-additive-manufacturing-we-can-learn-from-this-part-. Accessed 04/12/2018

  10. 10.

    Renishaw article. Additive manufacturing and the need for supports. https://www.renishaw.com/en/can-you-build-am-parts-without-supports%2D%2D42173. Accessed 04/12/2018

  11. 11.

    Nassar AR, Reutzel EW Beyond layer-by-layer additive manufacturing – voxel-wise directed energy deposition. Applied Research Laboratory at the Pennsylvania State University, University Park

  12. 12.

    Jiang J, Stringer J, Xu X, Zhong RY (2018) Investigation of printable threshold overhang angle in extrusion-based additive manufacturing for reducing support waste. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 31(10):961–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2018.1466398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Allaire G, Dapogny C, Estevez R, Faure A, Michailidis G (2017) Structural optimization under overhang constraints imposed by additive manufacturing technologies. J Comput Phys 351:295–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.09.041

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Redwood B, Schöffer F, Garret B (2017) The 3D printing handbook: technologies, design and applications. 3D Hubs

  15. 15.

    Jiang J, Xu X, Stringer J (2018) Support structures for additive manufacturing: a review. J Manuf Mater Process 2(4):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp2040064

  16. 16.

    Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Ablat MA (2017) Design consideration for additive manufacturing: fused deposition modelling. Open Journal of Applied Sciences 07:291–318. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2017.76024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yang F, Tang Y, Zhao YF (2016) Manufacturability of overhang structures fabricated by binder jetting process. Vol 2: Advanced Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2016-65927

  18. 18.

    Utley E (2017) An Introduction to designing for metal 3D printing. https://blogs.solidworks.com/solidworksblog/2017/06/introduction-designing-metal-3d-printing.html. Accessed 27/11/2018

  19. 19.

    Thomas D (2009) The development of design rules for selective laser melting. University of Wales, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chain P Supports in 3D printing: a technology overview, 3D hubs, https://www.3dhubs.com/knowledge-base/supports-3d-printing-technology-overview#binder-jetting. Accessed 19/12/2018

  21. 21.

    Cloots M, Zumofen L, Spierings AB, Kirchheim A, Wegener K (2017) Approaches to minimize overhang angles of SLM parts. Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2015-0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bartolo PJS, et al (2013) High value manufacturing: advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping. 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal, 1–5 October 2013, p 63

  23. 23.

    Shinde MS, Ashtankar KM (2017) Additive manufacturing–assisted conformal cooling channels in mold manufacturing processes. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017699764.

  24. 24.

    Lemay M (2018) Design for additive manufacturing: (1) internal channels, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/design-additive-manufacturing-1-internal-channels-matt-lemay/. Accessed 05/12/2018

  25. 25.

    Pietropaoli M, Ahlfeld R, Montomoli F, Ciani A, D’Ercole M (2017) Design for additive manufacturing: internal channel optimization. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 139(10):102101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Beyer C, Figueroa D (2016) Design and analysis of lattice structures for additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 138(12):121014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Valmik B, Prakash K, Vinaykumar P, Shreyans K, Kiran G, Rajkumar S (2014) A review on powder bed fusion technology of metal additive manufacturing. 4th International conference and exhibition on Additive Manufacturing Technologies-AM-2014, Septeber 1 &2 ,2014, Banglore, India

  28. 28.

    Horne R (2015) Advanced perimeter tuning. https://richrap.blogspot.com/2015/01/slic3r-advanced-perimeter-tuning-3d.html. Accessed 04/12/2018

  29. 29.

    Yang L, Gong H, Dilip S, Stucker B (2014) An investigation of thin feature generation in direct metal laser sintering systems. Conference: 25th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium

  30. 30.

    Seepersad CC, Govett T, Kim K, Lundin M, Pinero D (2012) A designer’s guide for dimensioning and tolerancing SLS parts. Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference

  31. 31.

    Kubiak S (2017) Guidelines for wall thickness in laser sintering. https://www.additivemanufacturing.media/blog/post/guidelines-for-wall-thickness-in-laser-sintering. Accessed 04/12/2018

  32. 32.

    Hoffmann P. Laboratory for advanced materials processing, https://www.swissmem.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Swissmem/Veranstaltungen/2017/Zerspann/PPT_DE/15_Additive_Manufacturing_Dr._Patrik_Hoffmann_.pdf. Accessed 27/11/2018

  33. 33.

    Papacharalampopoulos A, Stavropoulos P, Bikas H (2017) Path planning for filling 3D printed parts utilizing Hilbert curves, 15th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, (GCSM), vol 21, pp 757–764, 25–27 September, Haifa, Israel

  34. 34.

    Vyatskikh A, Delalande S, Kudo A, Zhang X, Portela CM, Greer JR (2018) Additive manufacturing of 3D nano-architected metals. Nat Commun 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03071-9

  35. 35.

    Komineas G, Foteinopoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A, Stavropoulos P (2018) Build time estimation models in thermal extrusion additive manufacturing processes. Procedia Manufacturing 21:647–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.167

  36. 36.

    Kechagias J, Zannis S, Chryssolouris G (1999) Surface roughness modelling of the Helisys laminated object manufacturing (LOM) process, 8th European Conference on Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing, Nottingham, U.K, pp 141–152

  37. 37.

    Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2012) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1721–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dongdong G (2015) Laser additive manufacturing of high-performance materials, pp 15–17, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46089-4

  39. 39.

    Sikder S, Barari A, Kishawy HA (2014) Effect of adaptive slicing on surface integrity in additive manufacturing. Volume 1A: 34th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2014-35559

  40. 40.

    Das P, Chandran R, Samant R, Anand S (2015) Optimum part build orientation in additive manufacturing for minimizing part errors and support structures. Procedia Manufacturing 1:343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.041

  41. 41.

    Buchanan C, Matilainen VP, Salminen A, Gardner L (2017) Structural performance of additive manufactured metallic material and cross-sections. J Constr Steel Res 136:35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang P, Liu J, To AC (2017) Role of anisotropic properties on topology optimization of additive manufactured load bearing structures. Scr Mater 135:148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.021

  43. 43.

    Chryssolouris G, Kechagias J, Moustakas P, Koutras P. (2003) An experimental investigation of the tensile strength of parts produced by laminated object manufacturing (LOM) process. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Systems (In Proceedings of the 34th CIRP International Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, Athens, GR, 11/2001, pp 319–322). 32

  44. 44.

    Saunders S (2017) EBM vs DMLS 3D printing: which method and surface texture is best for titanium 3D printed implants, https://3dprint.com/179579/ebm-dmls-3d-printed-implants/. Accessed 19/12/2018

  45. 45.

    Oswald C. Additive manufacturing design considerations for production in aerospace. http://app.emarketeer.com/resources/12517/My_Documents/AddManufacturingDesignPart1-LAI-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 27/11/2018

  46. 46.

    Mukherjee T, Wei HL, De A, DebRoy T (2018) Heat and fluid flow in additive manufacturing – part II: powder bed fusion of stainless steel, and titanium, nickel and aluminum base alloys. Comput Mater Sci 150:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mukherjee T, Zuback JS, Zhang W, DebRoy T (2018) Residual stresses and distortion in additively manufactured compositionally graded and dissimilar joints. Comput Mater Sci 143:325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.11.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Materialize article. AM simulation: a guide to the best part orientation and support configuration. https://www.materialise.com/en/cases/am-simulation-best-part-orientation-support-configuration-cmf-implants. Accessed 04/12/2018

  49. 49.

    Wright S (2015) 3D printing titanium: learning to learn from success. https://medium.com/3d-printing-stories/3d-printing-titanium-learning-to-learn-from-success-9d14921c48e2. Accessed 27/11/2018

Download references

Funding

The research leading to this paper has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, under the AMable (AdditiveManufacturABLE) project, grant agreement no 768775.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Stavropoulos.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bikas, H., Lianos, A.K. & Stavropoulos, P. A design framework for additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103, 3769–3783 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03627-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Additive manufacturing
  • Design for AM
  • AM design framework
  • Manufacturability
  • Design aspects
  • Design considerations