Modal identification of a machine tool structure during machining operations
- 128 Downloads
The identification of modal parameters of a machine tool structure, in service, is important to ensure stability and productivity during machining operations. The characterization can be carried out through an Operational Modal Analysis (OMA). However, in the presence of strong harmonic excitation, the application of OMA is not straightforward. To overcome this difficulty, the Transmissibility Function-Based (TFB) method is proposed. The major advantage of this approach is its independence from the excitation nature and its ability to separate structural poles from spurious ones. The main novelty of this paper lies in the investigation of the TFB approach to identify the modal properties of a machine tool, during machining operations. Identified modal model through an Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) of the considered machine tool, at rest, presents our reference modal base to validate results obtained through the TFB approach. For a comparison purpose, the modified Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) method is also investigated. Both methods enable the identification of the modal properties under operational conditions, with a clear advantage to the TFB approach due to its ability to eliminate all of the preponderant harmonic components from the measured data without the need of any additional selection criteria. The TFB method is thus a reliable technique for the identification of modal parameters of a machine tool in operational conditions.
KeywordsOperational modal analysis Machine tool Identification procedure Transmissibility
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was sponsored by the French government research program through the IMobS3 Excellence Laboratory, by the European Union through the Regional competitiveness program and by the Auvergne region.
- 2.Maamar A, Bouzgarrou B-C, Gagnol V, Fathallah R (2017) Time domain stability analysis for machining processes. Advances in Acoustics and Vibration: 77–88Google Scholar
- 3.Chen G, Li Y, Liu X (2018) Pose-dependent tool tip dynamics prediction using transfer learning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 137(2018):30–41Google Scholar
- 8.Altintas Y, Automation Manufacturing (2000) Metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 10.Masjedian M-H, Keshmiri M (2009) A review on operational modal analysis researches: classification of methods and applications. In: Proceeding of the 3rd international operational modal analysis conference, pp 707–718Google Scholar
- 11.Kushnir E (2004) Application of operational modal analysis to a machine tool testing. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition: 57–62Google Scholar
- 15.Bienert J, Andersen P, Aguirre R (2015) A harmonic peak reduction technique for operational modal analysis of rotating machinery. In: 6th international operational modal analysis conferenceGoogle Scholar
- 16.Rode S-V, Ladhake S-A (2010) An adaptive filter for harmonic elimination. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 10:154–157Google Scholar
- 21.Peeters B, Van der Auweraer H, et al. (2005) PolyMAX: a revolution in operational modal analysis. In: 1st international operational modal analysis conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 26–27Google Scholar
- 22.Brinker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2000) Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In: Proceedings of 18th international modal analysis conferenceGoogle Scholar
- 25.Brincker R, Andersen P, Moller N (2000) An indicator for separation of structural and harmonic modes in output-only modal testing. In: Proceeding of the 18th international modal analysis conferenceGoogle Scholar
- 26.Jacobsen N-J, Andersen P, Brincker R (2007) Eliminating the influence of harmonic components in operational modal analysis. In: Proceedings of the 25th international modal analysis conferenceGoogle Scholar
- 27.Jacobsen N-J, Andersen P, Brincker R (2007) Using EFDD as a robust technique for deterministic excitation in operational modal analysis. International Operational Modal Analysis Conference: 193–200Google Scholar