Skip to main content
Log in

Friction capabilities of graphite-based lubricants at room and over 1400 K temperatures

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work investigates the lubricant capabilities at room and hot-forging temperatures (>1400 K) of three types of lubricants with two different graphite concentrations (8% and 12%). These lubricants are distinguished by measuring the percentage of chemical elements and average size of graphite particles. Later, two standardized methods, i.e., pin-on disc and ring test, are utilized to assess the main friction differences under laboratory and real industry conditions, respectively. The results exhibit that the friction values at room temperature are lower for lubricant B, no matter which type of graphite concentration is used, whereas at hot-forging temperatures, greater percentage of graphite enhances lower frictional values when higher deformations are assessed. Additionally, the ring tests performed at hot-forging temperatures show significant tribology differences when the degree of deformation reaches 50%. Particularly, the lubricant B shows the lowest values of friction coefficients of 0.22 and 0.21 for 8% and 12% of graphite concentration, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the selection of a proper type of lubricant (regarding chemical composition and size of solid suspension) and the graphite concentration are sensitive parameters, when it comes to achieve different bulk deformations combined with extreme temperatures like in hot-forging process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altan T, Ngaile G, Shen G (2004) Cold and hot forging: fundamentals and applications. ASM International, ISBN: 978-0-87170-805-2

  2. Sofuoglu H, Gedikli H, Rasty J (2000) Determination of friction coefficient by employing the ring compression test. J Eng Mater Technol 123(3):338–348. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1369601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camacho AM, Torralvo AI, Bernal C, Sevilla L (2013) Investigations on friction factors in metal forming of industrial alloys. Procedia Eng 63:564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. González HA, Sánchez Egea AJ, Travieso-Rodríguez JA, Llumà i Fuentes J, Jorba Peiró J (2018) Estimation of the polishing time for different metallic alloys in surface texture removal. Mach Sci Technol 22:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2017.1402931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Valero J, Marín MM, Camacho AM (2015) Influence of load application methodology in the performance of ring compression tests. Procedia Eng 132:306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Camacho AM, Veganzones M, Claver J, Martín F, Sevilla L, Ángel Sebastián M (2016) Determination of actual friction factors in metal forming under heavy loaded regimes combining experimental and numerical analysis. Materials 9(9), 751):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim H, Altan T (2010) Tribology in forming advanced high strength steels: evaluation of lubricants, tool materials and coatings for reducing galling. LAP Lambert academic publishing, Saarbrücken ISBN: 978-3-8383-0590-5

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oliveira RA, Alguero Koller L, Schaeffer L (2003) Evaluation of two commercially-available lubricants by means of ring test to AA 6061 F aluminum alloys. Mater Res 6(4):591–597. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392003000400028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirahmadi SJ, Hamedi M, Cheraghzadeh M (2015) Investigating friction factor in forging of Ti-6Al-4V through isothermal ring compression test. Tribol Trans 0:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2015.1019598

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ohdar RK, Talukdar P, Israr Equbal M (2015) Evaluation of friction coefficient of 38MnVS6 medium carbon micro-alloyed steel in hot forging process by using ring compression test. Technology Letters 2(3):12–16 ISSN: 2348–8131

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shahriari D, Amiri A, Sadeghi MH (2010) Study on hot ring compression test of Nimonic 115 superalloy using experimental observations and 3D FEM simulation. JMEPEG 19:633–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-009-9522-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu C, Ou H, Zhao Z (2015) An alternative evaluation method for friction condition in cold forging by ring with boss compression test. J Mater Process Technol 224:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu C, Yin Q, Zhao Z, Ou H (2017) A new measuring method for friction factor by using ring with inner boss compression test. Int J Mech Sci 123:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sánchez Egea AJ, Deferrari N, Abate G, Martínez Krahmer D, López de Lacalle LN (2018) Short-cut method to assess a gross available energy in a medium-load screw friction press. Metals 8(3), 173):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8030173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cristino VAM, Rosa PAR, Martins PAF (2015) The role of interfaces in the evaluation of friction by ring compression testing. Exp Tech 39:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2012.00857.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cristino VAM, Rosa PAR, Martins PAF (2011) Surface roughness and material strength of tribo-pairs in ring compression tests. Tribol Int 44:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto R, Harada S, Utsunomiya H (2015) Influence of oxide scale formed on chrome steel surface in steam atmosphere on deformation behavior of chrome steel in hot ring compression. ISIJ Int 55(8):1711–1720. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2014-754

  18. Zhu Y, Zeng W, Ma X, Tai Q, Li Z, Li X (2011) Determination of the friction factor of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy in hot forging by means of ring-compression test using FEM. Tribol Int 44:2074–2080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2011.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dohda K, Boher C, Rezai-Aria F, Mahayotsanun N (2015) Tribology in metal forming at elevated temperatures. Friction 3(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-015-0077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li LX, Peng DS, Liu JA, Liu ZQ (2001) An experiment study of the lubrication behavior of graphite in hot compression tests of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Mater Process Tech 112(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00845-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Asai K, Kitamura K (2014) Estimation of frictional property of lubricants for hot forging of steel using low-speed ring compression test. Procedia Engineering 81:1970–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Asai K, Kitamura K, Yukawa N, Hayashi N (2017) Estimation of friction by using improved calibration curves of ring compression test for hot forging of steel. Procedia Engineering 207:2280–2285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sánchez Egea AJ, Martynenko V, Martínez Krahmer D, López de Lacalle LN, Benítez A, Genovese G (2018) On the cutting performance of segmented diamond blades when dry-cutting concrete. Materials 11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gunda RK, Narala SKR (2016) Tribological studies to analyze the effect of solid lubricant particle size on friction and wear behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Surf Coat Technol 308:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.06.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Devendra Singh GD, Sivakumar Konathala LN, Prasad VVDN (2016) Friction reduction capabilities of silicate compounds used in an engine lubricant on worn surfaces. Adv Tribol 1901493:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1901493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang L, Shivpuri R (2007) An isothermal finite difference model for droplet spread in the spraying of hot die surfaces with water-based graphite lubricants. J Manuf Sci Eng 129(5):874–884. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2752525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Male AT, Cocroft MG (1964) A method for the determination of the coefficient of friction of metals under condition of bulk plastic deformation. J Inst Metals 93:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bartz WJ (1972) Some investigations on the influence of particle size on the lubricating effectiveness of molybdenum disulfide. ASLE Trans 15(3):207–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/05698197208981418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

CRAFMSA S.A. is acknowledged for their support and contribution to this work. We give thanks to Soledad Pereda from INTI-Mecánica for the valuable support with the electronic microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy analysis.

Funding

This work is supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (reference project: FJCI-2016-29297), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Chile (Fondecyt project 3180006), and the Aeronautics Advanced Manufacturing Center (CFAA) of Bilbao.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Sánchez Egea.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez Egea, A.J., Martynenko, V., Abate, G. et al. Friction capabilities of graphite-based lubricants at room and over 1400 K temperatures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102, 1623–1633 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03290-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03290-4

Keywords

Navigation