Low-pressure plasma treatment of CFRP substrates for epoxy-adhesive bonding: an investigation of the effect of various process gases

  • M. PizzorniEmail author
  • E. Lertora
  • C. Gambaro
  • C. Mandolfino
  • M. Salerno
  • M. Prato


This work reports a systematic and quantitative evaluation of the effects induced on the adhesive properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) substrates by various vacuum cold-plasma treatments. In particular, surface activation of the CFRP substrates was performed using several combinations of exposure time, plasma power, and processing gas (air, O2, Ar and N2). By comparing these plasma treatments with conventional techniques of abrasion and peel ply, it was possible to substantially increase the performance of the adhesively bonded joints made by overlapping the CFRP substrates with a structural epoxy resin. On each differently treated surface, measurements of roughness and of wettability were performed, allowing the evaluation of the increase in surface energy after the plasma treatment. XPS analyses allowed the identification of the chemical state of the substrates and showed an in-depth functionalization of the outer layer of the CFRP material. The experimental results show that an engineered plasma treatment of the CFRP substrates allows one to modify the surface morphology and both wetting and chemical activation properties of the treated surfaces, resulting in an increased mechanical shear strength of the joints.


Surface treatment Low-pressure plasma Carbon fiber reinforced polymer Epoxy adhesive Bonding mechanism analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. 1.
    Friedrich K, Almajid AA (2013) Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Appl Compos Mater 20:107–128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AL-Zubaidy H, Zhao XL, Al-Mihaidi R (2011) Mechanical behaviour of normal modulus carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) and epoxy under impact tensile loads. Procedia Eng 10:2453–2458. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morioka K, Tomita Y, Takigawa K (2001) High-temperature fracture properties of CFRP composite for aerospace applications. Mater Sci Eng A 319–321:675–678. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar SB, Sridhar I, Sivashanker S, Osiyemi SO, Bag A (2006) Tensile failure of adhesively bonded CFRP composite scarf joints. Mater Sci Eng B 132:113–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanerva M, Saarela O (2013) The peel ply surface treatment for adhesive bonding of composites: a review. Int J Adhes Adhes 43.
  6. 6.
    Holtmannspötter J, Czarnecki JV, Wetzel M, Dolderer D, Eisenschink C (2013) The use of peel ply as a method to create reproduceable but contaminated surfaces for structural adhesive bonding of carbon Fiber reinforced plastics. J Adhes 89:96–110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schweizer M, Meinhard D, Ruck S, Riegel H, Knoblauch V (2017) Adhesive bonding of CFRP: a comparison of different surface pre-treatment strategies and their effect on the bonding shear strength. J Adhes Sci Technol 31:2581–2591. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis M, Bond D (1999) Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs. Int J Adhes Adhes 19:91–105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wegman RF, Van Twisk J (2013) Surface preparation techniques for adhesive bonding, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ebnesajjad S, Landrock AH (2014) Material surface preparation techniques. Adhes Technol Handb, pp 37–46.
  11. 11.
    Tang L, Kardos JL (1997) A review of methods for improving the interfacial adhesion between carbon fiber and polymer matrix. Polym Compos 18:100–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Montes-Morán MA, Martínez-Alonso A, Tascón JMD, Young RJ (2001) Effects of plasma oxidation on the surface and interfacial properties of ultra-high modulus carbon fibres. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 32:361–371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang S, Lu N, Wang JK, Ryu S-K, Choi H-S (2007) Novel effects of surface modification on activated carbon fibers using a low pressure plasma treatment. J Phys Chem C 111:1820–1829. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shanahan MER, Bourges-Monnier C (1996) Effects of plasma treatment on the adhesion of an epoxy composite. Int J Adhes Adhes 16:129–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li R, Ye L, Mai Y (1997) Application of plasma technologies in fibre-reinforced polymer composites: a review of recent developments. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 28:73–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tendero C, Tixier C, Tristant P, Desmaison J, Leprince P (2006) Atmospheric pressure plasmas: a review. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc 61:2–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D’Agostino R, Favia P, Oehr C, Wertheimer MR (2005) Low-temperature plasma processing of materials: past, present, and future. Plasma Process Polym 2:7–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Molitor P, Barron V, Young T (2001) Surface treatment of titanium for adhesive bonding to polymer composites: a review. Int J Adhes Adhes 21:129–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He P, Chen K, Yu B, Yue CY, Yang J (2013) Surface microstructures and epoxy bonded shear strength of Ti6Al4V alloy anodized at various temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 82:15–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marín-Sánchez M, Conde A, García-Rubio M, Lavia A, García I (2016) Durability of titanium adhesive bonds with surface pretreatments based on alkaline anodisation. Int J Adhes Adhes 70:225–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu S (1973) Polar and nonpolar interactions in adhesion. J Adhes 5:39–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu S (1971) Calculation of interfacial tension in polymer systems. J Polym Sci Part C Polym Symp 34:19–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sakai H, Fujii T (1999) The dependence of the apparent contact angles on gravity. J Colloid Interface Sci 210:152–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Extrand CW, In Moon S (2010) When sessile drops are no longer small: transitions from spherical to fully flattened. Langmuir 26:11815–11822. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vesel A, Mozetic M (2017) New developments in surface functionalization of polymers using controlled plasma treatments. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:293001. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD (1992) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.
  27. 27.
    Lee H, Ohsawa I, Takahashi J (2015) Effect of plasma surface treatment of recycled carbon fiber on carbon fiber-reinforced plastics (CFRP) interfacial properties. Appl Surf Sci 328:241–246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li S, Sun T, Liu C, Yang W, Tang Q (2018) A study of laser surface treatment in bonded repair of composite aircraft structures. R Soc Open Sci 5.
  29. 29.
    Mittal K (2015) Advances in contact angle, wettability and adhesion, vol 2.
  30. 30.
    Baldan A (2012) Adhesion phenomena in bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 38:95–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maeva E, Severina I, Bondarenko S, Chapman G, O’neill B, Severin F et al (2004) Acoustical methods for the investigation of adhesively bonded structures: a review. Can J Phys 82:981–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pizzorni M, Gambaro C, Lertora E, Mandolfino C (2018) Effect of process gases in vacuum plasma treatment on adhesion properties of titanium alloy substrates. Int J Adhes Adhes 86:113–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic SchoolUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Materials Characterization FacilityIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations