Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Data-driven smart production line and its common factors

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the wide usage of digital devices and easy access to the edge items in manufacturing industry, massive industrial data is generated and collected. A data-driven smart production line (SPL), which is a basic cell in a smart factory, is derived primarily. This paper studies the data-driven SPL and its common factors. Firstly, common factors such as integration, data-driven, service collaboration, and proactive service of SPL are investigated. Then, a data-driven method including data self-perception, data understanding, decision-making, and precise control for implementing SPL is proposed. As a reference, the research of the common factors and the data-driven method could offer a systematic standard for both academia and industry. Moreover, in order to validate this method, this paper presents an industrial case by taking an energy consumption forecast and fault diagnosis based on energy consumption data in a prototype of LED epoxy molding compound (EMC) production lines for example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhang L, Nee AYC (2017) Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends. J Intell Manuf 28(5):1079–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucke D, Constantinescu C, Westkämper E (2008) Smart factory - a step towards the next generation of manufacturing. In: Manufacturing Systems & Technologies for the New Frontier, pp 115–118

  3. Zuehlke D (2010) SmartFactory—towards a factory-of-things. Annu Rev Control 34(1):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang XV, Xu XW (2015) A collaborative product data exchange environment based on STEP. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhong RY, Dai QY, Qu T, Hu GJ, Huang GQ (2013) RFID-enabled real-time manufacturing execution system for mass-customization production. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(2):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tao F, Cheng Y, Xu LD, Zhang L, Li BH (2014) CCIoT-CMfg: cloud computing and Internet of Things-based cloud manufacturing service system. IEEE T Ind Inform 10(2):1435–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mejjaouli S, Babiceanu RF (2015) RFID-wireless sensor networks integration: decision models and optimization of logistics systems operations. J Manuf Syst 35:234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu S, Xu C, Zhong RY, Wang L (2017) A RFID-enabled positioning system in automated guided vehicle for smart factories. J Manuf Syst 44:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Babiceanu RF, Seker R (2016) Big data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: a survey of the current status and future outlook. Comput Ind 81:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kusiak A (2017) Smart manufacturing must embrace big data. Nature 544(7648):23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuo YH, Kusiak A (2018) From data to big data in production research: the past and future trends. Int J Prod Res 11:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang S, Wan J, Zhang D, Li D, Zhang C (2016) Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput Netw 101:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhong RY, Xu C, Chen C, Huang GQ (2017) Big data analytics for physical internet-based intelligent manufacturing shopfloors. Int J Prod Res 55(9):2610–2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A, Kusiak A (2018) Data-driven smart manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 48:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kezunovic M (2011) Translational knowledge: from collecting data to making decisions in a smart grid. Proc IEEE 99(6):977–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rusu LI, Rahayu W, Torabi T, Puersch F, Coronado W, Harris AT, Reed K (2012) Moving towards a collaborative decision support system for aeronautical data. J Intell Manuf 23(6):2085–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tao F, Zhang M (2017) Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. IEEE Access 5:20418–20427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chien CF, Hsu CY, Hsiao CW (2012) Manufacturing intelligence to forecast and reduce semiconductor cycle time. J Intell Manuf 23(6):2281–2294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q, Zhang M, Zhang H, Sui F (2017) Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):3563–3576

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tao F, Qi Q (2017) New IT driven service-oriented smart manufacturing: framework and characteristics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern -Syst 49:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2017.2723764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Djurdjanovic D, Mears L, Niaki FA, Haq AU, Li L (2017) State of the art review on process, system, and operations control in modern manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(6):061010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeong W, Ko H, Lim H et al (2013) A protocol for processing interfered data in facility sensor networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2377–2385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cao W, Jiang P, Lu P, Liu B, Jiang K (2017) Real-time data-driven monitoring in job-shop floor based on radio frequency identification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5–8):2099–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q (2018) IIHub: an industrial Internet-of-Things hub towards smart manufacturing based on cyber-physical system. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14(5):2271–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahebjamnia N, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Ghorbani N (2016) Designing a fuzzy Q-learning multi-agent quality control system for a continuous chemical production line - a case study. Pergamon Press, Inc

  26. Jarrahi F, Abdul-Kader W (2015) Performance evaluation of a multi-product production line: an approximation method. Appl Math Model 39(13):3619–3636

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabar M, Montreuil B, Frayret JM (2012) An agent-based algorithm for personnel shift-scheduling and rescheduling in flexible assembly lines. J Intell Manuf 23(6):2623–2634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alsina EF, Chica M, Trawiński K, Regattieri A (2018) On the use of machine learning methods to predict component reliability from data-driven industrial case studies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5–8):2419–2433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadeghian R, Sadeghian MR (2016) A decision support system based on artificial neural network and fuzzy analytic network process for selection of machine tools in a flexible manufacturing system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9–12):1795–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Diez-Olivan A, Pagan JA, Khoa NLD, Sanz R, Sierra B (2017) Kernel-based support vector machines for automated health status assessment in monitoring sensor data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1–4):327–340

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu J, Tang Z, Jin Z, Chen Q, Xu P, Liu W (2016) Visual perception-based statistical modeling of complex grain image for product quality monitoring and supervision on assembly production line. PLoS One 11(3):e0146484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yun JP, Chang HP (2017) Vision-based surface defect inspection for thick steel plates. Opt Eng 56(5):053108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Şaban Ö, Akdemir B (2018) Real-time product quality control system using optimized gabor filter bank. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):11–19

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grabowski D, Cristalli C (2015) Production line quality control using infrared imaging. Infrared Phys 71:416–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sahnoun M, Bettayeb B, Bassetto SJ, Tollenaere M (2016) Simulation-based optimization of sampling plans to reduce inspections while mastering the risk exposure in semiconductor manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 27(6):1335–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanjie X, Dalin R, Shibo W (2017) EDM machining quality control and parameters optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5–8):1307–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu AM, Gao JM, Chen K (2016) Excavation of critical resource node for quality control of multi-variety mixed production shopfloor based on complex network property. Proc Inst Mech Eng J Eng Manuf 230(1):169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Diao G, Zhao L, Yao Y (2015) A dynamic quality control approach by improving dominant factors based on improved principal component analysis. Int J Prod Res 53(14):4287–4303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ebrahimipour V, Najjarbashi A, Sheikhalishahi M (2015) Multi-objective modeling for preventive maintenance scheduling in a multiple production line. J Intell Manuf 26(1):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang J, Zhang L, Duan L, Gao RX (2017) A new paradigm of cloud-based predictive maintenance for intelligent manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 28(5):1125–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rezaei-Malek M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Siadat A, Dantan JY (2018) A novel model for the integrated planning of part quality inspection and preventive maintenance in a linear-deteriorating serial multi-stage manufacturing system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(9–12):3633–3650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shrivastava D, Kulkarni MS, Vrat P (2016) Integrated design of preventive maintenance and quality control policy parameters with CUSUM chart. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9–12):2101–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li Y, Ge SS (2016) Force tracking control for motion synchronization in human-robot collaboration. Robotica 34(6):1260–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lasota PA, Shah JA (2015) Analyzing the effects of human-aware motion planning on close-proximity human-robot collaboration. Hum Factors 57(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Degeafernández J, Mronga D, Günther M, Knobloch T, Wirkus M, Schröer M et al (2017) Multimodal sensor-based whole-body control for human–robot collaboration in industrial settings. Robot Auton Syst 94:102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Brundage MP, Chang Q, Li Y, Arinez J, Xiao G (2016) Sustainable manufacturing performance indicators for a serial production line. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 13(2):676–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xu W, Shao L, Yao B, Zhou Z, Pham DT (2016) Perception data-driven optimization of manufacturing equipment service scheduling in sustainable manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 41:86–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Wamba SF, Papadopoulos T (2016) The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(1–4):631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. ÄwikÅa G (2013) Methods of manufacturing data acquisition for production management - a review. Adv Mater Res 837:618–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Abrishambaf R, Hashemipour M, Bal M (2013) Structural modeling of industrial wireless sensor and actuator networks for reconfigurable mechatronic systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(5–8):793–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Backhaus J, Reinhart G (2015) Digital description of products, processes and resources for task-oriented programming of assembly systems. J Intell Manuf 28(8):1787–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Levalle RR, Scavarda M, Nof SY (2013) Collaborative production line control: minimisation of throughput variability and WIP. Int J Prod Res 51(23–24):7289–7307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hou ZS, Jian-Xin XU (2009) On data-driven control theory: the state of the art and perspective. Acta Automat Sin 35(6):650–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li J, Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhao L (2015) Big data in product lifecycle management. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1–4):667–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Han Q, Venkatasubramanian N (2007) Timeliness-accuracy balanced collection of dynamic context data. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 18(2):158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cheng Y, Chen K, Sun H, Zhang Y, Tao F (2017) Data and knowledge mining with big data towards smart production. J Ind Inf Integr 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.08.001

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tao F, Bi L, Zuo Y, Nee AYC (2017) A cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm for large-scale process planning with energy consideration. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(6):061016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Tao F, Bi L, Zuo Y, Nee AYC (2017) Partial/parallel disassembly sequence planning for complex products. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(1):011016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Huang JJ (2016) Resource decision making for vertical and horizontal integration problems in an enterprise. J Oper Res Soc 67(11):1363–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tao F, Zhang L, Liu Y, Cheng Y, Wang L, Xu X (2015) Manufacturing service management in cloud manufacturing: overview and future research directions. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(4):040912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Quintas J, Menezes P, Dias J (2016) Information model and architecture specification for context awareness interaction decision support in cyber-physical human–machine systems. IEEE Trans Human–Mach Syst 47(3):323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhong RY, Huang GQ, Lan SL, Dai QY, Xu C, Zhang T (2015) A big data approach for logistics trajectory discovery from RFID-enabled production data. Int J Prod Econ 165:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Matsas E, Vosniakos GC, Batras D, Matsas E, Vosniakos GC, Batras D (2018) Prototyping proactive and adaptive techniques for human-robot collaboration in manufacturing using virtual reality. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 50:168–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Grauer M, Karadgi S, Müller U, Metz D, Schäfer W (2010) Proactive control of manufacturing processes using historical data. International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 399–408

  66. Moghaddam M, Nof SY (2017) The collaborative factory of the future. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30:23–43

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dai X, Gao Z (2013) From model, signal to knowledge: a data-driven perspective of fault detection and diagnosis. IEEE T Ind Inform 9(4):2226–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Adamson G, Wang L, Moore P (2016) Feature-based control and information framework for adaptive and distributed manufacturing in cyber physical systems. J Manuf Syst 43(2):305–315

    Google Scholar 

  69. Khashei M, Bijari M (2011) A novel hybridization of artificial neural networks and ARIMA models for time series forecasting. J Appl Soft Comput 11:2664–2675

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is financially supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2016YFB1101700), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 51705014 and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 51875030. This paper is an expanded version of a paper entitled smart production line: common factors and data-driven implementation method presented at The 12th ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC2017), June 4-8, 2017, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, People’s Republic of China

    Yongping Zhang, Ying Cheng & Fei Tao

  2. School of Industrial Engineering and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Xi Vincent Wang

  3. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    Ray Y. Zhong

  4. Key Laboratory of Contemporary Design and Integrated Manufacturing Technology, Ministry of Education, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, People’s Republic of China

    Yingfeng Zhang

Authors
  1. Yongping Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xi Vincent Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ray Y. Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yingfeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fei Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongping Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y., Wang, X.V. et al. Data-driven smart production line and its common factors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103, 1211–1223 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03469-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03469-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation